1 / 19

Konigsberg Nine AU Update

Konigsberg Nine AU Update. John Bolte IV, PhD The Ohio State University Injury Biomechanics Research Laboratory. Scientific Symposium on Injury Biomechanics Research. Konigsberg Bite Plate 9AU System. Laptop - NI Labview. Parallel Data Converter. Battery. Amplifier/ Encoder.

baruch
Download Presentation

Konigsberg Nine AU Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Konigsberg Nine AU Update John Bolte IV, PhD The Ohio State University Injury Biomechanics Research Laboratory Scientific Symposium on Injury Biomechanics Research

  2. Konigsberg Bite Plate 9AU System Laptop - NI Labview Parallel Data Converter Battery Amplifier/ Encoder National Instruments – Digital I/O Card 9 AU Bite Plate

  3. Bite Plate & Mouth Guard

  4. Calibration block X ^ ^ ^ +0.577 i – 0.577 j + 0.577 k q = 54.7o Z Y

  5. Test Plan • Static test at four positions • -x, y, z, • 0.577 Gs • Shaker table test at two frequencies • (0.577 Gs) • 25 Hz • 1000 Hz • Rotation table test (future work) • Low angular acceleration • High angular acceleration

  6. Static Calibration 5 seconds each position Position #1 -X Position #2 +Y Position #3 +Z Position #4 +0.577 i – 0.577 j + 0.577 k

  7. Sampling Rate

  8. Skew Interval

  9. Static Test Pos #1 Pos #2 Pos #3 Pos #4

  10. Static Test – Position #4 0.577

  11. Error – Static Test Channel #1 – X 6.8% Channel #2 – Y 9.2% Channel #3 – Z 13.0% Channel #4 – X 5.7% Channel #5 – Y 5.8% Channel #6 – Z 1.1% Channel #7 – X 3.9% Channel #8 – Y 2.2% Channel #9 – Z 10.6% average Gs 0.577 Gs % error =

  12. Shaker Table Test

  13. Shaker Table Test at 25 Hz0.577 *1.65 Gs = 0.95 Gs

  14. Error – Shaker Test @25 Hz Correlation Amplitude Factor* – 0.577 0.577 E = % error = Channel #7 – X A = .581 E = 0.6% Channel #8 – Y A = .558 E = 3.4% Channel #9 – Z A = .637 E = 10.6% * Time series analysis

  15. Shaker Table Test at 1000 Hz0.577 *14.4 Gs = 8.3 Gs

  16. Trade-offs • Small size vs. Accuracy Sampling rate • Wireless vs. Skew interval • Low cost vs. Durability accelerometers

  17. Alternatives? • Threshold data recording • Higher sampling rates • Head data ~ 1,000 Hz • DTS G5 data acquisition • More durable accelerometers

  18. Follow-On Work? • Angular acceleration testing • 9 AU angular acceleration calculation check • PMHS head drops • PMHS “boxing punch” • IRB approval for human boxing use • Human use experiment development • Boxing test

  19. Thank-You

More Related