1 / 40

Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism. Scott M Silvers, MD 1 st Pan American Conference Emergency Medicine Clinical Policies November 6 – 7, 2003. Lecture Outline. Case Critical Question Literature Search Critical Literature Evaluation Evidence-based Recommendations.

benjamin
Download Presentation

Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Scott M Silvers, MD 1st Pan American Conference Emergency Medicine Clinical Policies November 6 – 7, 2003

  2. Lecture Outline • Case • Critical Question • Literature Search • Critical Literature Evaluation • Evidence-based Recommendations

  3. Case Ms. Smith is an active 39 yo F who presents to the ED with 1 day of pleuritic left anterior chest pain and mild shortness of breath. She denies any cough, leg pain, leg swelling, recent surgery, history of malignancy, or history of DVT / PE in the past. PMH: Hypertension Meds: BCP All: NKDA FH: None SH: Denies tobacco, alcohol, and drug abuse T=37.6 HR= 115 SBP= 120/74 RR=20 SO2=93% RA PE: Normal including heart, lungs, and extremities. Chest X-ray: Normal

  4. Case • What next?? • Ventilation / Perfusion scan? • Traditional pulmonary arteriography? • Computed Tomography (CT) scan?

  5. CT PA in Diagnosing PE Baseline Chest CT… Repeat Chest CT Swensen SJ, et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2002;77:130-138.

  6. Critical Question • What is the diagnostic utility of computed tomography in pulmonary embolism (PE)? • Types of CT imaging for PE • Single detector pulmonary angiogaphy (PA) • Multidetector PA • Combined venography or ultrasound • Negative CT outcome data

  7. Literature Search • Medline January 1992 – Present • Keywords • “Computed tomography,” “CT,” “Pulmonary embolism,” and “PE” • 973 papers • Limits • Human subjects, clinical trials, meta-analyses • 34

  8. Literature Search • Reviews and clinical policies • 2000 – present (references crosschecked)

  9. Definitions for Clarity • CT-PA = CT with pulmonary angiography • Arteriography = Traditional pulmonary angiography

  10. What about single-detector CT-PAfor detecting PE?

  11. Single-Detector CT-PA vs. Arteriography for Detecting PE • All patients compared to arteriography • 5 studies to date • Weaknesses • Small sample size • Large variability of findings • Inclusion of only patients referred for arteriography (sample bias)

  12. Single-Detector CT-PA vs. Arteriography for Detecting PE * = Pooled data

  13. Single-Detector CT-PA vs. Arteriography for Detecting PE * = Pooled data

  14. Single-Detector CT-PA vs. Arteriography for Detecting PE • Explanations for Poor Performance • Less resolution than multi-detector CT • Digital monitor technology not available • Image scrolling on one screen

  15. What about multi-detector CT-PAfor detecting PE?

  16. Multi-Detector CT-PAfor Detecting PE • 4 studies to date • Higher resolution (less motion artifact) • Digital monitors with scrolling images • Weaknesses • Studies variable in use of traditional arteriography as “gold standard” • Large variability of findings

  17. Multi-Detector CT-PAfor Detecting PE

  18. Multi-Detector CT-PAfor Detecting PE

  19. What about CT-PA with Delayed Venography for Detecting PE?

  20. CT Venogram Loud PA et al. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 2001;219:498-502.

  21. CT Pulmonary Angiogram with Delayed Venography for Detecting PE Typical Study Methodology • Consecutive patients with concern for PE • PE = Positive CT PA OR Positive CT venogram • Evaluate benefit of added CT venography Conclusions • CT venography diagnoses an additional 13 – 27% more pulmonary embolism than CT PA alone

  22. CT Pulmonary Angiogram with Delayed Venography for Detecting PE + + -

  23. CT Pulmonary Angiogram with Delayed Venography for Detecting PE + + -

  24. Is CT venography comparable to lower extremity ultrasound? Yes.

  25. Sensitivity of CT Delayed Venography for Detecting DVT * = CT Venography detected DVT that bilateral lower extremity ultrasound missed

  26. Outcome Studies?

  27. Outcome Studies of CT-PA alone for Detecting PE • 6 studies to date • All with significant weaknesses • Excluded patients with other positive testing (Selection Bias) • D-dimer • Lower extremity ultrasound • Adequacy of follow-up period (3 mos – 1 yr) • Lose patients in follow-up

  28. Outcome Studies of CT-PA Alone for Detecting PE

  29. Outcome Studies of CT PA with Delayed Venography for Detecting PE None

  30. Outcome Studies of CT PA with Bilateral Lower Extremity Ultrasound for Detecting PE • 2 studies to date

  31. Outcome After a Negative CT PA with Bilateral Lower Extremity Ultrasound Van Strijen et al (2003; “ANTELOPE” Study Group) • Prospective, Single-detector CT • 510 Consecutive in/outpatients clinically suspected to have PE • 246 with negative CT PA & bilateral lower extremity ultrasound • 3 month follow up (100% capture) • 3 patients returned with symptoms concerning for PE • CT PA positive in 1 (0.4% {95% CI 0.0 – 2.2%}) • Weaknesses • Followed for only 3 months • Study Grade = 2 Van Strijen et al. Ann Int Med. 2003;138:307-315.

  32. Outcome After a Negative CT PA with Bilateral Lower Extremity Ultrasound Musset et al (2002) • Prospective, multi-detector CT • 1,041 consecutive in/outpatients suspected of having PE • 527 Low and intermediate risk patients had negative studies • 507 were not anticoagulated (others e.g. ACS) • 3 month follow up (99% capture) • 9 (1.8 %) developed PE • Of 76 “high risk” patients, 5 (5.3%) had PE • Weaknesses • Followed for only 3 months • Study Grade = 2 Musset et al. Lancet. 2002;360:1914 -1920.

  33. Evidenced-based RecommendationsFor CT scanning in PE Level A Recommendations • None specified

  34. Evidenced-based RecommendationsFor CT scanning in PE Level B Recommendations • Low and intermediate risk patients for pulmonary embolism may be presumed not to have pulmonary embolism following a negative CT pulmonary angiogram and bilateral lower extremity ultrasound . • Low and intermediate risk patients for pulmonary embolism with a negative CT pulmonary angiogram and negative CT venography of the abdomen and lower extremities may be presumed not to have pulmonary embolism.

  35. Evidenced-based RecommendationsFor CT scanning in PE Level C Recommendations • CT with pulmonary angiogram alone may be considered as an alternative diagnostic test to ventilation-perfusion imaging and traditional arteriography in the initial evaluation of a patient with possible pulmonary embolism. • Consider further screening after a negative CT pulmonary angiogram alone among patients with possible pulmonary embolism.

  36. Key References • Swensen SJ, et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2002;77:130-138. • Remy-Jardin M, et al. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique--comparison with pulmonary angiography.Radiology. 1992 Nov;185(2):381-7. • Blum AG, et al. Spiral-computed tomography versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute massive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jul 1;74(1):96-8. • Goodman et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1369-1374. • Remy-Jardin M, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology. 1996;200(3):699-706. • Drucker N, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: assessment of helical CT for diagnosis. Radiology. 1998;209:235-241. • Qanadli SD, et al. Pulmonary embolism detection: prospective evaluation of dual-section helical CT versus selective pulmonary arteriography in 157 patients. Radiology. 2000;217:447-455.

  37. Key References • Ost D, et al. The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans. Am J Med. 2001;110:16-21. • Perrier A, et al. Performance of helical computed tomography in unselected outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Int Med. 2001;135:88-97. • Nilsson T, et al. A comparison of spiral computed tomography and latex agglutination d-dimer assay in acute pulmonary embolism using pulmonary arteriography as gold standard. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002;36(6):373-7. • Loud PA, et al. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 2001;219:498-502. • Loud PA, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in suspected thromboembolic disease: diagnostic accuracy for deep venous evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:61-65. • Cham MD, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. Radiology. 2000;216:744-751. • Coche EE, et al. Using dual-detector helical CT angiography to detect deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic value and additional findings. Amer J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1035-1039. • Au V WK, et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pelvic venography in the evaluation of thrombo-embolic disease. Australasian Radiology. 2001;45:141-145.

  38. Key References • Walsh G, and Redmond S. Does addition of CT pelvic venography to CT pulmonary angiography protocols contribute to the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease? Clinical Radiology. 2002;57:462-465. • Garg K, et al. Thromboembolic disease: comparison of combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with bilateral leg sonography in 70 patients. Amer J Roentgenol. 2000;175:997-1001. • Goodman LR, et al. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram – prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology. 2000;215:535-542. • Gottsäter A, et al. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol. 2001;11:65-72. • Tillie-Lebond I, et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology. 2002;223:461-467. Musset et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet. 2002;360:1914 -1920. • Van Strijen et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: A multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Int Med. 2003;138:307-315

  39. The End

More Related