Front range roundtable q2 13 meeting
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 21

Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting. May 31, 2012. Facilitated by:. Colorado’s Fire Seasons. Thousands of acres of wildfire per year (Total = 1.9 million acres of wildfire since 1995). Includes Hayman fire :

Download Presentation

Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Front range roundtable q2 13 meeting

Front Range Roundtable Q2-13 Meeting

May 31, 2012

  • Facilitated by:

Colorado s fire seasons

Colorado’s Fire Seasons

Thousands of acres of wildfire per year (Total = 1.9 million acres of wildfire since 1995)

Includes Hayman fire:

$200 million of costs from the Hayman Fire alone, which accounted for one-fifth of all acres burned that year (138k acres)

Includes Waldo (18k acres) and High Park (87k acres)

Includes Bobcat Gulch fire: 11k acres

Includes Buffalo Creek fire: 12k acres

Includes Fourmile fire: 6k acres

FRFTP formed



Five years of implementation

Sources: 1995 – 2010: Rocky Mountain Area and Coordination Center Annual Activity Report (2001-2004); Wildland Fire Activity by Cause, Combining Federal and Non-federal Agencies Within Each State (; 2011 – 2012:

Front range forests

Front Range Forests

  • 4.2 million acres of forestin the Front Range

  • 1.4 million in need of ecological restoration and fire risk mitigation

“Subalpine”: Lodgepole Pine and Spruce Fir

“Upper Montane”: Mesic Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer

“Lower Montane”: Dry Ponderosa pine and Dry Douglas fir

Definitions of front range life zones

  • Alpine

  • Sub-alpine

  • Upper Montane

  • Lower Montane

  • Lower Ecotone

Definitions of Front Range life zones

Front Range life zones

General elevations1

Example communities

Dominant overstory composition

Associated vegetation types


  • None

  • No trees

  • Grassy slopes and boulder fields

  • Sedges, mat and cushion plants, dwarf willows

  • Winter Park

  • Ward

~9,000-9,500’ to ~11,500’

  • Lodgepole Pine

  • Spruce/Fir

  • Bogs, meadows, ponds, rich in wildflowers

  • Mesic Ponderosa Pine

  • Mesic Mixed Conifer2

  • Some permanent meadows

~8,000’ to ~9,000-9,500’

  • Estes Park

  • Granby

~6,000’ to ~8,000’

  • Dry Ponderosa Pine

  • Dry Douglas-fir

  • Mountain-mahogany

  • Scrub Oak

  • Evergreen

  • Monument

  • Transition to Ponderosa Pine

  • Grassland

  • Mountain-mahogany

  • Scrub Oak

  • Boulder

  • Golden

~5,500’ to ~6,000’

1 Elevations noted are rough estimates – actual elevation limits depend on latitude, aspect, and other local factors; elevations generally lower in northern Front Range and on north-facing slopes, higher in southern Front Range and on south-facing slopes (e.g., Upper limit of Lower Montane ~7,500’ in Larimer vs. ~8,500’ in El Paso)

2May include: Ponderosa Pine, Douglas-fir (up to ~8,000’), Aspen, Blue Spruce, Limber Pine, Engelmann Spruce, Sub-alpine Fir

Note:Riparian zones are included and considered in each life zone in which they are found

Front range roundtable q2 13 meeting

The Lower Montane is the Roundtable’s highest priority ecosystem for landscape-scale ecological restoration.

Risk of ignition / fire spread

HRV2 well understood?

Difference from HRV2?


General elevations1

Front Range ecosystems




  • Alpine

~9,000-9,500’ to ~11,500’

  • Sub-alpine

~8,000’ to ~9,000-9,500’

  • Upper Montane

~6,000’ to ~8,000’

  • Lower Montane

~5,500’ to ~6,000’

  • Lower Ecotone

1 Elevations noted are rough estimates – actual elevation limits depend on latitude, aspect, and other local factors

2Historical Range of Variability in terms of vegetation characteristics; fuel composition; fire frequency, severity and pattern; and other associated disturbances

Historical photos show how forest treatments in the lower montane restore forest structures

Historical photos show how forest treatments in the Lower Montane restore forest structures

Front range lives and resources remain at risk

Front Range Lives and Resources Remain at Risk

Natural and economic resources


Water and safety

  • 4.2 million acres of forests6 (53% of all land types7) including 2 million acres of habitat for 31 species of concern5

  • 80% of Front Range forests have recreation opportunities5 attracting some of Colorado’s 28 million overnight visitors spending $10 billion annually, making tourism the second- highest employment sector in the state, with 143,000 jobs3

  • $5 million per year of available biomass from forest treatments12

  • 881 communities1

  • 2 million people(more than 40% of Colorado’s population)2

  • More than 700,000 homes3

  • 1,246 essential water supply infrastructures (intakes4, reservoirs, transbasin diversions)

  • 4.2 million acres of forest watersheds important for drinking water (65% at risk for post-fire erosion)5

  • 1,775 miles of roads8

  • 1,573 miles of transmission lines

  • 664 miles of gas pipeline9

  • 122 communications towers10

  • Federal Register (as of January 4, 2001)

  • 2005 Census (ESRI)

  • SERGoM (Spatially Explicit Regional Growth Model) version `12 June 2008 (Theobald) 100m

CDPHE, 2009

Colorado State Forest Service and The Nature Conservancy. 2009. Colorado Statewide Forest Assessment (in preparation).

LANDFIRE, 2006 (Includes PJ and shrubs)

  • ESRI, 2007

  • TIGER: USCB. 2006

  • Ventyx, December 2009

  • FAA, 2009

  • “State spending on tourism a hot potato for lawmakers,” Rocky Mountain News, January 12, 2009.

  • 166,000 bdt/y (Jefferson County Biomass Facility Feasibility Study, McNeil Technologies Inc , January 2005 ) * $30

The front range roundtable

The Front Range Roundtable

The Front Range Roundtable was formed to “serve as a focal point for diverse stakeholder input into efforts to reduce wildland fire risks and improve forest health through sustained fuels treatment along the Colorado Front Range.”


Ecological Restoration Goals

Fire Risk Mitigation Goals

The Front Range roundtable has reached consensus that 1.5 million acres of Front Range forests require treatments to reduce fire risk and/or achieve ecological restoration.


~400,000 acres

~400,000 acres

~700,000 acres

Overlap of goals

2009 map of priorities accomplishments vs 2006 recommendations

2009 Map of Priorities: Accomplishments vs. 2006 Recommendations

Notes on methods

Data collected back to 2004 to our best available knowledge (received for treated acres separately from planned acres as shown)

Excludes private land treated without the assistance of the CSFS

Excludes county lands treated in Park, Teller, Douglas, El Paso, and Grand.

Some of these areas have been treated with prescribed or natural burn and may not require additional near-term treatment. Some of these areas have been treated mechanically but still require prescribed or natural burn to achieve restoration.

Different databases are used between units/agencies. Data is comparable within a unit, but not between units. This should be resolved for 2009 and future years.

Source: Map by USFS-ARP

Treatment accomplishments by county as of 2008 vs 2006 roundtable recommendations

Treatment Accomplishments by County as of 2008 vs. 2006 Roundtable Recommendations

Data underlying the monitoring map on the prior slide:

Progress towards the roundtable vision

Progress Towards the Roundtable Vision

Direct Roundtable Successes

Launched the self-sustaining Woodland Park Healthy Forest Initiative (WPHFI) with seed funds of $75,000 provided by Roundtable members and partners, which the WPHFI leveraged into an additional $175,000 in other funding

Helped submit a winning proposal to the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) for an additional $1 million for Front Range National Forests in FY10, $3.4 million in FY11 and $3.1 million in FY12 (with the possibility of further allocations).

Partners’ successes consistent with recommendations

Long term stewardships contracts: Arapaho-Roosevelt and Pike-San Isabel (3,000 acres/yr for 10 years)

Increased federal funding for on the ground treatments: $1.8 mm more in 2008 than in 2006; $1 million in 2009 ARRA funds

Biomass utilization: bioheating in Gilpin, Boulder, and Park counties; planned in El Paso; 22 slash sites for private landowners across Front Range

CWPPs: 75 Front Range CWPPs approved (out of 151 completed in Colorado)

Policies: Passage of state legislation authorizing the creation of local Forest Improvement Districts

Scorecard of roundtable s vision

Scorecard of Roundtable’s Vision

  • Significant progress made


  • Some progress made


  • Initial progress made



  • Needs attention

  • Roundtable Goals (2006)

  • 2009

  • 2010

  • 2011

  • 2012

  • Recommended initiatives

Increase funding for forest treatments

  • Identify new state and local funding sources for treatments on state and private land.

  • Increase forest treatment incentives for private landowners.

  • Advocate for additional federal funding for Front Range forest treatments.

  • Increase appropriate application of prescribed fire and wildland fire use as a management tool.

  • Increase utilization of woody biomass for facility heating.

  • Increase contract sizes and durations with stewardship contracts on federal land.

  • Change local policy to limit the growth of fire risk in the Wildland-Urban Interface.

  • Promote the development of Community Wildfire Protection Plans for Front Range communities-at-risk.

  • Adopt a clear and common framework for prioritizing treatments.

  • Convene follow-on Roundtable to ensure implementation of recommended initiatives.

















Reduce the cost of forest treatments









Ensure local leadership and planning













Set clear priorities and ensure progress against common goals





  • Source: Most initiatives were rated by a poll at the September 18, 2009 Quarterly Roundtable meeting of 37 attendees from 24 organizations representing 11 stakeholder groups. Ratings for initiatives 3, 5, and 6 were increased by one level at the December 2, 2010 Executive Team meeting. Ratings for initiatives 3, 5, and 6 were raised on level at the March 4, 2011 Roundtable meeting; 2012 assessment made at Q4-12 meeting Nov. 30, 2012.

Roundtable organization



Mixed teams

Roundtable Organization

Executive Team

Front Range Fuels Treatment Partnership (FRFTP)2


Colorado Watershed Wildfire Protection Working Group (CWWPWG)2

Coalition for the Upper South Platte (CUSP)—Fiscal Agent)1

Northern Front Range Mountain Pine Beetle Working Group (NFRMPBWG)2




Community Protection (CP) Team

Biomass Utilization and Slash Sites (BUSS) Team

Landscape Restoration (LR) Team

Wildlife Team

Colorado Forest Restoration Institute (CFRI) 3

The Front Range Roundtable is not itself a legal entity but an informal volunteer coalition with CUSP acting as fiscal agent.

Partner groups are separate from the Front Range Roundtable and have their own organizational structures and initiatives.

Project leader and fiscal agent for the CFLRP Monitoring Teams

Executive team structure and change process

Executive Team Structure and Change Process

Dedicated to certain organizations1

Dedicated to certain stakeholder groups2

Open to other stakeholder groups3

Size: At least 6 or no more than 9 members4

Current Executive Team Membership

USFS-AR Supervisor

Glenn Casamassa

USFS-PSI Supervisor

Jerri Marr

CSFS State Forester (Acting)

Joe Duda

Conserva-tion NGO

Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy

County Commis-sioner

Cindy Domenico, Boulder County

County Commis-sioner

Sallie Clark

El Paso County


Carol Ekarius, Coalition for the Upper South Platte

Landscape Restoration Team Liaison

Pam Motley, West Range Reclamation

Community Protection Team Liaison

Megan Davis, Boulder County

Process for changing membership:

Term ends (or renews) Dec. 2013

Only when there is a change in the leadership of the organization shown

Terms end (or renew) May 2013

Terms end (or renew) at end of June 2013

  • Three seats are dedicated permanently to these leadership positions from these organizations shown

  • Two seats are dedicated to these stakeholder groups shown with the representing organization rotating each year, as desired

  • One seat is dedicated for the fiscal agent of the Roundtable, one seat is for each of the two main working teams: the Community Protection Team and the Landscape Restoration Team. One or two seats are open to additional or other stakeholder groups with the stakeholder type and/or representing organization rotating each year as desired among: Conservation, County Commissioner, Energy, Insurance, Local Government, Planning, Private, Recreation, Science / Academic, State Government, Timber, or Water

  • Membership size can very depending on the decisions of the Executive team and Roundtable needs / number of applicants

Front range roundtable roles

Front Range Roundtable Roles

Propose strategic, organizational, and operational priorities for the Roundtable’s consideration at Quarterly meetings

In between Quarterly meetings, make decisions on behalf of the Roundtable as needed

Approve agendas for Roundtable Quarterly meetings (proposed by Facilitator)

Meet once each quarter between Quarterly Roundtable meetings

Executive Team

Schedule, arrange, and facilitate Roundtable Quarterly meetings, Executive Team meetings, and working team meetings

Support working teams in achieving their goals by providing organizational, administrative, and logistical support (e.g., keeping work plans) —not content or legwork

Act as the central point of contact for all Roundtable internal and external communications (e.g., email distribution list, website maintenance)


Execute on the Roundtable’s strategic goals, according to work plans developed jointly by the teams

Present progress updates at Quarterly Roundtable meetings

Attend working team meetings as scheduled, typically two calls per month with some in person meetings as determined by the team

Working Teams

Attend quarterly Roundtable meetings and, when required, approve or change proposals by the Executive Team

Share relevant announcements and updates to Quarterly Roundtable meetings; productively contribute to discussions, honoring the obligation to dissent when necessary

Volunteer for working teams if able and/or want to see something done by the Roundtable


Front range roundtable participants through the years

Front Range Roundtable Participants Through the Years

Last updated Mar. 2013: Since 2006, 438 people from 150 organizations have participated in the Roundtable (210 active subscribers to email list; to join, see  “Join Us”)

Front range roundtable 2013 2015 goals

Front Range Roundtable 2013-2015 Goals

Annually fundraise at least $50,000

Plan and execute quarterly Roundtable meetings and agendas

Respond to letter of support requests as needed

Executive Team

Community Protection (CP) Team [draft goals]

The community protection team will serve as a communication, networking, and information exchange among professionals working on community wildfire protection, wildfire mitigation, and private landowner education.

Increase stakeholder involvement in the Community Protection Team and devote one of the four larger Roundtable meetings each year to community protection issues.

Biomass Utilization and Slash Sites (BUSS) Team

6. Share information on a monthly basis and by email about biomass utilization developments across the Front Range (via monthly calls)

Serve as the Front Range CFLR project multi-party monitoring group

Develop an adaptive management process and recommendations

Revise the June 2011 CFLR monitoring plan (through addendums until funding identified for a re-write)

Landscape Restoration (LR) Team

10. By Spring 2014, recommend a wildlife monitoring plan for the CFLRP by prioritizing an abridged list of species to monitor, hypothesizing expected post-treatment population trends for each target species, and proposing data collection and monitoring methods for each target species, with budgets

Wildlife Team

11. Goal still to be defined (starting with review of USFS long terms treatment plans at May 31 meeting; then possibly refine priority acres, based on feasibility [slope, access], other consideration of other forest types, such as mixed conifer)

40 Year Treatment Plan

Prescribed Fire Initiative

12. Goal still to be defined (starting with checking in with prescribed fire council)

13. Goal still to be defined (Community Protection team will brainstorm ideas)

Policy Initiative

14. Work with a community to develop a project plan and attract funding for a turn-key project in

a priority landscapes

15. Update the Front Range 10-County map of completed treatments

Implementation initiatives

= Top priority

= If capacity allows

Fundraising update

Fundraising Update

Budget update expenses page 1 of 2

Budget Update—Expenses (Page 1 of 2)

  • The NFF grant ended in January for the LR team: $10k from March 2012 to January 2013

  • CSU has been funding the LR team and the Wildlife team since February:

  • CUSP is the fiscal agent for all other Roundtable activities and associated monies (see next page)

Budget update expenses page 2 of 2

Budget Update—Expenses (Page 2 of 2)

  • CUSP is the fiscal agent for all other Roundtable activities and associated monies

$24k from July 2012 to April 2013

Next steps from march 8 roundtable meeting

Next Steps from March 8 Roundtable Meeting

  • John Ring: Help on the teacher training / outreach initiative led by Shawna Crocker

  • Carol Ekarius: Work with Mike McHugh to plan two summer field trips for elected officials to Waldo and High Park fire sites (Shawna Crocker offered to coordinate using CSU's vans which can seat 12 passengers each); 5/9 update: just for elected officials, not as part of the RT mtg

  • Peter Brown: Look into planning a science / education symposium, perhaps in partnership with the Colorado Forest Collaboratives group led by Lisa Dale, perhaps in partnership with the CFLR Coalition or the NFF's CFLR webinars. Activities may include: writing a letter to CFRI and others to coordinate a science synthesis; 5/9 update:

  • Rob Addington: Work with Mike Babler to speak with the state Prescribed Fire Council to get ideas about the Roundtable can participate in promoting the increased use of prescribed fire

  • Hal Gibbs:

    • Work with Mark Martin & Craig Jones on thinking through the future of the BUSS team (biomass utilization and slash site); ask Mike Smith how the Roundtable can best stay up to date on biomass utilization opportunities, challenges, progress and needs

    • Work with data providers and a GIS expert on updating the 2009 Roundtable map of where forest treatments have taken place, in relation to where the Roundtable recommended that forests be treated for forest restoration and/or fire risk mitigation

  • Login