1 / 42

Strangeness Measurements in BRAHMS

Strangeness Measurements in BRAHMS. Results from Au+Au at s NN =200 GeV p ,K,p at selected rapidities Ratios, yields, slopes for Central Collisions As a function of centrality at y=0 Plan and summary. J.H. Lee Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory

Download Presentation

Strangeness Measurements in BRAHMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strangeness Measurements in BRAHMS • Results from Au+Au at sNN =200 GeV • p,K,p at selected rapidities • Ratios, yields, slopes for Central Collisions • As a function of centrality at y=0 • Plan and summary J.H. Lee Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory For the BRAHMS Collaboration SQM2003 Mar. 13 2003

  2. BRAHMSmeasures over a broad rapidity range SNN=200GeV And More… J.H. Lee (BNL)

  3. Summary of BRAHMS data from RHIC2001 (Run2) running Data • Au+Au and p+p at full energy: sNN =200 GeV • All detectors were installed and working at all centralities • Higher level triggers (Vertex/Centrality/Spectrometer) implemented • ~25M physics events taken • Initial scan of “soft” physics • Selected high-pt and HBT runs Measurements • Charged particle multiplicity (dN/dh): published in PRL • Particle ratios: Will be publishedin PRL • Identified hadron spectra and yields at selected rapidities - Net-proton - dN/dy, slope vs y for p,K,p • High-pT hadrons/p (up to pT ~ 6 GeV/c at y ~ 0, pT~4 at y~2) • Limited HBT

  4. The BRAHMS experimentSetup used for Au+Au data in 2001 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  5. BRAHMS Acceptance A wide range of y and pt is covered by rotating two spectrometers with various magnetic fields. 10 degree 90o 25 GeV/c MRS FS 4o 2.3 degree J.H. Lee (BNL)

  6. Anti-particle/particle ratios vs rapidity at SNN=200 GeV • At y=0 (20% central) pbar/p = 0.75 ±0.04 K-/K+ = 0.95 ±0.05 p-/p+ = 1.01 ±0.04 • Highest pbar/p ratio but still incomplete transparency (~17% increase from 130 GeV) • Ratios ~identical over +-1 unit around mid-rapidity. • Weak centrality and pT dependence • No Hyperon feed down correction applied:less then 5% correction assuming • Lambda/p ~ 0.5 and pbar/p ~ Lambda-Bar/Lambda To be published in PRL : nucl-ex/0207006 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  7. Ratios: Data and AMPT 0-20% at SNN=200 GeV K-/K+ AMPT 20% Central (all pt) Pbar/p • K-/K+ Ratio decreases with y : Inconsistent with models: AMPT, HIJING (AMPT describe other rapidity dependent measurements best so far) • Where is the rest of strangeness at forward? Lambda? J.H. Lee (BNL)

  8. “Universal” Correlation in K-/K+ vs pbar/p? • By simple quark counting in quark recombination K-/K+ = exp(2ms/T)exp(-2mq/T) = exp(2ms/T)(pbar/p)1/3 = (pbar/p)1/3 by assuming local (y) strangeness conservation • K-/K+=(pbar/p)a a = 0.24±0.02 for BRAHMS a = 0.20±0.01 for SPS • Good agreement with the statistical-thermal model prediction by Beccatini et al. (PRC64 2001): Based on SPS results and assuming T=170 MeV From y=0 to 3 At y=0 J.H. Lee (BNL) To be published in PRL

  9. p,K,p Spectra at 0-10% Central at y=0 and y = 3 • Spectra gets softer at higher rapidity • pbar yield drops rapidly with rapidity • protons and pions converge/cross: - y~0: pT 2 GeV/c - y~3: pT 1.2 GeV/c • Protons over K+ - y~0: at high pT (>1GeV/c) - y~3: at all pT J.H. Lee (BNL)

  10. dN/dy at sNN =200 GeV 0-10% central • y width: p,K+ > K- • K broader than SPS • p,K spectra can be fitted by a single Gaussian • Integrated yields are consistent with dNcharged/d distributions J.H. Lee (BNL)

  11. Strangeness : ratio K/ K/p ratio increases as pT increases at y=0 and y=3 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  12. Inverse mTSlope vs. Mass for 0-10% central • All fits are in mT: over same range for all particles, at all rapidities • Show only positive but Negative  Positive • Inverse slope decreases as y increases • Inverse slope increase with mass: transverse flow at all covered rapidities BRAHMS Preliminary y~0, 0.9 y~3 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  13. Strangeness : K/ systematics • K/p ratio flattens at RHIC energy at y~0 • K/p at y~3: similar to SPS (Pb+Pb Central at 17 GeV) - Inverse mT slope also similar - K: T~230 p: T~200 Y=3 Y=0 BRAHMS Preliminary J.H. Lee (BNL)

  14. dN/dy of Net-proton and Models for 0-10% central • “Plateau” at |y| < 1 the yields by 18, 20% at y=0,2.9 • Net-baryon at y =0: ~16 (if N(proton)/N(neutron)  1 ) • More data to be analyzed (at y~2,3.3) • Hyperon feed down will reduce • A range of models is still allowed with these data. J.H. Lee (BNL)

  15. Estimate of amount of stopping • Estimatingy =  (ybeam-y) dN/dy /  dN/dy , as has been done for lower energy data. • Baryon conservation tells us net(p) ~ 68 for Npart~340 (0-10%) or ~85 in the case of full proton/neutron equilibration, N(p) = N(n). • The net(p) measured is ~36. Distributing the remaining 32(53) protons in rapidity interval 3-5.4 with a variety of assumptions leads to an estimated range of • dy of 1.8-2.4. I.e. 2.1 ±0.3. Either extremes would require unusual rapidity distributions. • Even though we do not have measurements in 3-5.4,we may extend another .4 units in future how can we estimate rapidity loss. • We plan to refine this value once all data have been analyzed. J.H. Lee (BNL)

  16. Charged Hadron Spectra as a function of rapidity at y=0 • Mean pt: -increase at low pt -decrease at high pt as <Npart> increase • Collective flow at low pt + Suppression at high pt BRAHMS Preliminary BRAHMS Preliminary J.H. Lee (BNL)

  17. High-pT Physics:Central/Semi-peripheral collisions at y = 0 Yield/<Ncoll>0-10%/Yield/<Ncoll>40-60% • Charged hadron spectra scaled by the number of binary collisions. • high pT suppression in central collisions (0-10%) compared to semi-peripheral (40-60%) • Identified particles at y=0,2:analysis in progress . BRAHMS Preliminary J.H. Lee (BNL)

  18. Spectra vs Centrality at y=0 sNN =200 GeV BRAHMS Preliminary J.H. Lee (BNL)

  19. K/p ratios at y = 0 sNN =200 GeV • K/p ratios increase with pT and centrality BRAHMS Preliminary BRAHMS Preliminary J.H. Lee (BNL)

  20. dN/dy per participant at y=0sNN =200 GeV • For all the particle species, the yield per participant increase with Npart. • K±, p, pbar yields per participant rise faster than p± yield. • Errors statistical only on plot. • Systematic error ~10-20% • Dominant syst. error from Npart determination, and extrapolation of yields. BRAHMS Preliminary J.H. Lee (BNL)

  21. <pt> vs Npart at y=0 • <pT>-pTmin • 0.4-2.4 for pion • 0.6-2.2 for kaon • 0.5-3.4 for p/pbar • <pt> increase with <Npart> and mass: p and pbar increase fast with <Npart>: consistent with radial expansion picture BRAHMS Preliminary p K p J.H. Lee (BNL)

  22. Extended PID for High pt measurements at y=0 – 1 • New Cherenkov detector C4 + TOFW2 at Mid-Rapidity Spectrometer • Currently taking data (d+Au) • p/K identification up to p = 8 GeV/c (Forward Spectrometer PID up to p = 25 GeV/c) • “high-pt” pion measurement up to 5 GeV at y ~ 0 (luminosity limited) J.H. Lee (BNL)

  23. What to expect in the near future Analysis in Progress • Centrality dependent yield/specta at y ~ 0,1,2,3 • Net-proton y ~ 2, 3.3: Better understanding of rapidity loss • Blast-Wave Fit in all rapidities • Identified High-pT (< 4GeV/c) spectra at y=0 and y=2 Run3 (d+Au,p+p), Run4 (Au+Au) • d+Au run in progrsss • Identified high-pt physics: up to pT = 8 GeV at y=0 • Identified yields as a function of reaction plane for y=0-3 with re-configured Si-detector (in discussion) • HBT as a function of rapidity and reaction plane at y=1,3 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  24. Summary: Strangeness Measurements in BRAHMS at sNN =200 GeV At y = 0 – 3: • K-/K+: approximately constant over ±1 unit of rapidity and fall off with y • ”Universal” correlation: K-/K+~(pbar/p)1/4 • K±/p±increase with pT for all rapidities • Kaon production at y=3 at sNN =200 GeV similar as y=0 at SPS • Kaon inverse slope decreases with rapidity • Low to high chemical potential from y=0 to t=3 At y=0: • For K±, the yield per participant increase with Npart. • K±yields per participant rise faster than p± yield. J.H. Lee (BNL)

  25. BRAHMS Publications • “Rapidity dependence of anti-proton to proton ratios in Au+Au collisions at snn =130 GeV” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 112305 • “Charged particle densities from Au+Au Collisions at snn =130 GeV” Phys. Lett. B 523 (2001) 227 • “Pseudorapidity distributions of charged particles from Au+Au collisions at the maximum RHIC energy” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 202301 • “Rapidity dependence of anti-particle-to-particle ratios in Au+Au collisions at snn =200 GeV” Will be published in Phys. Rev. Lett. : nucl-ex/0207006 • More information in http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/brahms

  26. The BRAHMS Collaboration I.G. Bearden7, D. Beavis1, C. Besliu10, Y. Blyakhman6,J. Bondorf7, J.Brzychczyk4, B. Budick6, H. Bøggild7, C. Chasman1, C. H.Christensen7, P. Christiansen7, J.Cibor4, R.Debbe1, J. J. Gaardhøje7, K. Grotowski4, K. Hagel8, O. Hansen7, H. Heiselberg7, A. Holm7, A.K. Holme12, H. Ito11, E.Jacobsen7, Jipa10, J. I. Jordre10, F. Jundt2, C. E. Jørgensen7, T.Keutgen9, E. J. Kim5, T. Kozik3, T.M.Larsen12, J. H. Lee1, Y. K.Lee5, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3, A. Makeev8, B. McBreen1, M. Murray8, J.Natowitz8, B.S.Nielsen7, K. Olchanski1, D. Ouerdane7, R.Planeta4, F.Rami2, C.Ristea10, D.Roehrich9, B. H. Samset12, S. J. Sanders11, R.A.Sheetz1, Z.Sosin3, P. Staszel7,T.S. Tveter12, F.Videbæk1, R.Wada8 and A.Wieloch3, S.Zgura10. 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA2IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France3Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland 4Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland 5Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA 6New York University, USA 7Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 8Texas A&M University, College Station, USA 9University of Bergen, Norway10University of Bucharest, Romania 11University of Kansas, Lawrence,USA 12 University of Oslo Norway J.H. Lee (BNL)

  27. Backup Slides J.H. Lee (BNL)

  28. pT and centrality dependent pbar/p ratios at y=0 BRAHMS Preliminary R=0.78+-0.01 (0-10%) R=0.81+-0.03 (40-60%) • The ratio for central events(0-10%) are almost flat over 0.5<pt<3.5GeV/c. • R(central)~R(peripheral) J.H. Lee (BNL)

  29. MRS particle identification : TOFW • 125 slats: time of flight resolution ~ 75psec • p/K separation ~ up to 2.5 GeV/c • K/p separation ~ up to 4 GeV/c • Cherenkov counter will be installed for identifying higher pT particles (p/K separation: up to 8 GeV) J.H. Lee (BNL)

  30. PID in Back Forward Spectrometer : RICH PID up to p=25 GeV/c (can go higher changing pressure) J.H. Lee (BNL)

  31. 95° 30° 2.3° 30° 15° Hardware additions for Run3 Second TOF C4 Trigger (for track and d(p)A and pp) More Si and reconfiguration J.H. Lee (BNL)

  32. Event Characterization: Collision Centrality Determination • Measured by the Centrality Detector (SiMA+TMA) • Corrected for Vertex position dependence • Minimum-biased multiplicity: Data + MC (HIJING+GEANT) • BB Multiplicity is used for the centrality determination for BB analysis (consistent with SiMA+TMA selections) • Npart is calculated using HIJING SiMA TMA

  33. R (proton/neutron) in Models J.H. Lee (BNL)

  34. Multiplicity:dNch/dh at SNN=200 GeV • Centrality bins shown are for 0-5%,5-10%, 10-20%,…, 40-50%. (Statistical errors only) • Systematic errors ~ 8-10% • SiMA: -3 < h < 3 • Beam-Beam Counter: 2 < |h| < 4.7 • Consistent with measurements using reconstructed tracks in TPC at y = 0 Published in PRL 88 (2002) J.H. Lee (BNL)

  35. H1 & C1 C1 π threshold PID in Front Forward Spectrometer : ToF + C1 pion vetoed by C1 ToFH1 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  36. Comparison to models UrQMD Hijing J.H. Lee (BNL)

  37. BRAHMS Preliminary: 200 GeV 10% Central Inverse pT Slope vs. mass • All fits are in pT: over same range for all particles, at all rapidities • Negative  Positive • Inverse slope decreases as y increases • Flow at all covered rapidities J.H. Lee (BNL)

  38. HBT:Rapidity-Dependent Transverse Source Size Measurements J.H. Lee (BNL)

  39. Particle Ratios:centrality and pt dependence • No centrality dependence in range 0-20% • No transverse momentum dependence J.H. Lee (BNL)

  40. Spectra BRAHMS Preliminary: 200 GeV 10% Central y = 3 y = 0 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  41. p and pbar yields Y = 0 Y = 2.9 Y = 0 Y = 0.8 BRAHMS Preliminary SNN=200 GeV: 10% Central • pbar Yield =10.5 0.8 (Inverse pt slope =325.517.29) • proton Yield = 33.7 1.8 (Inverse pt slope = 341.8 13.8 J.H. Lee (BNL)

  42. Models, models… • HIJING: emphasis on purturbative QCD processes leading to multiple mini-jet production from parton scattering (X.Wang and M.Gyulassy Phys. Rev. D (1991) 3501) • AMPT: (A Multiphase Transport Model) HIJING to generate the initial phase space of parton, then extends to quark-gluon to hadronic-matter transition and the final hadron interaction (B. Zhang, C.M. Ko, B. Li, Z.Lin Phys. Rev. C 61 (2001) 067901) • UrQMD: hadronic + string including all known resonances (S.A.Bass et al. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41 (1998) • FRITIOF: string dynamics + LUND. Hadron behaves like relativistic strings with confined color field (H.Pi, Comp. Phys. Comm. 71 (1992) ) • … J.H. Lee (BNL)

More Related