Lecture 25 bose einstein condensation ch 7
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 19

Lecture 25. Bose-Einstein Condensation (Ch. 7 ) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 109 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Nobel 2001. Lecture 25. Bose-Einstein Condensation (Ch. 7 ). BEC and related phenomena. BEC of photons (lasers). Townes. Basov. Prokhorov. Nobel 1964. BEC in a weakly- interacting system (atomic gases). BEC in a strongly- interacting system (superfluid 4 He).

Download Presentation

Lecture 25. Bose-Einstein Condensation (Ch. 7 )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Lecture 25 bose einstein condensation ch 7

Nobel 2001

Lecture 25. Bose-Einstein Condensation (Ch. 7 )

BEC and

related phenomena

BEC of photons

(lasers)

Townes

Basov

Prokhorov

Nobel 1964

BEC in a weakly-

interacting system

(atomic gases)

BEC in a strongly-

interacting system

(superfluid 4He)

Einstein described the phenomenon of condensation in an ideal gas of particles with nonzero mass in 1925. In the 1930’s Fritz London realized that superfluity 4He can be understood on terms of BEC. However, the analysis of superfluity 4He is complicated by the fact that the 4He atoms in liquid strongly interact with each other.

Landau

Nobel 1962

Kapitsa

Nobel 1978

70 years after the Einstein prediction, the BEC in weakly interacting Bose systems has been experimentally demonstrated - by laser cooling of a system of weakly-interacting alkali atoms in a magnetic trap.


Ideal gas of conserved bosons

T

Ideal Gas of Conserved Bosons

  • Two types of bosons:

  • Composite particles which contain an even number of fermions. These number of these particles is conserved if the energy does not exceed the dissociation energy (~ MeV in the case of the nucleus).

  • (b) Particles associated with a field, of which the most important example is the photon. These particles are not conserved: if the total energy of the field changes, particles appear and disappear. The chemical potential of such particles is zero in equilibrium, regardless of density.

The occupancy cannot be negative for any , thus, for bosons,   0 ( varies from 0 to ). Also, as T0,   0

Critical density for bosons:

Since   0, the maximum possible value ofn is obtained when  = 0,

where nQ is the quantum concentration, which varies as T 3/2


Approaching the critical density

 (n,T)

T

TC

Approaching the Critical Density...

What happens if we reduce the temperature at a given density n until ncr drops below n?

n

T

(apart from a numerical factor of order unity, TCis equal to the Fermi temperature of a Fermi gas with density n)

As  becomes larger (T smaller), ll must decrease ( - increase)to maintain fixed density. However, since  cannot be positive for a BE system, at some T=TC the decrease of ll cannot compensate the rapid decrease of the T-dependent pre-factor.

Paradox: we wanted to maintain n= N/V fixed, and now we see that we are not allowed to do this at sufficiently low temperatures. Of course there is no physical reason why we cannot continue lowering the temperature at fixed density (or increasing the density at fixed temperature).


Particles in the ground state are missing

Particles in the Ground State are Missing...

Resolving the paradox: The problem is caused by the behavior of the 3D density of states and our use of the continuum approximation. Because g()=0 at =0, our calculations of n ignored all the particles in the ground (=0) state. At low energies, we have to take into account the discreteness of the quantum states.

n()

g()

=

g()n()

For a Fermi system, this neglect would be of no consequence – there are only 2 fermions at zero energy. For a Bose system, the number of particles in the ground state at sufficiently low T becomes huge:

Because 0 at a non-zero T, the ground state can accommodate any number of particles! It was a bad idea to ignore the ground level.

The ground state of an ideal Bose gas:

In this lowest state, all the wavefunctions look like that:

(we’ve chosen the energy of this state as our zero energy).


Bose einstein condensation

 (n,T)

T

TC

T < TC

g()n()

We can discuss the ideal Bose gas in the same terms of a phase transition. That is, at a critical value of temperature, TC, (n,T) reaches the limit of  = 0 and stops increasing. Beyond this point, the relation

Bose-Einstein Condensation

is no longer able to keep track of all the particles – we miss the particles in the ground state. Below TC, bosons begin to condense into the ground state. The abrupt accumulation of bosons in the ground state is called Bose-Einstein condensation.

The eq. n(T) with  = 0 still works at T<TC for calculating the number of particles not in the ground state:

The density of particles in the ground state:

n>0

n

n0

a tremendous number of particles all sitting in the very lowest available energy state

TC

T


Be condensation vs gas to liquid condensation

BE Condensation vs. Gas-to-Liquid Condensation

Classical physics analogy: let’s fill a container with a non-ideal gas and start lowering the temperature. The gas density remains constant until the condensation of gas (vapor) occurs. Since the density of liquid is much higher than that of gas, the gas density decreases with T.

Despite this similarity, the Bose-Einstein condensation is an entirely different phenomenon.

One essential difference is that in the gas-to-liquid transition, which is due to interparticle attraction, the liquid and gas phases occupy different regions of space. The BE condensation is driven by exchange interactions. Each particle in the BE condensate has a wave function that fills the entire volume of the container.

The BE condensation is the condensation in the momentum space.

The phase separation occurs in the k-space, not in the coordinate space. The condensed bosons have essentially zero momentum (i.e., their wave vector k is as small as the size of the container permits).

A common misconception about BE condensation is that it requires “brute force” cooling, when kBT becomes much smaller than the differences of energies of the quantum states of the system - that would be a trivial effect, though the temperatures would have been inaccessibly low for any macroscopic system. The point is that condensation can happen at much higher temperatures, when kBTis still large compared to the inter-level .


Some numbers

Some Numbers...

Interestingly, the expression for the critical temperature that we got works even for liquid helium, despite the fact that this is a strongly-interacting liquid, not a dilute gas. For 4He:

- only ~40% higher than the actual superfluid transition temperature (2.17 K).

To ensure weakness of interactions, the experimenters should work with dilute atomic gases. In this case, the critical temperature is much lower. One of the record-high values of TC – for atomic hydrogen (BEC was achieved in 1998 at MIT). The density was 1.8·1020 atoms/m3: which, according to our equation for TC, corresponds to TC = 51 K, in a nice agreement with the exp. value TC = 50 K.

The calculated TC = 51 K is in a nice agreement with the exp. value TC = 50 K.

At this density, the distance between the atoms is ~ 104 times greater than the Bohr radius, and the interatomic interactions are extremely weak. The condensation is driven by statistics rather than by interactions!


Realization of bec in a dilute 87 rb vapor

Realization of BEC in a Dilute 87Rb Vapor

In principle, the lighter the bosons, the greater TC. For example, the BE condensation of excitons (light-induced electron-hole pairs) in semiconductors has been observed before the BE condensation in dilute gases (electron is a fermion, but an electron-hole pair has an integer spin).

First observation of the BEC with weakly-interacting gases was observed with relatively heavy atoms of 87Rb. 10,000 rubidium-87 atoms were confined within a “box” with dimensions ~ 10 m (the density ~ 1019 m-3). The spacing between the energy levels:

The transition was observed at ~ 0.1 K. This is in line with the estimate:

!

- again, it is worth emphasizing that the BEC occurs at kBT >>  :

- the greater the total number of particles in the system, the greater this difference.


Realization of bec in dilute vapor cont

Realization of BEC in Dilute Vapor (cont.)

The atoms are not very close to each other in the classic sense - in fact, the average density of this condensate is very low—one billionth the density of normal solids or liquids. But at this temperature, the quantum volume becomes comparable to the average volume per atom:

At T=0.9TC, the number of atoms in the ground state:

degeneracy of the 1st excited state in a cube

For comparison, in the first excited state:

The ratio N0/N1, which is ~ 5 for N = 104, rapidly increases with N at a fixed T/TC (it becomes ~ 25 for N = 106).

n>0

n

n0

TC

T


Problem

Problem

  • Calculate the critical temperature for BE condensation of diatomic hydrogen H2 if the density of liquid hydrogen is 60 kg/m3. Would you expect superfluidity in liquid hydrogen as well? Hydrogen liquefies around 20K and solidifies at 14K.

  • Above TC, the pressure in a degenerate Bose gas is proportional to T. Do you expect the temperature dependence of pressure to be stronger or weaker at T <TC ? Explain and draw a qualitative graph of the temperature dependence of pressure over the temperature range 0 <T < 2 TC.

(a) Liquid hydrogen:

Since hydrogen solidifies at 14K, we do not expect to observe superfluidity in liquid hydrogen.

(b) The atoms in the ground state do not contribute to pressure. At T < TC, two factors contribute to the fast increase of P with temperature: (i) an increase of the number of atoms in the excited states, and (b) an increase of the average speed of atoms with temperature. As the result, the rate of the pressure increase with temperature is greater at T < TCthan that atT > TC (in fact , P~T5/2at T < TC) .

P(T)

TC

T


Laser cooling

Laser

How to cool the gas of Rb atoms down to ~0.1 K? The first stage – laser cooling, the second stage – evaporative cooling.

Laser Cooling

E2

For photon absorption or emission, the photon energy h must be equal to E2-E1

  • works for a dilute gas of neutral atoms

  • (cannot be applied to cool solids)

E1

If the laser frequency is tuned slightly below E2-E1, an atom scatters (absorbs and re-emits) photons only is it moves towards the laser (Doppler effect).Atom at rest or moving in the opposite direction doesn’t scatter.

If a resonant photon is absorbed, the atom acquires momentum:

The corresponding energy:

Na, A=23

An apparent limit on T achieved by laser cooling is reached when an atom’s recoil energy from absorbing or emitting a single photon is comparable to its total K. The single-photon recoil temperature limit (for Na):


Laser cooling and trapping

Laser Cooling and Trapping

By laser cooling, T~ 10 K can be reached. At this temperature, the atom’s speed is a few cm/s. These slow-moving atoms are relatively easy to confine in a non-uniform magnetic trap. The magnetic field has a minimum value in the center of the “magnetic bowl”. An atom with spin parallel to the magnetic field (i.e., atomic magnetic moment anti-parallel to the magnetic field), is attracted to the minimum; for spin anti-parallel to the field, the atom is repelled from the minimum.

Laser cooling has been used in the experiments on BEC observation for pre-cooling of the gas of alkali atoms. However, to observe this phenomenon, even lower T are necessary. Further reduction of T by ~3 orders of magnitude (below 0.1 K) is required for the exp. vapor densities ~ 1017 m-3. This is achieved by the evaporation cooling after the lasers are turned off.

Magneto-Optical Trap


Evaporative cooling

Evaporative Cooling

Radio-frequency forced evaporative cooling.

The resonance excitation flips the spins and those atoms are ejected (evaporated). Reducing fr frequency evaporates lower energy atoms.


Metastability is the key

Metastability is the Key

The experiments with Rb vapor were aimed at realization of BEC in a weakly-interacting system.

Though the interactions are weak in the vapor of Rb atoms, they are sufficiently strong for the phase transition vapor-solid at ultra-low temperatures. In conditions of thermal equilibrium, one cannot get below the blue line without phase separation.

vapor-solid/liquid

phase boundary

vapor

cond. matter

liquid

He

BEC

~ 1010

How to cheat the Nature? The key is metastability. If the process of cooling is slow and “gentle” enough, one can realize a “super-saturated” vapor below the coexistence line without a condensed phase ever forming. For this, not only the interaction with walls must be excluded, but also the three-particle collisions that assist forming molecules and, eventually, condensed-matter phase – hence, very low densities.


Observation of bec

Observation of BEC

To observe the distribution of velocities of atoms in the system, the magnetic trap is turned off. The atoms find themselves in free space, and, because they have some residual velocity, they just fly apart.

After they have flown apart for some time, the cloud is much bigger, and it is easier to take a snapshot of the atomic cloud (to make a snapshot, a laser beam is scattered by the cloud).

The picture shows the velocity distribution of atoms in the cloud at the time of its release, instead of the spatial distribution.

For T > TC, atoms are distributed among many energy levels of the system, and have a Gaussian distribution of velocities. With cooling of the cloud, a spike appears right in its middle. It corresponds to atoms which are hardly moving at all: for T < TC, the concentration of atoms in the lowest state gives rise to a pronounced peak in the distribution at low velocities (condensation in the momentum space).

Each frame corresponds to the distance the atoms have moved in about 1/20 s after turning off the trap.

This two-component cloud resembles the situation in superfluid helium, where two components coexist: normal and superfluid .


Heat capacity of a bose gas

Heat Capacity of a Bose Gas

The particles condensed in the ground state do not contribute to the total energy of a Bose gas:

At T < TC = 0

This shape of CV(T) is the result of our neglect of inter-particle interactions. However, in the systems with interactions, similar effect is observed (e.g., near the superfluid transition in liquid 4He) - the so-called  transition.

CV /NkB

2

1.5

0

1

T/TC


Thermodynamic functions of a degenerate bose gas

Thermodynamic Functions of a Degenerate Bose Gas

By integrating the heat capacity at constant volume, we can get the entropy:

The Helmholtz free energy ( = 0):

The pressure exerted by a degenerate Bose gas:

does not depend on volume!

This is due to the fact that, when compressing a degenerate Bose gas, we just force more particles to occupy the ground state. The particles in the ground state do not contribute to pressure – except of the zero-motion oscillations, they are at rest.


Atomic laser

Atomic Laser

The atoms in the BE condensate all have the same energy, they are in a coherent state. If one turns off the trap, the atoms would all fall down in an ideally monochromatic beam. Such a beam can be used for studies analogous to those of photon correlations in quantum optics.

The trap is analogous to the optical cavity formed by the mirrors in a conventional laser. But to make a laser we need to extract the coherent field from the optical cavity in a controlled way. This can be achieved by transferring the atoms from states that are confined to ones that are not, typically by flipping the direction of their spin by resonant absorption of RF radiation. (Only the atoms that had their magnetic moments pointing in the opposite direction to the magnetic field are trapped in the magnetic trap). The MIT researchers applied short RF pulses to "flip" the spins of some of the atoms and therefore release them from the trap The extracted atoms then accelerated away from the trap under the force of gravity.


Future directions

Future Directions

Optical Lattices

BEC on a Chip

Vortices in the BE Condensate

These experiments are not just a repetition of the superfluid liquid helium experiments, because the system is very different. Also, there are new experimental tools developed by atomic physics; e.g, it is possible to see individual atoms; the atomic velocity distributions can be resolved, which has not really been possible to do in liquid helium.


  • Login