1 / 15

Monitoring, data validation and verification

Monitoring, data validation and verification. Performance Indicators Defined. • Health Center: Performance Earnings = (Σ Services * Unit fees) * % Quality 14 PHC indicators + 10 HIV indicators; unit fees $0.18-$8.90, measured monthly

barton
Download Presentation

Monitoring, data validation and verification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monitoring, data validation and verification

  2. Performance Indicators Defined • Health Center: • Performance Earnings = (Σ Services * Unit fees) * % Quality • 14 PHC indicators + 10 HIV indicators; unit fees $0.18-$8.90, measured monthly • 111 composite indicators (1,058 data elements) across 14 services/departments, measured quarterly • Case-based Reimbursement/Fee for Service type • Unit value for each Service • Hospital PBF model: • Balanced score card approach: (2009) 59 composite indicators, over 350 data elements • Annual global prospective budgets between $59K- $315K • Transparent peer-evaluation mechanism

  3. PBF Control is NOT ‘business as usual’ in data gathering

  4. Systems in place • Internal Controls by health facilities and District teams: • Quantity • Quality • Sometimes complemented by ‘External Controls’ i.e. from outside the District. • Protocols exist for counter-verifying Quality and Quantity data.

  5. Health Center Quantity Control • Facilities report their monthly indicators to the district PBF steering committee • District controller passes by and checks: the quantity/volume of activities are assessed (PHC & HIV) • content • verifies in the various register books and patient files whether the amounts claimed are consistent with the documentation in the registers. • A monthly invoice is prepared by every health center

  6. Monthly basic health service PBF invoice

  7. Health Center Quality Control • The Quality Supervisory Tool consists of 14 elements • Once unannounced evaluation per quarter • Each element checks: • basic package of health services, • general administration. • The structural and process indicators are based on the Rwandan clinical practice guidelines. • There are 118 composite indicators, leading to a final composite quarterly quality score for each Health Center • Quantity * Unit cost * % Quality leads to the amount to be paid as performance to the HC;

  8. Services and Weights Used to Construct the Quality Score for PBF Formula

  9. Quality evaluation tool

  10. Data audit and validation • Data audit are executed for both quantity and quality PBF indicators • Data audits are • Internal (district) by a rapid evaluations; • Or externally by a third party company. • Rounds of contra-verification are executed for PBF quantity and quality indicators through a contract with a third party agency • National community client satisfaction surveys are carried out nationwide • elicit feedback from clients on the quality of services rendered • deter health workers from reporting phantom patients

  11. M&E/Payment • (validated Quantity * Unit cost) * % Quality leads to the amount to be paid as performance to the HC; • A district PBF Steering Committee meet to validate the data and the invoice; • The District Mayor send the consolidated bill of all the districts health facilities to the MOH • The payment is proceed directly into the bank account of the health facility

  12. M&E/Supporting Mechanisms • A TWG and an Extended team approach has been put in place • as a coordination structure • cover all districts, • included PBF focal points from the MOH, NGOs • Monthly half day meetings, with short duration intense workshops • to operationalize the new national PBF model, • to plan the supervisions together • assess the needs

  13. Challenges • Process of building consensus on indicators is hard • No systematic control atcommunitylevel

More Related