Has the eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the eu
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 46

Has the Eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the EU?’ PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 76 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Has the Eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the EU?’. Roger Vickerman Professor of European Economics Dean, Brussels School of International Studies. Global Skills Lecture 18 February 2013. The Crisis and Economic Coordination.

Download Presentation

Has the Eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the EU?’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Has the eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the eu

Has the Eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the EU?’

Roger Vickerman

Professor of European Economics

Dean, Brussels School of International Studies

Global Skills Lecture

18 February 2013


The crisis and economic coordination

The Crisis and Economic Coordination

  • Crisis shows need for international consensus and coordination

  • Has the EU failed to achieve this internally and externally?

  • Can we only have solidarity in the good times – when is the EU not a zero-sum game?

  • Can the new architecture of ESM and EFSF do any better than the Stability and Growth Pact?

  • Is completion of EMU with a fiscal as well as a monetary union a credible development?

  • How does that affect the non-members of the Eurozone?

  • Are we on the road to a multi-speed European Union?


Many europes

Many Europes


Why monetary integration

Why monetary integration?

  • Completing the Single Market

  • Currencies as non-tariff barriers

    • Transaction costs of exchange

    • Cost of hedging future currency expectations

    • Lack of transparency in prices

  • The Single Financial Market

    • Increased efficiency from a single financial sector

    • Common banking rules

    • Common interest rates to avoid market distortions

  • Effective macro-stabilisation policy – the one size fits all problem

    • No exchange rate adjustment

    • No setting of independent interest rate


The economic theory

The Economic Theory

  • Optimal Currency Areas

  • Basic question is about exchange rates

    • Flexible exchange rates

      • adjust to cope with asymmetric shocks

    • Fixed exchange rates

      • exchange rates cannot adjust to deal with asymmetric shocks/productivity differentials/inflation differentials

      • adjustment has to come through other markets

      • requires common monetary policy

      • thus output/employment adjusts

      • but adjustment less if certain criteria are met

      • what about fiscal policy?


Optimal currency area theory

Optimal Currency Area Theory

  • Six criteria for an OCA

    • Labour mobility (Mundell)

    • Product diversification (Kenen)

    • Openness (McKinnon)

    • Fiscal transfers

    • Homogeneity of preferences

    • Solidarity

The scoresheet:

NO

YES

YES

NO

MAYBE

???


Is the eu an oca

Is the EU an OCA?

  • Insiders and outsiders

    • the converged, the converging and the unconverged

    • the EU may not be an OCA, but is a subset of the EU an OCA?

    • does this imply that some should go it alone (a multi-speed union), and does this matter?

    • has the cost of entry been too great for some relative to the perceived benefits (e.g. Greece, Portugal)?

    • has entry led to uncontrollable problems (e.g. Ireland, Spain)?

    • has the entry of others subverted economic advantage (e.g. Germany, Netherlands, Austria)?

    • and what about the effect on the outsiders (UK, Denmark, Sweden, Poland, Hungary etc)?


The eu practice

The EU Practice

  • The Maastricht Treaty convergence criteria:

    • the achievement of price stability – a low rate of inflation close to the best performing states (defined as being within 1½ per cent of the average of the three lowest);

    • sustainability of the government financial position – the government should not run a financial deficit greater than 3 per cent of GDP, and gross general government debt should be less than 60 per cent of GDP;

    • exchange rate stability – apparent by the observance of the normal fluctuation margins provided by the Exchange Rate Mechanism, for at least two years; and

    • durability of convergence – convergence of long-term interest rates (defined as being within 2 per cent of the average long-term interest rate of the three lowest inflation states).

  • Note how these ‘monetary’ criteria differ from the ‘real’ criteria of OCA theory


Fiscal implications

Fiscal implications

  • In Eurozone fiscal decisions left to national governments

  • But governments can ‘cheat’ on fiscal responsibilities – get round tight monetary policy by looser fiscal policy

  • Hence need for a mechanism to control cheating – Stability and Growth Pact to reinforce Maastricht fiscal criteria

  • SGP has Excessive Deficit Procedure to ‘fine’ miscreants

  • But can EDP work effectively if:

    • Slow to initiate

    • Big countries can subvert it

    • Fines make the position of weaker economies even worse

  • Need for better early warning system – the ‘Cologne process’ – implies willingness to share budgetary plans


The deficit bias problem

The deficit bias problem

  • Monetary and fiscal policy must be consistent

  • Should criteria be relaxed?

    • balance over cycle?

    • political and credibility implications

  • Fiscal indiscipline concerns financial markets:

    • raises borrowing costs

    • markets can distinguish between countries (credit ratings affect risk premia)

  • More serious is the risk of default in one member country:

    • capital outflows and a weak Euro

    • pressure on other governments to help out

    • pressure on the ECB to help out

  • The ‘no-bailout’ clause

    • was it ever credible?


The onset of the crisis

The onset of the Crisis

  • The origins of the crisis

    • Financial markets and ‘sophisticated’ instruments

    • Toxic assets and asset price bubbles

    • Who was to blame?

  • How to respond

    • Tax cuts or increased expenditure?

    • On what?

  • Who has been more prudent?

    • Scale of public expenditure boost

    • Debt – and who holds it?

  • The collapse of world trade and confidence?


Warning signs

Warning signs


Asset price bubbles

Asset price bubbles


Asset price bubbles1

Asset price bubbles

Source: European Commission


The credit crunch

The credit crunch

Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2012


Debt composition and trends gdp

Debt composition and trends (% GDP)


Europe s fiscal problems

Europe’s fiscal problems

Source: European Central Bank, Monthly Bulletin October 2012


Europe s fiscal problems1

Europe’s fiscal problems


The consequences

The consequences

  • Unsustainable deficits imply excessive borrowing

  • Where borrowing is international has two consequences:

    • Raises cost of borrowing

    • Devalues currency

  • But within Eurozone no devaluation option so risk premium rises - interest rate spreads on sovereign debt

  • Speculators lose power to gain from currency fluctuations, so speculate on debt – risk premium: pick off weakest first and then move along the row of dominos

  • Note this is exactly what happened to the old Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992

  • But now net effect is to weaken entire currency

  • Countries outside Eurozone partially protected as can still offer currency fluctuation option – but only up to a point


Government bond yields

Government bond yields


But is the spread related to debt

But is the spread related to debt?

Source: De Grauwe and Ji, Jnl of Common Market Studies, November 2012


A structural break

A structural break?

  • De Grauwe and Ji argue that there was a structural break 2008. Before 2008 markets underestimated risk, after 2008 they may have overestimated risk coming from a high debt/ GDP ratio. And that overestimate is cumulative like a bubble effect.

Source: De Grauwe and Ji, Jnl of Common Market Studies, November 2012


Exchange rate consequences

Exchange rate consequences

Source: European Central Bank, Monthly Bulletin October 2012


Stock market consequences

Stock market consequences

Source: European Central Bank, Monthly Bulletin October 2012

Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2012


Real economy consequences

Real economy consequences

  • But this isn’t just about money and government debts

  • The output costs

    • Less government expenditure

    • Higher borrowing costs

    • Reduced values of wealth

  • Affects growth and employment

    • Trade and growth


Real economy consequences1

Real economy consequences


Real economy consequences2

Real economy consequences

Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2012


Real economy consequences3

Real economy consequences


Employment and unemployment

Employment and unemployment

Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2012


Unemployment rates

Unemployment rates


Unit labour costs and unemployment

Unit labour costs and unemployment

Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2012


Trends in world trade

Trends in world trade

Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast Autumn 2012


Trade consequences

Trade consequences


The twin deficits problem

The twin deficits problem


Policy responses

Policy responses

  • Spotting the problem:

    • a question of timing

    • what problems – is it like before

    • can we resort to old solutions

  • Is this the real price of globalisation?

  • Who is to blame: deficits vs surpluses

  • Do bail-outs work?

  • Will a European Stability Mechanism work any better?

  • Can the EFSF be funded?

  • And is there any real appetite for a fiscal union, on whose terms?


The new architecture the six pack

The new architecture – the six pack

  • Entered into force on 13 December 2011;

  • Five Regulations and one Directive (that is why it is called six-pack);

  • EU secondary law;

  • Applies to 27 MS with some specific rules for "euro-area Member States", especially regarding financial sanctions;

  • The six-pack does not only cover fiscal surveillance, but also macroeconomic surveillance under the new Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure.

  • In the fiscal field, the six-pack strengthens the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP)..

    • The six-pack ensures stricter application of the fiscal rules

    • Moreover, the six-pack operationalizes the debt criterion,

    • Financial sanctions for "euro-area Member States" are imposed in a gradual way


A banking union

A banking union

  • Single supervisory mechanism (SSM)

  • Direct bank recapitalisation through European Stability Mechanism (ESM)

    • Breaks link between banking problems and sovereign debt

  • Single resolution mechanism

    • Limit cost of bank failures to taxpayers

    • Swift action to resolve banking failures

    • Consistency in regulatory practices

  • Deposit guarantee mechanism

    • Harmonise deposit guarantees to give consumer confidence

  • Issues for Eurozone economies

    • Which banks are covered – assets >€30billion (or >20% national GDP) – excludes small local banks

    • But need for close cooperation between SSM and national regulators of smaller banks

  • Issues for non-Eurozone EU economies

    • Non-exclusion - critical for UK

    • Inconsistencies in regulatory practice


Has the eurozone crisis strengthened or weakened the eu

Source: European Council, Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union, December 2012 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/134069.pdf


Critique

Critique

  • Does new fiscal pact act quickly enough?

  • Should ECB be given more powers – e.g. Eurobonds, Banking Regulation?

  • Are there conflicts with the Single Market

    • Especially in the context of financial services?

    • The example of the Financial Transactions Tax

  • How will markets react in the medium term?

  • How will voters react in the medium term?

  • Can there be fiscal unity without further political integration?


Co ordinating action

Co-ordinating action

  • International financial stability and growth

    • The evidence

    • The incentive to cheat

  • International cooperation

    • The prisoners’ dilemma problem

    • Reducing informational asymmetry

    • Voluntarism or legal compulsion

    • Does the EU need a revised treaty?

    • International institutions and global federalism

  • How big could/should the EU grow?

  • What next?


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Has the EU finally resolved the problems arising from the financial crisis?

  • Has this been an economic problem, a policy problem or a (lack of) solidarity problem

  • If so who was to blame?

  • Has the cure been worse than the disease? And for whom?

  • Is there a better alternative?

  • Does this mean the end of an integrating Europe and the beginning of an officially recognised multi-speed Europe of a closely integrated EMU core with a set of loose trading arrangements surrounding it?

  • Where does the UK sit in this changing architecture?

  • What about Europe in the world?


Crisis what crisis

Crisis: what crisis?

“Europe will be forged in crises, and will be the sum of the solutions adopted for those crises” Jean Monnet


  • Login