1 / 10

Controls Commissioning Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Oct 30, 2007

Controls Commissioning Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Oct 30, 2007. IOC Engineering Team Infrastructure and subsystems Integration Testing Lessons-Learned. EPICS Team. Ernest Williams Kristi Luchini Stephanie Allison (50%) Till Strauman (50%) Arturo Alarcon

baina
Download Presentation

Controls Commissioning Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Oct 30, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Controls CommissioningFacility Advisory Committee MeetingOct 30, 2007 • IOC Engineering Team • Infrastructure and subsystems • Integration Testing • Lessons-Learned

  2. EPICS Team • Ernest Williams • Kristi Luchini • Stephanie Allison (50%) • Till Strauman (50%) • Arturo Alarcon • Debbie Rogind (on loan from high-level apps) • Dayle Kotturi • Sheng Peng • Doug Murray • Stephen Schuh • Diane Fairley (on loan from high-level apps) • Judy Rock

  3. Infrastructure and Subsystems • Controls Network was simply a subnet of the Office enterprise network. • One big Channel Access Domain • Used different CA ports to segregate development and production network • All files needed by the control system were on AFS. • Easy access to files: development and production were in the same tree.

  4. Infrastructure and Subsystems (Cont’d) • Special AFS/NFS translator was used to provide NFS access to IOCs • Computer Infrastructure: • Boot Server based on the AFS/NFS translator. • Daemon Server: ran softIOCs and ChannelWatcher • Operator Consoles were managed by SCCS and used the AFS system as well. • OS: RHEL WS 4 (linux-x86) • EPICS: Version R3.14.8.2

  5. Infrastructure and Subsystems (Cont’d) • IOC Infrastructure (EPICS: Version R3.14.8.2) • Targets: • MVME6100 (VME64-X) – rtems 4.7.x • uC5282 (stand-alone) – rtems 4.7.x • linux-x86 (soft-IOCs) – linux rhel-ws4 • Serial port system to connect to all IOCs: • Watch the boot process and/or debug IOC • Remote power Cycle for all IOCs mostly in place. • IOC Health Monitoring needs work.

  6. Infrastructure and Subsystems (Cont’d) • Types of IOCs • SoftIOCs ran with high-reliability and uptime. • Number of softIOCs  ~12 • ColdFire (uC5282) IOCs: • BPMs are using the uC5282 and ran with high reliability especially with respect to Beam Synchronous Acquisition. (Qty  ~26) • LLRF are also using ColdFire and ran with good reliability. There is work to do to improve the beam synchronization acquisition. (Qty  ~28)

  7. Infrastructure and Subsystems (Cont’d) • Types of IOCs • VME-based systems worked fairly well this commissioning period. (Qty  ~40) • Issues related to timing receiver boards (i.e. are under investigation) • Camera system vulnerable to timing glitches • Magnet IOCs still not using EVR due to an issue with interrupts.

  8. Subsystems

  9. Integration Testing • A plan was implemented to get more controls test time. Typically, the schedule seems to always squeeze the control systems test time. • We instituted a plan to allocate one day every week for controls integration testing and checkout as part of the beam commissioning schedule. • Integration testing was performed in close coordination and cooperation from operations and physics.

  10. Lessons-Learned • Improve IOC Infrastructure and Management • Remote power cycle integration into EPICS for all IOCs • Standardized Test Plans to improve integration testing and coordination. (Optimize Testing schedule) • Move to production network to improve overall reliability and independence from office network. • Beam Synchronous Acquisition is very important for LCLS and uses the same infrastructure required for fast feedback. This infrastructure will be completed for LLRF, Toroids, and Bunch Length. • The systems that are using ColdFire + VME combination need to use a dedicated network and special driver for deterministic data transfer. Should not use Channel Access for this. • Configuration Management via relational database in the works • Not enough personnel resources to cover all systems.

More Related