- By
**barr** - Follow User

- 98 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Trajectory' - barr

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Trajectory

### Two Good Ways to Find Distinct Developmental Trajectories

### Nagin & Jones’ PROC TRAJ

### Individual Growth Curves of Continuous Outcome

### Trajectories Based on an Indicator

### Trajectories in Health Psychology

### Two Examples of Trajectory Analysis

### The Average Child? Try to Find Them!

### ADHD Trajectories (unsuccessful)Only one group resembles the mean

### Children with RAP, Recurrent Abdominal PainGrand Means Are Deceiving

### How do we find trajectories?Rejecting a 4-trajectory solution

### Three Common Trajectories for CSI

1. Physics. The path of any body moving under the action of given forces . . . especially the curve described by a projectile in its flight through the air. [O.E.D.]

Multimedia Physics Studios

Cluster Analysis of Cases

- Cluster analysis of cases “dissects” a sample into distinct groups of individuals.
- It takes a sample and makes a pie chart.
- Clusters are a categorical variable. Everyone becomes a 1, 2 or 3.
- Generally not discovering “God-given” categories
- Constructing a data-based typology

- Muthen2 Growth curve mixture modeling with MPLUS
- http://www.statmodel.com/index2.html
- Nagin & Jones PROC TRAJ

http://www.ncovr.org/docs/Special_Project/Trajectory/index.htm

Free download from Carnegie Mellon.

Easily installed.

Runs as a SAS PROC

Produces trajectorycharts automatically

Parsimonious

Model published in Psychological Methods(1999, 2001)

Many studies injuvenile justice

Two-group logistic model from CM WWW site.

Basic Readings

- Helgeson, V.S., et al., Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association., 2004. 23(1): p. 3-15.
- Jones, B.L., D.S. Nagin, and K. Roeder, A SAS Procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods and Research, 2001. 29: p. 374-393.
- Nagin, D.S., Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 1999. 4(2): p. 139-157.

Trajectory Analysis vs. Longitudinal HLM

Different

- HLM, pre-existing groups
- TRAJ, discover groups
- HLM, confirmatory
- TRAJ exploratory
- HLM, powerful general purpose tool
- TRAJ, interesting special purpose tool

Similar

- Individual growth curves
- Model based, within children & between children
- Iterative software
- Graphic results, not just p values

Distress of child i at time t

Distress(i,t) = βi0 + βi1t+ βi2t2 . . .

β0 the intercept, the score at time zero

β1 the linear slope, indicating a constant increase or decrease over time

β2 is the quadratic slope indicating a curve of acceleration or deceleration

Individuals with missing observations can be included

Proc TRAJ goes up to degree 5

Polynomial ApproximationJust a description

- Polynomials can approximate almost any shape
- Monte Carlo curves
- Random betas
- Time4

How PROC TRAJ Works

Each child has an observed trajectory

Each trajectory has an approximate model description

Each child is described by several numbers

Cases can be sorted into clusters by the several numbers

Nagin developed the statistical theory

Jones wrote PROC TRAJ software (free download)

Membership in a delinquent group at a given time (No, Yes)

Well-done example of trajectory analysis with PROC TRAJ

N = 287 women surviving cancer

Inattentive ADHD Symptoms in a High Risk Group N = 267 school children

Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP) in children with no medical diagnosis

- Children, K to 4
- 243 school children “at risk”
- 68% boys
- At risk for ADHD
- MD diagnosis
- Teacher screen or
- Followed 3 years
- Teacher ratings
- Inattentive symptoms
- Six or more is positive

The average child with ADHD gets somewhat better over 3 years

Bickman, Wolraich, Lambert & Simmons in prep

One size fits none

- Clinical chronic 61%
- Starts clinical (6 or more)
- Slight improvement
- Clinical improving 30%
- Starts clinical
- Remission by 1 year
- Subclinical
- Starts normal
- Stays normal

CSI trajectories for entire sample (means and standard deviations)

“Children with RAP improve briefly then stay the same at a moderate level for 4-5 years.”

Is that what this chart really says? (Note Std Dev)

Let’s try PROC TRAJ.

Group Size Prob.

1 (21.2%) .

2 (67.1%) 0.0004

3 ( 1.7%) 0.0022Gp 3 tiny

4 (10.0%) 0.0874Gp 1-Gp 4 nonsig

Four clusters not acceptable because there are not 4 distinct clusters. In addition, cluster 3 is too small.

Knowing when to stop . . .

Example of a 3 Group ModelPROC TRAJ

Group Parameter Estimate Prob > |T|

1 Intercept 15.44068 0.0000

Linear -0.68666 0.0002

Quadratic 0.01047 0.0002

2 Intercept 42.87414 0.0000

Linear -2.42765 0.0000

Quadratic 0.03429 0.0000

3 Intercept 33.74592 0.0000

Linear 0.65764 0.1630

Quadratic -0.00597 0.4160

Long term risk

Short term risk

Low risk

** p < .01

*** p < .001 one-way ANOVA

Try to Explain the Trajectories with Ordinary Analysis (oneway ANOVA, regression, chi2 etc)Theory based > Fishing

Comparison of Characteristics by CSI Symptom Trajectory Group

OK, Officer, we’re fishing for a hypothesis. We’ll test it with fresh data.

Like cluster analysis or exploratory factor analysis, TRAJ needs cross validation

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..