1 / 11

Evaluation and Assessment

Evaluation and Assessment. Mike Fleming. Assessment. can be source of disagreement and tension implications for a Framework of reference for Languages of Education . Purposes in relation to. Classroom teachers Policy makers Employers Parents Learners. Tendencies.

barbra
Download Presentation

Evaluation and Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation and Assessment Mike Fleming

  2. Assessment • can be source of disagreement and tension • implications for a Framework of reference for Languages of Education

  3. Purposes in relation to • Classroom teachers • Policy makers • Employers • Parents • Learners

  4. Tendencies • the assessment of learning where reliable, objective measures are a high priority • assessment for learning, implying a more formative approach where there is much more emphasis on feedback to improve performance

  5. Tensions Broad Narrow Subjective Objective

  6. Accountability • ‘policing’ of standards or • sharing perceptions and fostering understanding • role of assessment in helping raise achievement and improve learning

  7. The ‘ideal’ • Reflect full complexity of language as subject • Motivate learners • Provide useful and reliable information for employers and policy makers

  8. The challenge • Complexity of aims and content • Significance of context • Potential influence on the curriculum • Implications of LE and LAC

  9. Possible approaches • Common ‘standards’ conceived as levels • Minimum statement of desirable level of achievement, e.g. at school leaving age

  10. Questions • Should ‘standards’ be inclusive and comprehensive or selective? • Broad descriptors or atomised statements?

  11. Key consideration • It may not be so much the framework or system that is the key factor but how the framework or system is actually used in practice that is the key to influencing standards.

More Related