Slide1 l.jpg
Advertisement
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 21

Taxes and markets. Most of the discussion will focus on: Excise taxes: taxes on specific goods, like gasoline, cigarettes, and alcoholic beverages. PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Taxes and markets. Most of the discussion will focus on: Excise taxes: taxes on specific goods, like gasoline, cigarettes, and alcoholic beverages. When the government levies a tax on a good, who bears the burden of taxation (buyers or sellers)?

Download Presentation

Taxes and markets. Most of the discussion will focus on: Excise taxes: taxes on specific goods, like gasoline, cigarettes, and alcoholic beverages.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Taxes and markets.

Most of the discussion will focus on:

Excise taxes: taxes on specific goods, like gasoline, cigarettes, and alcoholic beverages.

When the government levies a tax on a good, who bears the burden of taxation (buyers or sellers)?

This is a question about tax incidence (the study of who bears the burden of taxation).


Slide2 l.jpg

We will see that:

The one who “pays” the tax (the one who is required to give payment to the government) . . .

. . . is not necessarily the one who “pays” the tax (the one who bears the burden of taxation).

Usually, it’s the seller who is required to give payment to the government. But we will consider the other case as well: buyer gives payment to government.


Slide3 l.jpg

Let’s suppose the government levies a $0.50/unit tax on the market for widgets . . .

. . . and buyers are required to send payment to the government. (For every widget you buy, you have to send a check for $0.50 to the government.)

In supply and demand graphs, let’s interpret “price” (plotted on vertical axis) as the amount, per unit sold, that changes hands between buyer and seller.

How will tax affect supply and demand graph?


Slide4 l.jpg

($/widget)

Demand curve D1 to start.

p1

p1 - 0.50

D1

D2

widgets/day

Q1

When tax goes into effect, demand will shift down by

$0.50/unit.

Consider one particular point on D1

Before tax, when buyers have to

give p1 $/widget, they demand

Q1 widgets/day.

Same will be true after tax

goes into effect.

But (!) -- after tax is in effect, if buyers are to give up p1 $/widget

in total, amount paid to seller must be p1 - 0.50 $/widget.

Original point shifts down by 0.50 $/widget.

Same story for each point on D1 -- demand shifts down by 0.50.


Slide5 l.jpg

Now let’s look at a $0.50/unit tax on widgets . . .

. . . with sellers required to send payment to the government. (For every widget a seller sells, she has to send a check to the government for $0.50.)

Remember, “price” plotted on vertical axis is the amount, per unit, that changes hands between buyer and seller.


Slide6 l.jpg

Supply curve S1 to start.

($/widget)

S2

S1

p1 + 0.50

p1

widgets/day

Q1

When tax goes into effect, supply will shift up by

$0.50/unit.

Consider one particular point on S1

Before tax, when sellers “pocket”

p1 $/widget, they supply

Q1 widgets/day.

Same will be true after tax

goes into effect.

But (!) -- after tax is in effect, if sellers are to “pocket” p1 $/widget,

amount received from buyer must be p1 + 0.50 $/widget.

Original point shifts up by 0.50 $/widget.

Same story for each point on S1 -- supply shifts up by 0.50


Slide7 l.jpg

Recap:

If the buyers are required to send tax payment to government:

Demand shifts down by amount of tax. (Demand decreases.)

If sellers are required to send tax payment to government:

Supply shifts up by amount of tax. (Supply decreases -- even though it’s an upward shift.)

What about the effects on market equilibrium?


Slide8 l.jpg

($/widget)

To start: D1, S1, p1*, Q1*

t $/widget

S1

pb*

p1*

. . . shifting demand

down by t $/widget.

ps*

D1

D2

Q2*

Q1* (widgets/day)

Equilibrium quantity goes down: Q1* to Q2*

New “equilibrium price” is a sellers’ price: ps*

Consider a t $/unit tax on widgets -- and buyers

are required to send payment to government.

Then the tax goes into

effect . . .

Buyers’ price is t $/widget higher: pb* = ps* + t


Slide9 l.jpg

To start: Same D1, S1,

p1*, Q1* as before.

($/widget)

S2

t $/widget

S1

pb*

p1*

. . . shifting supply up

by t $/widget.

ps*

D1

Q2*

Q1* (widgets/day)

Equilibrium quantity goes down: Q1* to Q2*

New “equilibrium price” is a buyers’ price: pb*

Sellers’ price is t $/widget lower: ps* = pb* - t

Consider same t $/widget tax -- but this time, sellers

are required to send payment to government.

Then the tax goes

into effect . . .


Slide10 l.jpg

($/widget)

($/widget)

S2

S1

S1

pb*

pb*

p1*

p1*

ps*

ps*

D1

D1

D2

Q2*

Q1* (widgets/day)

Q2*

Q1* (widgets/day)

What difference does it make if buyers “pay” the tax,

or sellers “pay” the tax?

No difference!

Let’s bring in the graph from the “buyers ‘pay’” analysis.

Now let’s overlay the graph for the “sellers ‘pay’” case.


Slide11 l.jpg

The effects of an excise tax are independent of whether buyers or sellers are required to send the tax payment to the government.

With no tax, “buyers’ price” (the amount buyers pay out, per unit) is the same as “sellers’ price” (the amount sellers “pocket,” per unit).

The fundamental effect of a tax is to introduce a gap, or “tax wedge” between the buyers’ and sellers’ prices.

This observation gives us another way to do the analysis.


Slide12 l.jpg

($/widget)

tax wedge

S1

pb*

p1*

ps*

D1

Q2*

Q1* (widgets/day)

Let’s go back to the original (before-tax-is-introduced)

demand and supply curves again.

The tax introduces

a tax wedge of

t $/widget between

buyers’ and sellers’

prices.

Take a vertical bar of height t $/widget and see where

it “fits” between supply and demand to the left of equil.

This determines pb*, ps*, Q2*.


Slide13 l.jpg

Again, the effects of the tax are independent of who “pays the tax” (sends the check to the government).

But what are the effects? From the graph, we see:

Equilibrium quantity falls (from Q1* to Q2*).

The price buyers pay increases (from p1* to pb*).

The price sellers “pocket” decreases (from p1* to ps*).


Slide14 l.jpg

Notice:

In general, the burden of the tax is “shared” between buyers and sellers . . .

. . . buyers’ price goes up some,

. . . and sellers’ price goes down some.

Often we hear:

“When an excise tax is levied on a good, sellers will ‘pass the tax along’ to buyers.”


Slide15 l.jpg

($/widget)

At a buyers’ price

of p1* + t, quantity

demanded is Q3 . . .

S1

p1* + t

p1*

D1

Q3

Q1* (widgets/day)

Excess supply -- price must fall . . .

What if they tried to “pass the tax along” (mark up the

original price by full amount of tax)?

. . . and sellers’

price would be p1*

so quantity

supplied is Q1*.

. . . to the level of pb* from previous graphs.


Slide16 l.jpg

We’ve seen that the effects of a tax are independent of who “pays” the tax ( . . . independent of who is required to give payment to government).

But this basic lesson isn’t understood by everyone!

FICA (Federal Insurance Contribution Act) payroll taxes.

-- pays for Social Security and Medicare.

-- takes about 15.3% of (before-tax) earnings fortypical worker (in 2008).

-- Congress mandated a 50-50 division.

(More on FICA: http://www.ssa.gov/ . . .)

But the “mandated division” is irrelevant!


Slide17 l.jpg

But then, what does determine how the burden of a tax is distributed? (Now coming back to the tax incidence question.)

In the graphs we’ve drawn, it looks like an approximately 50-50 split:

-- buyers’ price goes up by about half of the tax.

-- sellers’ price goes down by the other half.

Does it always work out this way?


Slide18 l.jpg

Tax incidence and elasticity

($/widget)

tax wedge

pb*

Supply

p1*

ps*

Demand

(widgets/day)

Suppose that supply is more elastic than demand:

For a given

“tax wedge” . . .

. . . buyers’ price

rises more than

sellers’ price

falls.

Tax incidence falls more heavily on buyers (the ones

with the less elastic price-quantity relation).


Slide19 l.jpg

Now suppose that demand is more elastic than supply.

With the same initial equilibrium price as before . . .

($/widget)

Supply

tax wedge

pb*

p1*

Demand

ps*

(widgets/day)

. . . and the same

“tax wedge” as

before . . .

. . . sellers’ price

falls more than

buyers’ price

rises.

Tax incidence falls more heavily on sellers (the ones

with the less elastic price-quantity relation).


Slide20 l.jpg

Cigarettes are subject to significant (state and federal) excise taxes.

The demand for cigarettes is relatively inelastic.

(One study by Craig Gallet and John List in Health Economics, 2003, reports that own price elasticity estimates average -0.40.)

(http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/ . . . )

Elasticity of supply? -- most likely higher than 0.40.

So the incidence of cigarette excise taxes falls more heavily on buyers than sellers.


Slide21 l.jpg

Cigarette excise tax rates.

Federal: $0.39/pack

Iowa: $1.36/pack.

The five highest: NY ($2.75/pack), NJ (2.58),MA (2.51), RI (2.46), WA (2.02)

The six lowest: SC ($0.07/pack), MO (0.17),MS (0.18), KY-VA (0.30)

(http://tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0097.pdf)


  • Login