1 / 21

Experimental Studies

Experimental Studies. Types of Experimental Studies. Multiple experimental groups Blinds single, double, triple. Public Health & Clinical Objectives. Modify natural history of disease and express disease prognosis Prevent or delay death or disability

bernad
Download Presentation

Experimental Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experimental Studies

  2. Types of Experimental Studies • Multiple experimental groups • Blinds • single, double, triple

  3. Public Health & Clinical Objectives • Modify natural history of disease and express disease prognosis • Prevent or delay death or disability • Improve health of patient or population • Need to use best preventive or therapeutic measures • Randomized trials are ideal design to evaluate effectiveness and side effects of new forms of intervention

  4. Historical Perspectives • Sir Francis Galton (1883) - ruminated over the influence of prayer • Joyce and Welldon (1965) found no benefit of prayer • R. C. Byrd (1988) - suggested positive benefits • Washington Post Parade article (2003) - also suggested positive benefits

  5. Recent Perspectives • Effect of: • coffee on CHD • carotene on cancers • hormonal therapy on breast cancer • drug-lowering cholesterol on CHD

  6. Randomized Trials • Historically, were done accidentally, in other words, “unplanned trials” • Ambroise Pare (1510 - 1590) discovered new treatment for war wounds when original therapy was unavailable • James Lind (1747) studying scurvy • Subjects assigned to groups using a non-biased procedure

  7. Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial

  8. Selection of Subjects • Well-designed • Eliminate subjectivity • Promote reliability • Replicable, as with laboratory experiments • Accurate

  9. Selection of Subjects:Studies without Comparison • Question: If we administer a drug and the patient improves, can we attribute the improvement to the administration of that drug? • Answer:Results can always be improved by omitting controls. - Prof. Hugo Muensch Harvard University

  10. Selection of Subjects:Studies with Comparison • Historical controls (comparison group from past) • Data must be abstracted from records not kept for research purposes • Differences may be due to quality of the data • May not be able to substantiate differences • Can be useful for drugs developed against fatal diseases

  11. Selection of Subjects: Studies with Comparison(cont.) • Simultaneous Non-Randomized Controls • May introduce bias • Example - BCG vaccination study in NYC in 1975 • Investigators introduced selection bias in the experimental group and controls • A change in the study design that eliminated selection bias, although still not randomized, also eliminated differences observed in final results

  12. Selection of Subjects (cont.):Randomization • Best approach • Uses tables of random numbers • Must still eliminate physician bias • Can achieve non-predictability

  13. Effect of Comparability Not Randomized Randomized

  14. Selection of Subjects (cont.):Stratified Randomization • Useful when concerned that certain variables may affect the outcome • For example, when the prognosis may be much worse for older patients • Want two treatment groups to be comparable in terms of the variables of concern • Initially stratify (layer) the study population according to each variable of concern and then randomize participants to treatment groups within each stratum

  15. Selection of Subjects (cont.):Stratified Randomization

  16. Data Collection on Subjects:Potential Variables • Treatment: • that was assigned • that was received • Outcome • Explicit criteria required • Comparable measurements required • Prognostic Profile at Entry • If risk factors for a bad outcome are known, assure that treatment groups are reasonably similar for these factors • Data for prognostic factors obtained upon enrollment in study • Masking (Blinding)

  17. Data Collection on Subjects(cont.):Masking (Blinding) • Attempt to eliminate biases & preconceptions • Single-blind • Subject masking • Use of placebo • Double-blind • Subject masking and researcher masking • Data collectors and data analysts • Triple-blind • Subject masking, researcher masking and study sponsor masking

More Related