1 / 27

Removing the pump handle

Removing the pump handle. Formulating recommendations . It’s not always like that…. The investigation starts after the peak ‘It’s political’ We lack data There are no resources Nevertheless How do we ensure we learn from each investigation?. Field epidemiology . Programme management .

baka
Download Presentation

Removing the pump handle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Removing the pump handle Formulating recommendations

  2. It’s not always like that… • The investigation starts after the peak • ‘It’s political’ • We lack data • There are no resources Nevertheless How do we ensure we learn from each investigation?

  3. Field epidemiology Programme management The quality cycle of policy management Evaluate Assess Implement Plan

  4. The state of mind of the epidemiologist • Points that receive attention • Scientific evidence • Methodology • Points that may be overlooked • Programme constraints • Competing priorities

  5. The state of mind of the manager • Points that receive attention • Overall funding envelope • Political pressure • Press attention • Management • Points that may be overlooked • Evidence

  6. Maximizing the chances that evidence is used for action • Appreciate the point of view of the manager • Don’t flag problems • Provide solutions • Understand implications for resources allocation • Deliver useful recommendations * • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical * WHO CHOICE

  7. Attributes of good recommendations • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical

  8. Evidence based recommendations • Focus on the recommendations that may be proposed as per the results of the investigations • Leave aside -or present separately- general recommendations that are not direct deductions of your investigations • If a measles outbreak was caused by failure to vaccinate, proposing a cold chain review is useless and distracting

  9. Attributes of good recommendations • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical

  10. Specific recommendations • Focus • Small number • Ranked by order of priority • Describe the action to be taken • Use one verb by recommendation • Avoid “should” • Use imperative • Explain why it ’should’ de done • Avoid passive voice • Ask yourself: • What, Who, When and How?

  11. Example of specific recommendations • Avoid: • Meat should be safe • People should be educated • Prefer: • Cook the meat thoroughly • Communicate the specific risk associated with the manipulation of meat to hunters

  12. Attributes of good recommendations • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical

  13. Feasible recommendations • Do not recommend impossible actions • Consider • Logistics • System • Willingness / capacity to pay • Sustainability • Identify small steps that may be taken to improve

  14. Example of feasible recommendations • Avoid: • All GPs must participate in the surveillance system • Prefer: • Explore reasons for non participation to increase involvement • Engage GPs through useful and timely feedback

  15. Attributes of good recommendations • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical

  16. Cost effectiveness is the result you get for the input you provide • Measure costs • Effects must be worth the costs • Substantial burden • Effective intervention • Common sense may be used in the absence of quantified documentation

  17. US CDC: Which groups do NOT need routine vaccination against Hepatitis A? • Although persons who work as food handlers have a critical role in common-source foodborne outbreaks, they are not at increased risk for Hepatitis A because of their occupation. Consideration may be given to vaccination of employees who work in areas where community-wide outbreaks are occurring and where state and local health authorities or private employers determine that such vaccination is cost-effective. http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hav/havfaq.htm

  18. Attributes of good recommendations • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical

  19. Acceptable recommendations • The recommendation has to be acceptable to the decision makers and to the stakeholders • Politically • Culturally • Socially • Discuss draft with stakeholders • Improve acceptability • Create ownership

  20. Acceptable goals in food hygiene • Avoid: • Avoid vegetables • Prefer: • Wash vegetables thoroughly before consumption

  21. Attributes of good recommendations • Evidence based • Specific • Feasible • Cost effective • Acceptable • Ethical

  22. Ethical recommendations • Principles • Guarantee confidentiality • Ensure equity • Protect minorities • Address gender issues • Avoid stigmatization or finger-pointing • Example • Recommend case-based measles surveillance while pockets of hard to reach population still struggle with reporting of outbreaks

  23. Take home messages • Imagine yourself as a programme manager receiving the information • Be accountable to the usefulness of your recommendations

  24. Exercise • E-coli outbreak in South West England • Investigation: Crab meat associated with illness • Your recommendations?

  25. Review the two proposed recommendations according to the checklist

More Related