Loading in 5 sec....

Computer Implementation of Genetic AlgorithmPowerPoint Presentation

Computer Implementation of Genetic Algorithm

- 117 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Computer Implementation of Genetic Algorithm

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Computer Implementation of Genetic Algorithm

By:

Moch. Rif’an

Computer Implementation

- The principle of meaningful building blocks is simply this:
- The user should select a coding so that short, low order schemata are relevant to the underlying problem and reltively unrelated to schemata over fixed position.

Computer Implementation

- The second coding rule, the principle of minimall alphabets, is simply stated:
- The user should select the smallest alphabet that permits a natural expression of the problem

Computer Implementation

Chromosome A

10110010110011100101

Chromosome B

11111110000000011111

Chromosome A

1 5 3 2 6 4 7 9 8

Chromosome B

8 5 6 7 2 3 1 4 9

- Binary Encoding – Most common method of encoding. Chromosomes are strings of 1s and 0s and each position in the chromosome represents a particular characteristic of the problem.
- Permutation Encoding – Useful in ordering problems such as the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). Example. In TSP, every chromosome is a string of numbers, each of which represents a city to be visited.

Computer Implementation

Chromosome A

1.235 5.323 0.454 2.321 2.454

ChromosomeB

(left), (back), (left), (right), (forward)

- Value Encoding –Used in problems where complicated values, such as real numbers, are used and where binary encoding would not suffice.
Good for some problems, but often necessary to develop some specific crossover and mutation techniques for these chromosomes.

Computer Implementation

- Tree Encoding –This encoding is used mainly for evolving programs or expressions, i.e. for Genetic programming.
- Tree Encoding - every chromosome is a tree of some objects, such as values/arithmetic operators or commands in a programming language.

( + x ( / 5 y ) )

( do_until step wall )

Citation:

http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Aeronautics-and-Astronautics/16-888Spring-2004/D66C4396-90C8-49BE-BF4A-4EBE39CEAE6F/0/MSDO_L11_GA.pdf

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation

Citation: examples taken from: www.genetic-programming.com/c2003lecture1modified.ppt

- minimization rather than maximization
- Transform from minimization to maximization problem:
- Multiply the cost function by a minus one (insufficient)
- Commonly used:

Computer Implementation

- A problem with negative utility function u(x) value in maximization, transform fitness according to the equation:

Computer Implementation

- Linear scaling
- To ensure each average population member contribute one expected offspring to the next generation

Computer Implementation

- To control the number of offspring given to the population member with maximum raw fitness.
- cMult=the number of expected copies desired for the best population member. For typical small population (n=50 to 100) a cMult=1,2 to 2 has been used successfully

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation

- Sigma () truncation:
- Using population variance information
- c is choosen as reasonable multiple of population standard deviation (between 1 and 3)
- Negative result (f’<0) are arbitrarily set to 0

Computer Implementation

- Tidak suka
- Gunakan
- Carefully control the range and precision of the decision variable. The precision:

Computer Implementation

- Single U1 parameter
- 0000 umin
- 1111 umax

- Multiparameter Coding (10 parameter):
- 0001| 0101|…|1100|1111|
- U1 | U1 |…| U1 | U1 |

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation

- Minimize g(x)
- Subject to bi(x)≥0 i=1,2,…,n
- Where x is an m vector
- Tranform to the unconstraint form:

Computer Implementation

The traveling salesman must visit every city in his territory exactly once and then return to the starting point; given the cost of travel between all cities, how should he plan his itinerary for minimum total cost of the entire tour?

TSP NP-Complete

Note: we shall discuss a single possible approach to approximate the TSP by GAs

Computer Implementation

A vector v = (i1 i2… in) represents a tour (v is a permutation of {1,2,…,n})

Fitness f of a solution is the inverse cost of the corresponding tour

Initialization: use either some heuristics, or a random sample of permutations of {1,2,…,n}

We shall use the fitness proportionate selection

Computer Implementation

{0,1,#} is the symbol alphabet, where # is a special wild cardsymbol

A schema is a template consisting of a string composed of these three symbols

Example: the schema [01#1#] matches the strings: [01010], [01011], [01110] and [01111]

Computer Implementation

The order of the schema S (denoted by o(S)) is the number of fixed positions (0 or 1) presented in the schema

Example: for S1 = [01#1#], o(S1) = 3

for S2 = [##1#1010], o(S2) = 5

The order of a schema is useful to calculate survival probability of the schema for mutations

There are 2 l-o(S)different strings that match S

Computer Implementation

The defining length of schema S (denoted by (S)) is the distance between the first and last fixed positions in it

Example:for S1 = [01#1#], (S1) = 4 – 1 = 3,

for S2 = [##1#1010], (S2) = 8 – 3 = 5

The defining length of a schema is useful to calculate survival probability of the schema for crossovers

Computer Implementation

m(S,t) is the number of individuals in the population belonging to a particular schema S at time t (in terms of generations)

fS(t) is the average fitness value of strings belonging to schema S at time t

f(t) is the average fitness value over all strings in the population

Computer Implementation

Under fitness-proportionate selection the expected number of individuals belonging to schema S at time (t+1) is m (S,t+1) = m (S,t) ( fS(t)/f (t) )

Assuming that a schema S remains above average by 0 c, (i.e., fS(t) = f(t) + c f(t) ), then

m (S,t) = m (S,0) (1 + c)t

Significance: “aboveaverage” schema receives an exponentially increasing number of strings in the next generation

Computer Implementation

The probability of schema S (|S| = l) to survive crossover is ps(S) 1 – pc((S)/(l – 1))

The combined effect of selection and crossover yields

m (S,t+1) m (S,t) ( fS(t)/f (t) ) [1 - pc((S)/(l – 1))]

Above-average schemata with short defining lengths would still be sampled at exponentially increasing rates

Computer Implementation

The probability of S to survive mutation is:

ps(S) = (1 – pm)o(S)

Sincepm<< 1, this probability can be approximated by:

ps(S) 1 – pm·o(S)

The combined effect of selection, crossover and mutation yields

m (S,t+1) m (S,t) ( fS(t)/f (t) ) [1 - pc((S)/(l – 1)) -pmo(S)]

Computer Implementation

Short, low-order, above-average schemata receive exponentially increasing trials in subsequent generations of a genetic algorithm

Result: GAs explore the search space by short, low-order schemata which, subsequently, are used for information exchange during crossover

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation

Computer Implementation