1 / 15

Gene Davis TD Solutions Division M&S Technical Manager J7, Joint Warfighting Center

Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group Training Gaps Analysis Forum (TGAF) Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference. Gene Davis TD Solutions Division M&S Technical Manager J7, Joint Warfighting Center U.S. Joint Forces Command. Agenda. Purpose TGAF Background

Download Presentation

Gene Davis TD Solutions Division M&S Technical Manager J7, Joint Warfighting Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group Training Gaps Analysis Forum(TGAF) Worldwide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference Gene Davis TD Solutions Division M&S Technical Manager J7, Joint Warfighting Center U.S. Joint Forces Command

  2. Agenda • Purpose • TGAF Background • M&S Training Issues Discussion • Top M&S Issue Quad Charts • Breakdown of Needed Resources

  3. Purpose • To provide the Joint Modeling & Simulation Capability Working Group an update on the genesis of the TGAF, the issues arising from the forum, and discuss the Top M&S issues.

  4. TGAF Background (1) Background Formerly met as the Joint Training Review Group (JTRG) Reconvened Nov 24 - 25, 2008 at JFCOM as TGAF with same charter and membership as JTRG TGAF collected the top M&S training issues from stakeholders Additionally TGAF updated terminology and reprioritized the 35 TC AoA Gapswith COCOM/Service concurrence as Training Needs Provided top TGAF Issuesand actions 4

  5. TGAF Background (2) Outcomes Continue to work with stakeholders to update training needs and capabilities Complete plan to include POM by WJTSC 09-2 Actions Briefed the TGAF M&S strategy and process at WJTSC 09-1 March 09 Submitted M&S issues in FY11 Program Review Package, issues fell below the line, will resubmit for FY12 Provide input for the Training Community M&S Business Plan 5

  6. Top M&S Issues from Nov ‘08 TGAF • Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) • Exercise Design, Conduct and Integration • Cross Domain Information Sharing (CDIS) • Joint Logistics • Note: Air Ops issue rolled into IAMD 6

  7. Integrated Air and Missile MissionTN # 7: Provide multi-command missile defense training Need:CCDRs require a distributed, integrated, synthetic Missile Warning (MW) and Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) training and exercise modeling and simulation (M&S) capability that stimulates real world display systems that is dynamic, portable, scalable and affordable. In the operational world, the Missile Mission area occurs accurately and seamlessly. Missile Mission functional training occurs in isolation (i.e. lacks the big picture) and lacks synergy. This results in a dysfunctional team where true teamwork does not occur and each function is only looking at its individual area and not the mission as a whole. Therefore, each mission area is trained individually. Additionally, there is no cross functional technical training capability that allows for fully integrated, dynamic training across COCOMs and Services within the Joint Training Environment. TGAF Issue #1, USSTRATCOM (w/USNORTHCOM) Potential Solutions: Currently Unknown Through the “All Things Missile” (ATM) initiative, USSTRATCOM w/ USJFCOM J7/J8 support will complete the functional needs analysis completed May 09. The functional solutions analysis and analysis of alternatives will be complete NLT Nov 09. All findings will continue to be vetted and prioritized among the COCOM and Service ATM stakeholders with MDA support. Milestones Estimated Cost • Intent is to establish ATM as a Program of Record • Unfunded estimated total cost is $10M • Training Requirements Analysis- completed May 09 • Technical Requirements Analysis-NLT Sep 09 • Initial draft ATM ICD, an annex to the current IAMD ICD - Dec 09 8

  8. Breakdown of Needed Resources Integrated Air and Missile Mission 9

  9. Exercise Design, Conduct & IntegrationTN # 3: Provide faster/higher fidelity Mission Rehearsal Potential Solutions: Need: • Maintain/Sustain JTLS (funds for FY10 • approved, seeking additional funds for FY11 and beyond) • 2. Enhance JECS and JLOD • 3. Develop way ahead for JLVC CORE Capability Low cost, small footprint training capability that is modular and can be tailored based on training requirements for large exercises and home station training day to day. Capabilities that support home station staff training that are light-weight and can be operated by existing staff for individual and collective training TGAF Issue #2, USPACOM Milestones Estimated Cost • Establish modular JLVC Federation that can scale to support a range of needs and requirements (12 Months) • Implement the ability to stimulate Joint C2 Systems to reduce exercise support and footprint cost. (12 months) • Deploy light-weight staff training capabilities that provide Joint Context within DoD sites—in progress with initial capability. • Develop way ahead for NEXTGEN capability– in progress 10

  10. Breakdown of Needed Resources Exercise Design, Conduct & Integration 11

  11. Cross Domain Information SharingTN #2 :Train forces in a JIIM environment Potential Solution: Need:Ability to share mission critical C2ISR data and training environment data with coalition partners and US DoD/Interagency partners at different security levels. Currently, US is unable to share joint training environment simulation data (HLA, DIS, TENA formats) with mission partners in multiple theaters due to network security and information sharing policy and lack of secure network interface infrastructure. TGAF Issue #3, USEUCOM Develop a Cross Domain Information Sharing (“guard”) training capability with correct rule set to allow sharing of mission critical simulation data with mission partners. Estimated Cost Milestones • Conduct and document front end analysis • Develop Training Use cases ( AC-10, HOA)–in progress • Establish CDIS COI ( COCOM/Service)—in progress • Host CDIS Summit/PAT– TBD Oct 09 12

  12. Breakdown of Needed Resources Cross Domain Information Sharing $800K $600K $600K $600K $600K $0 $400K $500K $600K $800K $1 M $800K $800K $600K $600K 13

  13. Joint LogisticsTN # 6: Train forces on realistic logistics requirements including RSOI Need: Solution: • TCAoA Gap #14: Train forces on realistic logistics- Specifically Strategic Level Force Flow and Sustainment in support of TRANSCOM and COCOM Training Audiences • Support TRANSCOM migration to Integrated Data Environment Global Transportation Network Convergence (IGC) to ensure realistic training • Enhance Force Flow capabilities to include Retrograde Operations • TGAF Issue #4, USTRANSCOM Enhance JDLM-DESS Capabilities to stimulate IGC during JLVC Spiral Development. Enhance JDLM and Maneuver Simulations within the JLVC to support Retrograde Operations in JLVC Spiral. Milestones Estimated Cost 14

  14. Breakdown of Needed Resources Joint Logistics EFFORT FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 (R&D) LOG Devel $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800K $800K $800K $800K $800K (O&M) JLVC Design (OP) JLVC Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 15

  15. UNCLASSIFIED Questions? QUESTIONS? 16 UNCLASSIFIED

More Related