The benefit of EIGEN gravity field models
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 25

The benefit of EIGEN gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 93 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The benefit of EIGEN gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa Frank Flechtner , Roland Schmidt, Ulrich Meyer, Tilo Schöne, Sakia Esselborn, Christoph Förste, Richard Stubenvoll, Sergei Rudenko, Rolf König, Hans Neumayer, Markus Rothacher GFZ Potsdam. Motivation.

Download Presentation

The benefit of EIGEN gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

The benefit of EIGEN gravity field models

for altimetry and vice versa

Frank Flechtner, Roland Schmidt, Ulrich Meyer, Tilo Schöne,

Sakia Esselborn, Christoph Förste, Richard Stubenvoll,

Sergei Rudenko,Rolf König, Hans Neumayer, Markus Rothacher

GFZ Potsdam


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Motivation

  • The impact of modern global gravity field models derived from CHAMP

  • and GRACEon satellite altimetry is threefold:

  • Precise gravity fields are necessary prerequisite for the POD of

  • altimeter satellites at or below the noise level of the altimeter

  • instruments.

  • 2. Satellite-only geoid solutions with unprecedented spatial resolution

  • are essential for the determination of the sea surface topography

  • from altimeter data and precise altimeter satellite orbits.

  • 3.Time series of highly-accurate global gravity field models together

  • with altimetry are expected to give insight into separation of mass

  • and steric components of the ocean surface. See Talk S. Esselborn

  • “Basin Scale Mass Variations in the Atl. Ocean”

  • Finally, gravity information derived from altimetry is still an invaluable

  • input for the generation of high-resolution satellite, terrestrial and

  • altimeter data combination gravity models.


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Content

  • Status of EIGEN (European Improved Gravity model of the Earth by

  • New techniques) gravity field model determination (collaboration

  • between GFZ and GRGS)

  • Influence of old and modern gravity fields on ERS-1/2 POD

  • Improvements in sea surface topography and sea surface currents

  • due to GRACE gravity models

  • Summary/Conclusions


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Typical Ground-Based Coverage

(before GPS Space Receiver became available)

  • Doppler, SLR, Doris, PRARE, …

  • One dimension at a time

  • Large coverage gaps

  • Very critical for LEOs


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

New Observation Techniques

Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking

high - low

low - low

Satellite Gravity Gradiometry

Williamstown 1969, NASA

Elmau 1979, ESA

Erice 1985, IAG

Coolfont 1991, NASA


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

The Dawn of a New Age

CHAMP (since 2000)

GRACE (since 2002)

Germany

USA-Germany

GOCE (2007)

European


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN Satellite-only Modeling (1)

Mean Satellite-only Gravity Fields: Gain in Resolution

  • Minimal resolvable

    wavelength dropped

    from 200-300 km

    to ~150 km.

  • Accumulated geoid

    error decreased to

    1/3 than before, i.e.

    ~ 50 cm at this

    wavelength.


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN Satellite-only Modeling (2)

Mean CHAMP & GRACE Gravity Field: Gain in Accuracy

1cm @ 2800 km

1cm @ 700 km

1cm @ 270 km

1mm @ 600 km


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN Combination Modeling (1)

Combination of Satellite and Surface Gravity Data

1:ArcGP gravity anomalies (Forsberg, Kenyon 2004)

2: NRCan gravity anomalies (Véronneau 2003, personal communication)

3: AWI (Studinger, 1988) and LDO (Bell et al., 1999) gravity anomalies

4: NIMA altimetric gravity anomalies over the ocean

5: Geoid undulations over the oceans derived from GFZ MSSH minus ECCO Sea Surf. Top. (Stammer et al., 2002)

6: NIMA terrestrial gravity anomalies (if not covered by data sets 1 to 3)

7: NIMA ship-borne gravity anomalies over water depths less than 2000 m (white lines)

White areas filled with EIGEN-3 data


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN Combination Modeling (2)

EIGEN-CG03C Gravity Anomalies


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN-Modeling

Gravity anomalies over Europe from different models

GRIM-5S1

EIGEN-CHAMP03S

EIGEN-GRACE03S

EIGEN-CG03C


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN-GL04C (1)

The latest EIGEN Models

  • EIGEN-GRACE04S: Reprocessing of ~3y of GRACE data at GFZ using

  • improved ambiguity fixing method for determination of phase ambiguities

  • between GPS sender satellites and ground receivers

  • arc lengths of the adjusted orbits has been shortened from 1.5d to 1d

  • oceanic short-term mass variations corrected with baroclinic model

  • EIGEN-GL04C: Combination of

  • EIGEN-GRACE04S (GFZ, ~3y)

  • GRACE normal equations (GRGS (3y)

  • Lageos normal equations (GRGS, 3y)

  • Surface gravity data (~EIGEN-CG03C)


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN-GL04C (2)

contribution to the solution, full normal matrix:

contribution to the solution, block diagonal matrix:

contribution to the solution, numerical integration:

kept separately (reduced from the full normal matrix):

kept separately (stabilized and reduced from the full normal matrix):

LAGEOS

terr N

150

30

overlapping

GRACE

terr F

terr B

70

120

degree/order

179

359

360


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN-GL04C (3)

Kaula‘s rule

EIGEN-GL04C

error cumulative

EIGEN-GL04C signal

1 cm @ 220 km

10 cm @ 125 km

EIGEN-GL04C error

EIGEN-GL04C vs. GGM02C

EIGEN-CG03C vs. GGM02C

EIGEN-CG01C vs. GGM02C


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

EIGEN-GL04C (4)

Unrealistic Meridional Striping

much reduced in GL04C !

EIGEN-CG03C & EIGEN-GL04C

minus terrestrial gravity data

based geoid (m)

EIGEN-CG03C

EIGEN-GL04C


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Altimeter satellite POD (1)

  • Goal: Test modern (GRACE) and some old geopotential models for

  • the determination of precise orbits of ERS-1 and ERS-2 altimetry

  • satellites.

  • ERS-1 data: SLR & SXO (24.03.1995 - 29.09.1995: 38 7d arcs)

  • ERS-2 data: SLR & PRARE (03.03.1997 - 02.09.1997: 36 7d arcs)

  • Validation: RMS orbital fit, Arc overlaps (2d)

  • NOTE: Detailed results on “Precise orbits of altimetry satellites ERS-1, ERS-2 and TOPEX/Poseidon” based on new EIGEN geopotential models covering the period 1991-2005 are shown on a poster by Rudenko et al. (Tuesday)


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Altimeter satellite POD (2)

Gravity Fields used in POD Test


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Altimeter satellite POD (3)

ERS-1 orbital fits and arc overlaps (cm)

SLR & SXO global RMS and radial overlap improved by approx. 1-1.5 mm,

when compared to GRIM results


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Altimeter satellite POD (4)

ERS-2 orbital fits and arc overlaps (cm)

SLR global RMS and radial overlap components improved by ~0.5-1 mm and

0.4 mm, respectively when compared to GRIM results


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Improvements in Altimetry (1)

  • Dynamic Topography at the ocean surface can be derived from a

  • highly precise geoid model and a mean sea surface height (MSSH)

  • model derived from altimetry.

  • The geoid model is the satellite-only model EIGEN-GRACE03S

  • (nmax=150) which does not contain a-priori information from altimetry.

  • The GFZ-MSSH model is calculated from updated and harmonized

  • Topex and ERS1/2 data on a 2’x2’ grid using state of the art instrument

  • data and geophysical models including orbits based on EIGEN-

  • GRACE03S geoid model and a special SSB correction for Topex at the

  • end of the side A period.

  • The altimeter and geoid data have to be spatially filtered to take into

  • account the different spatial resolutions. Hamming, Hanning and

  • Gaussian tested to derive geostrophic surface currents.


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Improvements in Altimetry (2)

MSSH and GRACE Geoid

GFZ-MSSH

EIGEN-GRACE03S geoid

Hanning filter with 400km half length width applied


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Improvements in Altimetry (3)

Dynamic Ocean Topography

GFZ-MSSH – EIGEN-GRACE03S

WOCE climatology


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Improvements in Altimetry (4)

Geostrophic Circulation

EGM96S

GRACE

All major current systems

tracked, e.g.

Gulf Stream,

Kuroshio

Circumpolar Current


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Improvements in Altimetry (5)

Zoom: North Atlantic Geostrophic Surface Circulation

GFZ-MSSH –

EIGEN_GRACE03S

Hydrobase climatology from

Woods Hole Oceanographic

Institute (1700 m)

WOCE climatology (1750 m)

  • Very good agreement in strength and position of main current systems

  • See also Poster Esselborn et al. (“A Mean Ocean Dynamic Topography

  • Derived from Reprocessed Altimetry and the Latest GRACE Geoid Model”)


The benefit of eigen gravity field models for altimetry and vice versa

Summary/Conclusions

Celebrate the 4th Birthday of GRACE on Friday!

  • GFZ has generated EIGEN gravity fields (as part of the GRACE SDS)

  • based on GRACE-only and GRACE plus terrestrial/altimetry gravity

  • combination fields (with GRGS).

  • Latest is EIGEN-GL04C which shows substantial improvement (OSTST).

  • Altimetry definitely benefits from these new models (POD, Dynamic

  • Topography, Surface Currents).

  • For more details see Posters Rudenko et al. and Esselborn et al.!

  • Remaining POD radial and XO differences will be hard to improve.

  • Further plans are to process longer GRACE time series and to include

  • more GRACE data and additional CHAMP data to EIGEN-GL04C

  • ERS-2 orbit: Reprocessing of PRARE data???


  • Login