Quantitative Imaging: Protocol Development and Quality Assurance Issues for Medical Imaging in Clinical Trials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Slide1 l.jpg
Download
1 / 18

Quantitative Imaging: Protocol Development and Quality Assurance Issues for Medical Imaging in Clinical Trials H. Cecil Charles, Ph.D. Director Duke Image Analysis Laboratory Duke University Medical Center Overview Quantitative Imaging vs: Clinical Imaging Protocol Development Issues

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Quantitative Imaging: Protocol Development and Quality Assurance Issues for Medical Imaging in Clinical Trials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Quantitative Imaging: Protocol Development and Quality Assurance Issues for Medical Imaging in Clinical Trials

H. Cecil Charles, Ph.D.

Director

Duke Image Analysis Laboratory

Duke University Medical Center


Overview l.jpg

Overview

  • Quantitative Imaging vs: Clinical Imaging

  • Protocol Development Issues

  • Centrally Monitored QC/QA in multi-center trials

  • Central Data Analysis/Archival Issues


What is quantitative imaging qi and how is it different from clinical imaging ci l.jpg

What Is Quantitative Imaging (QI) and How Is It Different From Clinical Imaging (CI)?


Ci qi l.jpg

Visualization of lesions and/or disease

Radiologic interpretation

Rule-out or rule-in a diagnosis

Diagnostic tree/1°,2°,3° diagnosis

Determination of tissue characteristics from imaging parameters

Algorithm/SOP/scaled interpretation

Numeric output

Incorporation in hypothesis testing or goal driven evaluation

CI QI

Effect Monitoring

Diagnosis


Is there a use for ci in trials l.jpg

Is there a use for CI in trials

  • If imaging is part of the diagnostic inclusion or exclusion criteria, a screening scan may be required

  • The screening scan may or may not be according to the QI protocol

  • Subsequent imaging sessions (including a baseline scan) are based on the QI protocol


Examples of qi l.jpg

Organ volumes or Subvolumes

Perfusion/Permeability/blood flow

Atrophy indices

Necrosis/Hypoxia Indices

Metabolic Indices (e.g. pH, energetics)

Ligand Binding

Vascular Indices

Examples of QI


Issues for qi l.jpg

ISSUES for QI

  • Study Protocol Design

  • Data Quality

  • Data Format Issues

  • Data “Cleaning”

  • Data Registration (serial studies)

  • Data Analysis

  • Data Archival


Study protocol general l.jpg

Study Protocol: General

  • Driven by Study goals and QI Algorithm(s) (Analyses)

  • Maximize Information Content per unit time

  • Deterministic Figure of Merit (FOM)

    • CNR/(unit resolution * unit time)

  • Patient Comfort/Compliance


Multiple sites platforms l.jpg

Multiple Sites/Platforms

  • Imaging protocol cross-validation

  • Rationalize Nomenclature

  • “Uniform” site training tailored to manufacturer/HW/SW status

  • Retrain with upgrades if necessary

  • Centrally monitored protocol compliance (QC)


Data quality assessment l.jpg

Data Quality Assessment

  • SNR/CNR

  • Artifacts (e.g. Motion) [quantitative criteria: clutter/noise]

  • Protocol Adherence

    • Scan Parameters

    • Schedule

    • Technical Parameters (e.g. contrast dose and rate)

  • System Performance

    • Spatial Fidelity! (esp. in serial studies)


Incoming data formats l.jpg

Incoming Data Formats

  • Native data from multiple manufacturers and multiple S/W releases

  • Varying Media Formats

    • MOD’s, DAT(s), CDROM(s)

  • Varying File Formats

    • DICOM(s)

    • Proprietary Formats

    • ACR/NEMA

    • “Local” formats (non-commercial PACS)


Data storage formats l.jpg

Data Storage Formats

  • Imaging Industry “standards”

    • DICOM (a flexible standard)

  • Alternate Standards

    • (e.g. Analyze, TIFF)


Data cleaning l.jpg

Data Cleaning

  • Prospective QC

    • Rescan if possible

    • Minimization of Lost Data

  • Data Rejection

    • Quantitative Basis!

  • Site Notification


Data registration l.jpg

Data Registration

  • Minimize positioning errors in protocol

  • Use Immobilizers to alleviate motion

  • REGISTER serial scans


Data registration15 l.jpg

Data Registration

  • Even with on site training and quality technologists, some misalignment will occur in serial studies

  • Alignment of the datasets minimizes the impact of this problem


Data analysis l.jpg

Data Analysis

  • Prospective Criteria based on needs of study

  • Optimize FOM and QC criteria to match needs of algorithm

  • SOP

  • Replicate analysis to address drift


Data archival l.jpg

Data Archival

  • Driven by needs of sponsor and regulatory agencies

  • Central Consolidation and Storage

  • Coordinating Center Archival


Summary l.jpg

Summary

  • Close Intellectual and technological relationship among the sponsor, imaging site(s) and imaging coordinating center

  • Ongoing QC/QA

  • Blinded quantitative data analysis

  • Regulatory compliance


  • Login