The Political Economy of Care
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 33

The Political Economy of Care PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 59 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Political Economy of Care. Three Questions. What is care work and why is it important? Where do motivations for care come from and what are their consequences? How are motivations for care linked to changing social norms of masculinity and femininity?.

Download Presentation

The Political Economy of Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The political economy of care

The Political Economy of Care


The political economy of care

Three Questions

What is care work and why is it important?

Where do motivations for care come from and what are their consequences?

How are motivations for care

linked to changing social norms of masculinity and femininity?


The political economy of care

The “care sector” of the economy has unique characteristics—both for workers and for consumers.

Shift from the family to the

market and the state has contradictory consequences for social inequalities and role of the welfare state.

(a.k.a. dilemmas of patriarchal capitalism)

Motivations for a “care movement” --

empowerment of women, fertility decline, but increased pressure on the quality of care services.


The political economy of care

What is Care?

The American Heritage Dictionary gives two definitions of the verb that seem positive.

1. To be concerned or interested.

2. To provide needed assistance or watchful supervision.

But as a noun, the definitions are rather negative:

1. A burdened state of mind, as that arising from heavy responsibilities; worry.

2. Mental suffering; grief.

To be concerned or interested, it seems, is to assume a burden.

cura

soin

cuida

внимательность

zorg

προσοχή  

obacht


The political economy of care

Care Work Defined

Direct care work involves provision of services to another person in a

face-to-face or

hands-on

or first-name relationship

that implies some

emotional connection and concern

for that person’s well being.

Direct care work can be paid or unpaid, market or non-market, male or female.

Recipients often dependents—but sometimes also healthy adults.

Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation:

not a dichotomy, but a continuum.


The political economy of care

Historical Trends and Stylized Facts

Increases in women’s labor force participation have been associated with a

decline in time devoted to family care.

Many women have moved into paid provision of care—

teaching, nursing, child

care and elder care.

Non-market work remains quantitatively significant in all the advanced industrial countries.


The political economy of care

The Decline of Full-time Homemaking in the U.S., 1870-2000

HomemakersWomen inHomemakers as

as % of allpaid jobs as% of all workers

women workers% of all womenworkers

187070.2%29.8%40.1%

190064.435.635.6

193059.740.334.1

196056.044.029.1

199032.767.322.0

200029.570.516.4


The political economy of care

The Rise of Professional Care Service

Industries in the United States

(Employment by Industry as a Percentage of TotalEmployment)

ProfessionalDomesticAgricultureManufacturing,

Careand PersonalFishingMechanical, and

ServicesServicesForestryConstruction

1870----53.5%22.7%

1900 4.0% 9.3%37.630.1

1930 7.110.721.731.6

196011.9 6.6 9.431.4

199017.6 4.0 2.825.1

199819.2 3.4 2.722.7


The political economy of care

Intrinsic AND extrinsic motivation.

Love, obligation, reciprocity, and pay—all sources of “utility.”

Norms and preferences of care may be influenced by biology

but they are also socially constructed and at least partially endogenous.

Neither the workers who provide care (the “supply side”) nor the consumers who

receive care (the “demand” side) behave in ways that fit the traditional model of

neoclassical economic theory.


The political economy of care

Worker Motivation

Consumers


The political economy of care

Market Failures

limited consumer sovereignty

(information problems, agency problems, monitoring problems)

social preferences (altruism and obligation)

endogenous preferences (emotional stickiness, cultural construction)

coordination problems

externalities


The political economy of care

“Care” Promises Quality


The political economy of care

Intrinsically Motivated Care:

Benefits for “Consumers”

a.k.a. children, elderly, patients, students…

General:

High quality—long-term commitments and reduced need for monitoring;

“incentive-enhancing preferences”

Low cost—resulting from “compensating differentials”

Specific:

In short run, inelastic response to risk of poverty, stress, pay reduction, speed-up, deterioration in working conditions, or reduction in “payoff”


The political economy of care

Prisoners of Love

“I didn’t expect this and I didn’t want it, but my heart’s involved now.”

(A grandmother, describing her care for her grandson.)

“I love them. That’s all, you can’t help it.”

(Paid caregivers, describing their feelings toward many of their clients.)

The results rather more complicated than a “compensating differential.”

Alone from night to night you’ll find me

Too weak to break the chains that bind me,

I need no shackles to remind me,

I’m just a prisoner of love

lyrics by Leo Robin, 1931


The political economy of care

Liabilities for Workers

(primarily women)

General:

“Costly” preferences,

reduced bargaining power (hold-up)

Specific:

Increases likelihood of paternal abandonment and patriarchal control.

Contributes to “double-day” for women

working for pay.

Encourages occupational segregation and “pay penalty” in jobs that require nurturance


The political economy of care

Coordination Problem

Specialization in caregiving is addictive and costly. Difficult to establish

property rights over children or other public goods created by care. Bargains

not enforceable;

Caregivers can anticipate and seek to reduce their vulnerability.


The political economy of care

Origins of Patriarchal Systems

Patriarchal systems use physical force, property rights, and cultural norms to

force women to “overspecialize” in care.


The political economy of care

Capitalism Slowly Weakens Patriarchy…

Wage employment is

based on individual

market work, not

family work

Both wage employment and fertility

decline empower women.

Women

engage in

collective

political action.


The political economy of care

but Remains Dependent on It…

Caring for dependents cannot

be completely shifted to the market.

“Family wage” rules reinforce

traditional gender norms and

encourage breadwinner/homemaker family.

The “welfare state” socializes at least

some of the costs of caring for dependents.

The nation-state takes on many of the

responsibilities of the family: education,

old-age security, and most recently,

explicit subsidies for parents.


The political economy of care

Capitalism Represents Itself as Masculine


The political economy of care

And the “Nanny State” as Feminine

Capitalism liberates caregivers but penalizes care.

Women are offered an unpleasant choice: either take on disproportionate responsibilities for care, or don’t commit to caring relationships.

Meanwhile, competition among countries (and regions), as well as firms, create pressures to lower the cost of care.

“Welfare states” are described as soft, weak, and uncompetitive.


The political economy of care

Family Policy: A Neoliberal Dilemma

Capitalist institutions need families but would prefer not to pay for them.

Coordination problem: how to prevent

free-riding?

Note analogy with natural environment:

e.g. capitalism needs a stable climate,

but would prefer not to pay for that either.

International competition

intensifies pressure to offload or externalize costs to non-market sectors.


The political economy of care

Outsourcing?


The political economy of care

Automation?


The political economy of care

Changing Gender Norms

Do you strongly agree, agree,

disagree, or strongly

disagree:

“It is better if the man is the

achiever and the woman takes

care of home and family.”

In 1977, 2/3 of Americans

polled agreed.

In 1998, about 1/3 agreed.


The political economy of care

Does Buffy ever babysit? Xena, Warrior Princess, frozen in ice for twenty years after her daughter was born.


The political economy of care

Kill Bill 2. Motherhood demands accommodation. But, in general, avoiding care responsibilities is easier than…


The political economy of care

Norms of

masculinity are changing,

albeit rather slowly.

Will labor market inequalities between

men and women be

replaced by

inequalities between

parents and non-parents?


The political economy of care

“Marketization”

“Defamilialization”

Increases in women’s labor force participation have been associated with a

decline in time devoted to family care.

Many women have moved into paid provision of care—

teaching, nursing, child

care and elder care.

Movement away from intrinsic toward more extrinsic motivation.

Family care still quite important—what is likely to happen to it in the future?


The political economy of care

Economic Implications of Defamilialization

(and/or reduction in relative importance of intrinsic motivation)


The political economy of care

Is there a way to reconfigure the care sector?

public provision

shared care in home

empowerment of care workers


  • Login