Longitudinal Diagnostics of Electron Bunches Using Coherent Transition Radiation
Download
1 / 22

Longitudinal Diagnostics of Electron Bunches Using Coherent Transition Radiation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Longitudinal Diagnostics of Electron Bunches Using Coherent Transition Radiation. Daniel Mihalcea. Northern Illinois University Department of Physics. Outline:. Fermilab/NICADD overview Michelson interferometer Bunch shape determination Experimental results Conclusions.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Longitudinal Diagnostics of Electron Bunches Using Coherent Transition Radiation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Longitudinal Diagnostics of Electron Bunches Using Coherent Transition Radiation

Daniel Mihalcea

Northern Illinois University

Department of Physics

Fermilab, Jan. 16, 2007


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Outline: Transition Radiation

  • Fermilab/NICADD overview

  • Michelson interferometer

  • Bunch shape determination

  • Experimental results

  • Conclusions


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Fermilab NICADD Transition RadiationPhoto-injector Laboratory

  • FNPL is a collaborative effort of several institutes and universities to operate a high-brightness photo-injector dedicated to accelerator and beam physics research.

  • Collaborators include:

U. of Chicago, U. of Rochester, UCLA, U. of Indiana, U. of Michigan, LBNL, NIU, U. of Georgia, Jlab, Cornell University

DESY, INFN-Milano, IPN-Orsay, CEA-Saclay


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

FNPL layout Transition Radiation

Michelson interferometer for longitudinal diagnostics


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Michelson Interferometer Transition Radiation

(University of Georgia & NIU)

Autocorrelation = I1/I2

- Molectron pyro-electric

- Golay cell (opto-acoustic)

Detectors:


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Interferometer Transition Radiation

Stepping motor

Scope

Detectors

ICT

Controller

Data Flow

Get Q

Get I1 and I2

LabView code:

  • Advances stepping motor between x1 and x2 with adjustable step size (50 m)

  • At each position there are N readings (5)

  • A reading is valid if bunch charge is within some narrow window (Ex: 1nC  0.1 nC)

  • Position, average values of I1 and I2 and their ’s are recorded.

  • Autocorrelation function is displayed.


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Basic Principle (1) Transition Radiation

Backward transition radiation

Ginsburg-Franck:

Detector aperture  1 cm


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Form factor Transition Radiation

related to longitudinal charge distribution:

Basic Principle (2)

Intensity of Optical Transition Radiation:

Coherent part  N2

To determine (z) need to know I() and the phase of f()

Kramers-Kröning technique


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Coherence condition Transition Radiation

Due to detector sensitivity:

Acceptable resolution:

Need bunch compression !


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Bunch Compression Transition Radiation

RF field in booster cavity

Energy-Position correlation

Electron bunch before compression

Tail

After compression

Head


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Kramers-Kröning method: Transition Radiation

Measurement Steps

FT

Ideal apparatus

K-K


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Molectron Transition Radiationpyro-electric detectors

Path difference (mm)

Frequency (THz)

Interference effect

Missing frequencies

Experimental results (1)


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Experimental results (2) Transition Radiation

Still need to account for:

  • low detector sensitivity at low frequencies

  • diffraction at low frequencies

  • absorption at large frequencies

Golay detectors: no problem with interference !


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Beam conditions: Transition Radiation

  • Q = 0.5 nC

  • maximum compression

Experimental results (3)

Interference

Apparatus response function:

Absorption

Diffraction

Low detector sensitivity


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Auto-correlation function: Transition Radiation

  • Q = 3nC

  • 9-cell phase was 3 degrees from maximum compression

Power spectrum:

  • Asymptotic behavior

    low frequencies:

    high frequencies:

  • Least square fit.

Experimental results (4)

Molectron pyroelectric detectors


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Experimental results (5) Transition Radiation

  • Molectron pyroelectric detectors

  • Kramers-Kroning method

Head-Tail ambiguity

Parmela simulation

Head

Tail


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Beam conditions: Transition Radiation

  • Q = 3.0 nC

  • moderate compression

Experimental results (6)

Golay cell

  • FT

  • Spectrum correction with R()

  • Spectrum completion for:

and

Start point

K-K

z  1ps


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Complicated bunch shapes Transition Radiation

Stack 4 laser pulses

Select 1st and 4th pulses (t 15ps)

After compression

Before compression

(Parmela simulations)


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Beam conditions: Transition Radiation

  • Q = 0.5 nC each pulse

  • 15 ps initial separation between the two pulses

  • both pulses moderately compressed

Experimental results (7)

Double-peaked bunch shapes

K-K method may not be accurate for complicate bunch shapes !


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

K-K method accuracy Transition Radiation

R. Lai and A. J. Sievers, Physical Review E, 52, 4576, (1995)

Generated

Reconstructed

K-K method accurate if:

  • Simple bunch structure

  • Stronger component comes first

Calculated widths are still correct !


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Other approaches Transition Radiation

Major problem: the response function is not flat.

1. Complete I() based on some assumptions at low and high frequencies.

R. Lai, et al. Physical Review E, 50, R4294, (1994).

S. Zhang, et al. JLAB-TN-04-024, (2004).

2. Avoid K-K method by assuming that bunches have a predefined shape and make some assumptions about I() at low frequencies.

A. Murokh, et al. NIM A410, 452-460, (1998).

M. Geitz, et al. Proceedings PAC99, p2172, (1999).

This work:

D. Mihalcea, C. L. Bohn, U. Happek and P. Piot, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 082801 (2006).


Longitudinal diagnostics of electron bunches using coherent transition radiation

Conclusions: Transition Radiation

  • Longitudinal profiles with bunch lengths less than 0.6 mm can

    be measured.

  • Systematic uncertainties dominated by approximate knowledge of response function and completion procedure.

  • Golay cells are better because the response function is more uniform.

  • Some complicate shapes (like double-peaked bunches) can be measured.


ad
  • Login