1 / 1

A specific body of knowledge?

FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITY STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK. A Functional Community?. Q1. A specific body of knowledge?. Potential /. Q2. Driven by Government policy?. Emerging. No. Q3. A horizontal mandate / membership?. Functional. Q4. Recognized by TBS / CPSA?. Communities. Yes. Rated Criteria.

bart
Download Presentation

A specific body of knowledge?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITY STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK A Functional Community? Q1 A specific body of knowledge? Potential / Q2 Driven by Government policy? Emerging No Q3 A horizontal mandate / membership? Functional Q4 Recognized by TBS / CPSA? Communities Yes Rated Criteria Impacts Scoring Functional Community Ready? 1 2 3 4 5 Ability to Work With FC Moderate Risk Low Risk Q5 Have a Secretariat / Governance Structure? High Risk CSPS Cost Recovery Q6 Funds available for initial design (blended)? High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Product Quality Q7 Subject matter specialist available? High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Understanding Learning Needs Q8 Competency requirements known? High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Functional Business Case / Financial Viability? Community Training Volumes <200 500 to 1000 5000+ Q9 Number of FC members? Priorities Ongoing Courses Req'd Low Churn Moderate Churn High Churn Q10 Degree of recruitment / retention in FC? Redesign Workload Low Stability Moderate Churn High Stability Q11 Course content stable over time? Course Uptake Low Affordability Highly Affordable Q12 Tuition fee affordable? > In-Progress * Ability to Meet $ Targets High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Q13 Ability to achieve CSPS breakeven? > In Standby ** > Under Consideration CSPS Ready? Design / Delivery Capacity High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Q14 CSPS staff expertise available? Design Capacity High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk External design expertise available? Q15 High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Delivery Capacity Q16 Delivery expertise & facilities available? Delivery Capacity High Risk Moderate Risk Low Risk Q17 Internal CSPS interim funding available? Notes : * In-Progress -- Needs identification is complete and course design is underway. ** In Standby -- Functional Community will potentially be considered for CSPS activities at a later date.

More Related