1 / 18

March 2011 Lena Konovalenko Department of Systems Ecology Stockholm University

Element cycling in aquatic ecosystems – modelling general and element-specific transport and accumulation mechanisms. March 2011 Lena Konovalenko Department of Systems Ecology Stockholm University. Main Supervisor: Clare Bradshaw : Stockholm University. Second Supervisors:

bat
Download Presentation

March 2011 Lena Konovalenko Department of Systems Ecology Stockholm University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Element cycling in aquatic ecosystems – modelling general and element-specific transport and accumulation mechanisms. March 2011 Lena Konovalenko Department of Systems Ecology Stockholm University Main Supervisor: Clare Bradshaw: Stockholm University Second Supervisors: UlrikKautsky: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB) Linda Kumblad: Stockholm University

  2. Project • Objectives • Development of dynamic compartment model for radionuclide transport in a coastal marine ecosystem (Baltic Sea) • Prediction of radionuclide concentrations in the various parts of marine ecosystem

  3. Methodological approaches for modelling of radionuclide migration in aquatic ecosystems: Physicaltransport compartment models are the most commonly used; they are briefly represented and discussed in Monte, (2009) and SKB (2004). Biogeochemical models have been developed and reported in [Dittrich et al., 2009], but they have a high degree of complexity and demand huge amount of input parameters. Biologicalmodels describe radionuclide transport through the biotic environment considering processes Many models have been verified for the isotopes Cs-137 and Sr-90, and less research has carried out for other isotopes.

  4. Study region and selected site Aerial photo of the planned area for the spent fuel repository at Forsmark. (Figure from www.skb.se ) Sketches of the future final repository for spent nuclear fuel below ground. (Figure from www.skb.se )

  5. The partitioning of the Forsmark coastal area into subbasins (SBs) with labelling of the major basins. 11.5 km2

  6. Food web illustration depicting the links among Baltic Sea communities

  7. The ecosystem perspective

  8. Element /radionuclide model • The radionuclide flow was assumed to follow the flow of organic matter, • but radionuclide-specific mechanisms such as: • radionuclide uptake by plants • excretion of radionuclides by animals • adsorption of radionuclides to organic surfaces, • were connected to the carbon model to account for the differences between the dynamics of carbon and the radionuclides

  9. The arrows in the figure illustrate the flow of the contaminating element Benthic plants Phytoplankton Zooplankton Photic zone Macrograzers Fish Benthos Element intake and uptake DIM PM Water exchange Primary producer Element adsorbtion to surface from DIM Air exchange Consumers Respiration Faeces, excretion and excess

  10. Compartment model of C N P transport in coastal ecosystem • Software tools • The simulations of element dynamics were executed using two software packages for intercomparison: • Matlab/Simulink with the Pandora package • Ecolego http://ecolego.facilia.se/ecolego/show/Downloads Pandora Ecolego

  11. Bioconcentration Factor BCF=Cbiota/Cwater Figure 1. Comparison predicted bioconcentration factor (BCF) (m3/kgC) by probabilistic simulation for marine grazers/macrograzers (median 50%, 5% and 95% percentiles) and experimental mean BCF data for marine crustaceans with minimum and maximum values. Figure 2.Comparison predicted bioconcentration factor (BCF) (m3/kgC) by probabilistic simulation for marine benthos (median 50%, 5% and 95% percentiles) and experimental mean BCF data for marine filter feeders with minimum and maximum values.

  12. Figure 3.Comparison predicted bioconcentration factor (BCF) (m3/kgC) by probabilistic simulation for marine fish (median 50%, 5% and 95% percentiles) and experimental mean BCF data for marine fish with minimum and maximum values. Figure 4.Comparison predicted bioconcentration factor (BCF) (L/kg ww) by probabilistic simulation for marine zooplankton (median 50%, 5% and 95% percentile) and experimental available BCF data from four different sources: ERICA – data base, SKB 2010 – /report TR-10-08/, SKB 2008 – /report TR-08-09, App. 22/, IAEA – /report IAEA 1985/ .

  13. Mesocosm study October 2008 - 9 • Other researchers within the research group at Systems Ecology have for the last 5 years been done, such as using experimental ecosystems (mesocosms) to study the transport and fate of environmental contaminants, including radionuclides, in Baltic Sea ecosystems.

  14. The data from these experiments is complex and multidimensional and often complicated to interpret. Models used: a) to evaluate the experimental results; b) to test how these results may be altered under different scenarios (e.g. increased temperature, presence of a toxin, presence or absence of a predator etc).

  15. Questions

More Related