Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 15

Drug use and social exclusion: the implications for policy PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Drug use and social exclusion: the implications for policy. Dr Aileen O’Gorman School of Applied Social Sciences University College Dublin [email protected],ie. Scottish Drugs Forum Drug problems and poverty – the poor relations? 22 June 2006. Key issue.

Download Presentation

Drug use and social exclusion: the implications for policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Drug use and social exclusion:

the implications for policy

Dr Aileen O’Gorman

School of Applied Social Sciences

University College Dublin

[email protected],ie

Scottish Drugs Forum

Drug problems and poverty

– the poor relations?

22 June 2006


Key issue l.jpg

Key issue

Drug use is a widespread social phenomenon. Yet, ‘problem drug use’ is concentrated in socially and spatially excluded neighbourhoods.


Key questions l.jpg

Key questions

  • What is a drug problem?

  • Why ‘social exclusion’?

  • How are socially excluded neighbourhoods created?

  • What is the ‘lived experience’ of a socially excluded neighbourhood?

  • What is the relationship between living in a socially excluded environment and developing a drug problem?


Risk environments for problem drug use 1 l.jpg

Risk environments for problem drug use (1)

  • Educational disadvantage

    • Primary level(34% - 51%)

    • Early school leaver(36% - 72%)

    • 3rd level education( 2% - 20%)

  • Unemployment

    • ‘joblessness’(54% - 76%)

    • long-term (51% - 73%)

  • Imbalanced social class composition

    • Professionals(0.4% - 4%)

    • ‘Unclassified’(13% - 45%)


Risk environments for problem drug use 2 l.jpg

Risk environments for problem drug use (2)

  • High population density

    • Total population(5,500 – 32,000)

    • 15-29 age group(25% - 40%)

  • Population instability (-11% - + 22%)

Cumulative & interconnected variables

Dynamic of social exclusion in a risk environment


The meaning of drug heroin use l.jpg

The ‘meaning’ of drug (heroin) use

  • Part palliative, part ‘buzz’

  • Gives structure and routine to their day

  • Gives status, identity, respect

you've nothing to do, you're bored silly, you haven't even got your pride, you don't know who you are when you've no work. At least if you're an addict it's something, ‘I'm a junkie’ do you know what I mean. You don't have worries when you're on it you know, you're just - you're happy. You don't know whether you're happy ‘cos you're sitting there watching Coronation Street or ‘cos you're stoned out of your head. And that's, that's the truth you know It just takes the worry away.


Risk environment o gorman 2005 l.jpg

RISK ENVIRONMENTO’Gorman (2005)

Drug

Careers

Policy & Political Context


Interpreting the evidence l.jpg

Interpreting the evidence

Could have been interpreted as a culture of poverty, an underclass …. Instead found:

  • the ‘means’ may be different (constrained by lack of ‘legitimate’ opportunities) the desired ‘ends’ similar

  • Lethal combination of social exclusion and cultural inclusion - a surfeit of American values [of consumption] (cf. J. Young)

  • Compensating for exclusion by (over) identifying with the trappings of mainstream culture (cf. C. Nightingale)


Policy implications l.jpg

Policy Implications?


The policy cycle alcock et al 2004 3 l.jpg

The Policy Cycle Alcock et al. (2004:3)

Identification of social need

  • Policy Proposals

Evaluation of policy & effects

Implementation


Analysing the policy discourse l.jpg

Analysing the policy discourse

  • Dominance of neo-liberal, ‘new right’, ideology – the culture of poverty thesis; welfare dependency; different values from mainstream - the underclass analysis

  • Stress on personal failings, family dysfunctions etc. (rather than a failing of the economic and political system)

  • Communities of poor people treated as social problems (rather than a product of inequalities)

  • Focus on crime and anti-social behaviour; drugs presented as the threat (rather than being symptomatic of other issues)


Implications for policy l.jpg

Implications for policy

  • Focus of drugs policy shifts from public health and harm reduction policies to law enforcement & supply control

  • Criminalisation of social policy - social control rather than social care becomes the dominant policy concern

  • Drug users subjected to control and surveillance through the drug treatment system, the criminal justice system, and the welfare system

  • Moralisation of drugs and social policy – only those willing to be reformed and rehabilitated will be included and assisted. Others will be punished (benefits cut; ASBOs; prison; homeless).


Policy response based on evidence l.jpg

Policy Response based on evidence

  • Solutions to drug problems cannot be found in drug policies alone

  • The failure to take broader social, cultural, political and economic context into account in explaining why people living in poor and excluded neighbourhoods develop drug problems means that drug policies are continually compromised

  • A focus on ‘reforming’ and/or ‘rehabilitating’ the individual and/or the community is not enough

  • Need to focus on structural change and ‘drug proofing’, other public and social policies, such as:

    • Housing policies (design, management, allocation)

    • Urban planning and regeneration programmes

    • Economic/Employment policies

    • Education policies


Policy responses l.jpg

MEDIUM TERM

Social care rather than social control

Interconnected services for interconnected needs

Treatment – drug user as a patient rather than deviant

Community development approach to drugs work

LONG TERM

Tackle inequalities

Universal policies and services

Education - equality

Housing – design, management and allocation policies

Wealth distribution

Policy responses?


References l.jpg

References

Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). (1998). Drug misuse and the environment. London: HMSO.

Currie, E. (1993). Reckoning: Drugs, the cities, and the American future. New York: Hill and Wang.

Lewis, O. (1968). ‘Culture of poverty’ in D. P. Moynihan (ed.) On understanding poverty: Perspectives from the social sciences. New York: Basic Books.

Lloyd, C. (1998). ‘Risk factors for problem drug use: identifying vulnerable groups’, Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 5, (3), p217-232.

MacGregor, S. (2003). ‘Social exclusion’, in N. Ellison & C. Pierson (eds,) Developments in British social policy. (2nd ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, p57-74.

MacGregor, S. (1996). Drugs policy, community and the city. Occasional paper, School of Sociology and Social Policy, Middlesex University.

Murray, C. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

Nightingale, C. (1993). On the edge. New York: Basic Books.

O’Gorman, A. (2005). Drug Use and Social Exclusion: the development of heroin careers in risk environments PhD Thesis. Middlesex University

O’Gorman, A. (2000). ‘Researching the social exclusion - problematic drug use nexus’ in J. Fountain (ed.) Understanding and responding to drug use: The role of qualitative research. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) Monograph. Luxembourg: EC Official Publications, p137-142.

O’Gorman, A. (1998). ‘Illicit drug use in Ireland: An overview of the problem and the policies’, International Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 1, p.155-166.

Pearson, G. & Gilman, M. (1994). ‘Local and regional variations in drug misuse: The British heroin epidemic of the 1980s’ in J. Strang & M. Gossop (eds.) Herion addiction and drug policy: The British system, Oxford: OUP p102-120.

Rhodes, T. (2002). ‘The ‘risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug related harm’, International Journal of Drug Policy, 13 p85-94.

Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity. London: Sage.


  • Login