Interpretations of the orleanist monarchy aka louis philippe
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 6

Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 46 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe). www.educationforum.co.uk. Traditional Interpretation. The traditional interpretation has been an adapted Marxist one LP’s regime seen as a ‘bourgeois monarchy’

Download Presentation

Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Interpretations of the orleanist monarchy aka louis philippe

Interpretations of the Orleanist Monarchy (aka Louis Philippe)

www.educationforum.co.uk


Traditional interpretation

Traditional Interpretation

  • The traditional interpretation has been an adapted Marxist one

  • LP’s regime seen as a ‘bourgeois monarchy’

  • 1830 seen as the final victory for the bourgeoisie after a short ‘Indian summer’ for the Aristocracy 1815-30

  • Capitalism and industrialisation allowed to develop and thrive under LP’s policies and France run like a massive joint stock company by a narrow oligarchy of capitalists


Revisionism

Revisionism

  • Revisionists have put forward a very different model.

  • Pinkney suggests that 1830 was a victory for lawyers, bureaucrats and Bonapartists NOT a recognisable capitalist class – only a change of personnel at the top not a seismic shift

  • Cobban points out that leading figures in the regime were actually landowners not industrialists and that Guizot followed an economic policy of protectionism not free trade


Revisionism 2

Revisionism 2

  • Revisionists like Pinkney have also challenged the idea of a vibrant and growing capitalist economy – sluggish economic growth and patchy industrialisation

  • Also that Orleanist elites behaved like aristocrats mimicking their chateaux and lifestyles – not a assertive new ruling class at all

  • Also that the bourgeoisie was too heterogeneous to be recognised as a class with class interests – intra class conflicts between different sectors – financiers clashed with railway capitalists – iron, coal and cotton producers wanted protection from foreign trade – silk wine and shipping capitalists wanted free trade


Arguments for marxist interpretation

Arguments for Marxist Interpretation

  • Ruthless repression of socialism and trade unionism reveals true class nature of the regime

  • Divisions within the elite actually point to the strength of their dominance rather than at any weakness

  • Regime presided over most rapid industrialisation despite the fact it may have appeared ‘sluggish’ when compared to GB


Reading

Reading

  • Read Magraw pages 51-63

  • Rally write robin on a large sheet of display paper evidence supporting Marxist interpretation and evidence supporting revisionist interpretations

  • By the end of the lesson be prepared to state and justify which interpretation you favour


  • Login