1 / 8

Land Glaciers Landcover Fire

Issues and remarks (synthesis after presentations and discussion). Land Glaciers Landcover Fire. URD’s / PSD’s. URD‘s: Clear differentiation between URD and PSD is feasible for terrestrial ECV‘s Should be developed further, later in phase 1. Demo dataset is proposed to

bart
Download Presentation

Land Glaciers Landcover Fire

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Issues and remarks (synthesis after presentations and discussion) LandGlaciersLandcoverFire

  2. URD’s / PSD’s • URD‘s: • Clear differentiation between URD and PSD is feasible for terrestrial ECV‘s • Should be developed further, later in phase 1. • Demo dataset is proposed to • Tool for re-itteration with community; „Do we match expectations?“ • Show users practically result of URD/PSD exercise • Get feedback and clarify potential missunderstandings (e.g. accuracy definition)

  3. CCI merit • Qualitative statement on comparison of current state of the art products and CCI products are existing for all projects. • No single place for user to see additional merit. • Proposed to make a conscise summary in workshop report in form that can be given to public (« What is CCI and what is merit of products ») • Action: Each ECV to provide one sentence describing this

  4. Consistency • Joint assessment of different ECV‘s is considered to be useful (e.g. Fire/Aerosol/GHG) • ECV users of data between ECV projects must communicate their needs/expectations clearly what would be needed for such an exercise (user only workshop? / CMUG) • Ask the wider user community

  5. Consistency • Consistency with Aerosol is considered to be most important at the current stage by Land ECV‘s • Rec: Golden year needed Table incomplete!

  6. Data processing • Terrestrial variables somehow unique in terms of spatial resolution • Inconsistencies in data pre-processing recognized • Need for a common L1 pre-processing (geometric and atmos. correction) is emphazized  mid term • [A]: L2 comparison • [A]: agree on common projection

  7. Consistency / implementation • Near term: different to achieve consistency in the current phase • Mid term: • What is best approach to achieve consistency? • Example: ozone for ATCOR; better to use ozone product or use ECMWF ozone incorporating ozone CCI data? • Development of a strategy needed

  8. AOB • Need for a common data portal is expressed • Longterm data provision unclear

More Related