1 / 21

Spyros Alogoskoufis & Ann- RenÉe Guillemette

Experimental Economics 488. Spyros Alogoskoufis & Ann- RenÉe Guillemette. Commodity and Stock Markets. Initial Experiment Age and Experience in Both Markets Final Outcome: Size Manipulation: Small Markets = Commodities Large Markets = Stocks. The Question.

baird
Download Presentation

Spyros Alogoskoufis & Ann- RenÉe Guillemette

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experimental Economics 488 Spyros Alogoskoufis & Ann-RenÉeGuillemette

  2. Commodity and Stock Markets • Initial Experiment • Age and Experience in Both Markets • Final Outcome: • Size Manipulation: • Small Markets = Commodities • Large Markets = Stocks

  3. The Question • Is information incorporated faster and more equitably in a small or large market?

  4. Clarification • How we define “Faster” • Periods are in terms of transaction numbers and not seconds. • Justification • Excludes initial confusion • Compare similar observations - linear relationship between average transactions • Eliminates practical difficulties

  5. Expected Outcomes • Larger Market More Successful Than Smaller Market • Increased Competition - Breakdown of Collusion • More Information Available • By trading at a high volume, more information is discovered • Downside : Speculation of Price • Traders with information benefit • Faster Convergence Leads to Minimized Losses

  6. Instructions • Market Information • The experiment will consist of 16 rounds in total. One trial round will precede the experiment, in order for participants to familiarize themselves with the program • Each participant is assigned a group, A or B. In odd rounds, both groups will be in the market, whereas in even rounds, groups A and B will alternate. Groups A and B are of equal size. • In each round, certain individuals will randomly have some knowledge of the actual value of the good, and other will not. • Participants will each be given 5 shares. In order to avoid any restrictions on trading, there will be an initial endowment of 10,000 given to each trader. He or she can trade as much or as little as desired but must not have a negative holding of shares at any point during the trading round • Participants know their values for each round ahead of time. This does not affect results as each round is independent. • If information is given, the tabs will contain a random number between 100 and 1000, otherwise they will say “no information”. The “noise” of the value given will constantly be 40. This means that if the value someone is given is 800, the true value of the good is between 760 and 840.

  7. Instructions Cont. • Trading Program. • The trial round will allow each participant to familiarize him or herself with the computer program being used in the B74 Lab. The Z-Tree program allows us to simulate the market. The program is run by one main computer and is connected to all other sub-computers.  • Participants will open the program and be directed to a “market” screen where trading will take place. • Traders can place a bidding price to purchase shares from other traders or they can place an offering price to sell their own shares. In order to take up a trader on his “bid” or “offer” other traders have to select “sell” and “buy” respectively. • No transactions will take place when the market is closed (i.e. when the time in the upper right hand corner runs out). At the end of each round, an updated screen with ending market conditions will be posted. Participants will be able to observe their total gains from trading in each round. A time-series graph will show real-time prices.

  8. Data Analysis • Speed • Visual - Graphic Representation of Periods • Numerical - Measure of speed of conversion and testing • Equality • Profit per transaction • Overall profit. • All these observations are comparisons between the larger (odd) and smaller (even) markets.

  9. Graphs: Period 1 & 3 Actual Value: 399 Ending Value: 424 Actual Value: 781 Ending Value: 780

  10. Graphs: Period 5 & 7 Actual Value: 648 Ending Value: 540 Actual Value: 484 Ending Value: 499

  11. Graphs: Period 9 & 11 Actual Value: 507 Ending Value: 450 Actual Value: 872 Ending Value: 700

  12. Graphs: Period 2 and 4 Actual Value: 694 Ending Value: 674 Actual Value: 348 Ending Value: 350

  13. Graphs: Period 8 and 10 Actual Value: 394 Ending Value: 408 Actual Value: 796 Ending Value: 360

  14. Graph: Period 12 Actual Value: 363 Ending Value: 450

  15. Speed of Convergence • Observations: • Larger markets converge faster in terms of average transactions per person • Convergence: A series of consecutive transactions exists, such that individual transactions give a price within 10% of the actual value

  16. Summary of Larger MarketsEquality

  17. Summary of Smaller MarketsEquality

  18. Larger markets generate prices closer to the actual value

  19. Equality (Overall Profits) • Observations: • Equality and Profit distribution • Faster convergence linked to fewer profits • Profits distributed more equally in larger markets • Results not significant (observations and outliers)

  20. Limitations • Number of Rounds • Time Constraint • Personal Error in Data • Knowledge of Z-Tree • Class Members versus Outside Acquaintances • Repeated usage of the program leads to better execution of its functions • Focus Issue • Participants may lose concentration after several rounds

  21. Final Thoughts • Larger Markets are more equitable and converge faster than smaller markets • Possible Causes: • Increased Competition in terms of people with information • More information available (more likely to cause reactions) • Separating Equality from Speed • Though highly linked, “faster” does not guarantee “more equitably”

More Related