Traditional learning theories
Download
1 / 35

Traditional Learning Theories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 231 Views
  • Updated On :

Traditional Learning Theories. Chapter 2. Traditional Learning Theories. Two major theoretical approaches S-R (stimulus-response) theories state that learning occurs through the association of environmental stimuli

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Traditional Learning Theories' - ballari


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Traditional learning theories2 l.jpg
Traditional Learning Theories

  • Two major theoretical approaches

    • S-R (stimulus-response) theories state that learning occurs through the association of environmental stimuli

    • S-S (stimulus-stimulus) theories state that learning involves recognizing when important events are likely to occur and understanding how to obtain these events

  • Anti-theoretical (methodological)


S r versus s s theories l.jpg
S-R versus S-S Theories

  • S-R theorists (Behaviorist)

    • inflexible view of behavior

    • stimulus environment controls behavior

    • very machine-like

  • S-S theorists (Cognitive)

    • somewhat flexible

    • internal processes control behavior

    • learn relationships which guides behavior


Slide4 l.jpg

Types of S-R theories

  • Reinforcement is necessary to learn an S-R association (Reinforcement)

    • Thorndike’s law-of-effect proposed that reinforcement was a necessity

    • Also, Hull’s S-R theory of learning was the culmination of this line of thinking

  • Reinforcement is not necessary to learn an S-R association (Contiguity)

    • Guthrie


Hull s reinforcement theory l.jpg
Hull’s Reinforcement Theory

  • Proposed that primary drives (e.g., hunger, thirst) are produced by states of deprivation

    • We have biological needs and corresponding psychological drives

      • we have a biological need for water that is accompanied by a psychological drive called thirst


Slide7 l.jpg


Slide8 l.jpg

SER

(S)

(R)


Slide9 l.jpg

  • Hull believed that the intensity of instrumental activity is determined by the combined influence of several factors

    • Drive (D), e.g., vampire thirst

    • Incentive (K), e.g., amount of blood reward

    • Habit strength (H), # of previously rewarded lever-presses

    • Inhibition (I), # of previously unrewarded rewarded lever-presses


Hull s formula l.jpg
Hull’s Formula: determined by the combined influence of several factors

SER = drive (D) * incentive (K) * habit (H) – inhibition (I)

SHR

SIR


Slide11 l.jpg

  • Excitatory potential is determined by: determined by the combined influence of several factors

    • Drive (D), the internal arousal state produced by deprivation (appetitive) or stimulation (aversive) , or stimuli associated with deprivation or stimulation.

    • Incentive motivation (K), the internal arousal produced by the reinforcer (e.g., it’s magnitude)

    • Habit strength (H), the strength of the connection between the stimulus and response.

    • Inhibition (I), suppression caused by previous responses failing to produce reward.


Sources of drive l.jpg
Sources of Drive determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Events that threaten survival activate the internal drive states

    • sex partner

    • predator

  • Some events that do not threaten survival may also activate the drive state

    • Highly desirable stimuli, like saccharin, activate drive states

      • It tastes good but has no caloric value

    • Highly aversive stimuli, like mild footshock, activate drive states

      • Mild footshock is aversive, but it does not threaten survival


Slide13 l.jpg

Innate Habits determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Habit strength can be

    • Innate: (SUR) or

    • Acquired through experience (SHR)

      • Habit strength increases each time a response produces drive reduction


Elimination of behavior l.jpg
Elimination of Behavior determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Unsuccessful behavior causes a drive to persist.

  • If drive persists, all behavior inhibited.

  • Reactive inhibition IR: the temporary inhibition of behavior due to the persistence of a drive state after unsuccessful behavior

  • Conditioned inhibition SIR: the permanent inhibition of a specific behavior as a result of the continued failure of that response to reduce the drive state.


Evaluation of drive theory l.jpg
Evaluation of Drive Theory determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Many of Hull’s ideas do accurately reflect important aspects of human behavior:

    • Intense arousal can reinforce behavior

    • Environmental stimuli can develop the ability to produce arousal, thereby motivating behavior (lead to Spence’s work on acquired drives)

    • Failure to distinguish learning and performance


Acquired drives l.jpg
Acquired Drives determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Acquired drive: an internal drive state produced when an environmental stimulus is paired with an unconditioned source of drive

    • This system works through classical conditioning

    • Spence, one of Hull’s students, developed this approach


Guthrie s contiguity theory l.jpg
Guthrie’s Contiguity Theory determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Guthrie proposed that contiguity, not drive reduction, was sufficient to establish an S-R connection.

    • He believed that learning is a simple process governed entirely by contiguity

    • Getting the response to occur (however this is done) in the situation was all that mattered

    • The last response to occur in the situation will be reproduced the next time


The impact of reward l.jpg
The impact of Reward determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Guthrie believed the last thing done in the old situation before the situation changed strengthened the S-R bond.

  • He believed that “stimulus change” produced learning. Rewards produce stimulus change


The impact of punishment l.jpg
The Impact of Punishment determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • If the response terminates the punishment, the response will become conditioned to the stimulus context in which the punishment occurred.

  • Guthrie believed that punishment will eliminates ongoing behavior only if response elicited by punishment is incompatible with the inappropriate response.

    • e.g., spanking produces responses incompatible with most other responses


The importance of practice l.jpg
The Importance of Practice determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Guthrie proposed that learning is not gradual but occurs in a single trial.

    • The strength of an S-R association is at maximum value after a single pairing of the stimulus and response.


Performance gradually improves l.jpg
Performance gradually improves: determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • 1) Subjects attend to only some of the stimuli present during conditioning trials.

  • 2) Many stimuli have to become conditioned to produce a particular response.

  • 3) All behavior are complex are consists of many separate responses. For the behavior to be efficient, each response element must be conditioned.


Breaking up a habit l.jpg
Breaking Up a Habit determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Guthrie believed that old habits could not be “forgotten”, but could only be replaced by a new habit


Three methods of breaking habits l.jpg
Three methods of breaking habits determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • 1) Fatigue method: The eliciting stimulus is presented so often that the person is so fatigued that the old habit cannot be performed. At that point, a new response will occur and a new S-R association will be learned, or no response will occur.

  • 2) Threshold method: the stimulus is presented at a level below threshold for eliciting the response. The intensity of the stimulus is gradually increased.

  • 3) Incompatible method: person is placed in a situation where the new habit replaces the old (Overcorrection)


Valuable ideas l.jpg
Valuable Ideas determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • 1) Punishment sometimes intensifies an inappropriate behavior when it elicits a behavior that is compatible with the punished response.

  • 2) Contiguity between a response and reward is critical to prevent acquisition of competing associations.

  • 3) Only a portion of the environmental stimuli are active at a given time.


Slide25 l.jpg

Bad Ideas determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • 1) Some actions are not reproduced even though substantial stimulus change followed the action.

  • 2) Reward predicts responses better than either frequency or recency (last response).

  • 3) All learning is not single trial learning.


Tolman s purposive behavior l.jpg
Tolman’s Purposive Behavior determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • When Tolman proposed his cognitive theory in the 1930s and 1940s, most psychologists preferred Hull’s mechanistic theory.

  • By the 1950s, the cognitive view started to gain supporters.


Flexibility of behavior l.jpg
Flexibility of Behavior determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Tolman proposed that behavior has both direction and purpose.

  • He believed that behavior is goal oriented.

    • We are motivated either to achieve a desired condition or to avoid an aversive situation.

  • He stated that certain events in the environment convey information about where our goals are located.

    • We can reach our goals only after we learn to read the signs leading to reward or punishment.


Learning or performance l.jpg
Learning or Performance? determined by the combined influence of several factors


Learning versus performance l.jpg
Learning versus Performance determined by the combined influence of several factors


Is reward necessary for learning l.jpg
Is Reward Necessary for Learning? determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Experience of two events is sufficient for learning (S-S)

    • Reward effects performance, not learning

  • The understanding of when events will occur can develop without a reward.

    • Presence of reward will motivate the organism to exhibit previously learned behavior.


Evaluation of purposive behavior l.jpg
Evaluation of Purposive Behavior determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Tolman’s work caused Hull to make changes in drive theory.

  • Once the ideas were incorporated into drive theory, Tolman’s work did not have a big impact on learning theory.

  • When drive theory developed problems in the 60s and 70s, cognitive approach gained wider approval


Skinner s methodological view l.jpg
Skinner’s determined by the combined influence of several factorsMethodological View

  • Skinner argued that the goal of behaviorism should be to identify and isolate the environmental factors that govern behavior.

  • He believed the goal of psychology was to predict and control behavior

    • Ability to do so depends on understanding the circumstances that govern the occurrence of the behavior


Some boxes l.jpg
“Some Boxes” determined by the combined influence of several factors


The importance of the environment l.jpg
The Importance of the Environment determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Most of Skinner’s research focused on the role of reinforcement.

    • Reinforcer: an event whose occurrence increases the frequency of the behavior that preceded the event.

    • Operant response: the behavior that controls the rate at which specific consequences occur.

  • Skinner’s work led to the development of Behavior Modification for treating behavior pathology.


The role of theory l.jpg
The Role of Theory? determined by the combined influence of several factors

  • Skinner argued that the use of “hypothetical constructs” does not contribute to our understanding of behavior.

  • Many psychologists do not agree with Skinner’s atheoretical approach.

    • They say that theory guides research and leads to new findings and uses for information.


ad