Heavy to light ratios as a test of medium induced energy loss at rhic and the lhc
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Heavy-to-light ratios as a test of medium-induced energy loss at RHIC and the LHC PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 48 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

N. Armesto. Heavy-to-light ratios as a test of medium-induced energy loss at RHIC and the LHC. Quark Matter 2005: 18th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Budapest, August 4th-9th 2005. N éstor Armesto Departamento de Física de Partículas and

Download Presentation

Heavy-to-light ratios as a test of medium-induced energy loss at RHIC and the LHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Heavy to light ratios as a test of medium induced energy loss at rhic and the lhc

N. Armesto

Heavy-to-light ratios as a testof medium-induced energy loss at RHIC and the LHC

Quark Matter 2005:

18th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions

Budapest, August 4th-9th 2005

Néstor Armesto

Departamento de Física de Partículas

and

Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

1


Contents

N. Armesto

Contents

1. Motivation.

2. Model.

3. Results for RHIC.

4. Results for the LHC.

5. Bottom at RHIC.

6. Conclusions.

With Andrea Dainese (Padova),

Carlos A. Salgado and Urs A. Wiedemann (CERN),

Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 054027 (hep-ph/0501225).

Work in progress with the former

plus Matteo Cacciari (Paris VI).

2

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


1 motivation

N. Armesto

Genuine prediction of this approach:

DE (g) > DE (q) > DE(Q)

mass effect

colour charge

1. Motivation:

BDMPS/GLV/GWZ/ZW: interference of production and scatterings

of the radiated gluon

Characterization

of the medium:

3

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


2 model i

N. Armesto

RHIC, no medium effects

Quenching weights

(www.pd.infn.it/~dainesea/qwmassive.html):

probability for medium energy loss.

  • CTEQ4L pdf's, EKS98.

  • gg (qqbar) to QQbar, Q(bar)g to Q(bar)g.

  • g to QQbar (important for the LHC).

  • Ff into D (B) and semileptonic e-decays.

  • RHIC: tune to STAR D-meson data.

  • LHC: tune to NLO pQCD calculation.

2. Model (I):

Standard LO pQCD (PYTHIA):

4

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


2 model ii

N. Armesto

2. Model (II):

(Dainese et al '04; Eskola et al '04; poster by Loizides)

Detailed modeling of geometry.

pTparton>5 GeV

Characteristic feature: the mass effect is smaller for smaller lengths.

5

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


3 results for rhic

N. Armesto

RD/h=RAAD/RAAh (Dokshitzer-Kharzeev ’01).

  • q/g difference affects all pT.

  • Mass effects sizeable for pT<12 GeV.

  • Look at 7< pT<12 GeV.

  • v2 (expected ~ to that for h) and

    centrality dependence: work in progress.

3. Results for RHIC:

6

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


4 results for the lhc

N. Armesto

  • Small trigger bias effect (i.e. difference

    between massless c and b).

  • 10<pT<20 GeV: charm sensitive to color

    (g at low x), bottom to mass.

4. Results for the LHC:

Transport coefficient (density) scaled by multiplicity: factor 2.5 to 7

larger at the LHC than at RHIC (Armesto et al '04, Eskola et al '04).

Charm

Beauty

7

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


5 bottom at rhic i

N. Armesto

Data presented here by PHENIX

and STAR are consistent with

radiative energy loss provided

the contribution from b is small.

Greene

van Leeuwen

  • FONLL(Cacciari et al '98; '01; '05)partonic spectra supplemented with

    radiative Eloss via quenching weights plus FONLL fragmentation:

    * Uncertainties (mass variation; conservative) upto pT=6 GeV.

    * RAuAue can be ~0.4 in the range 5<pT<10 GeV.

5. Bottom at RHIC (I):

  • RHIC data in AuAu: electron spectra (PHENIX: Butsyk, Kwon; STAR: Bielcik,

    Laue, Zhang), weak correlation in pT with D/B, and contribution from B

    decays (Djordjevic et al '05; talks by Djordjevic and Vogt).

8

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


5 bottom at rhic ii

N. Armesto

Eskola et al '04

  • Larger transport coefficient?

    (but upper bound to come,

    hopefully, from correlations

    (PHENIX: Grau; STAR: Dietel, Magestro)).

  • How well do we control the production of heavy flavours at RHIC?

Cacciari et al '05

CDF '03, 1.96 TeV

5. Bottom at RHIC (II):

If RAuAue<0.4 in the range 5<pT<10 GeV:

  • Strong interaction of heavy quarks with the medium; hadronization

    inside? (talks by Djordjevic, Rapp, Teaney).

9

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


6 conclusions

N. Armesto

6. Conclusions:

  • Heavy flavours constitute an experimentally accessible testing

    ground for our understanding of radiative energy loss.

  • Both at RHIC and at the LHC heavy-to-light ratios offer solid

    possibilities to check the formalism like those presented here: D's for

    7<pT<12 GeV at RHIC, and D's and B's for 10<pT<20 GeV at the LHC.

  • Problems with single electron spectra in AuAu at RHIC may have

    several solutions: new effects, hadronization in medium, further

    constraints on the transport coefficient, contribution from b decays,...

  • Data presented here by PHENIX and STAR are consistent with

    radiative energy loss provided the contribution from b's is small.

  • Clarification of this issue will demand (at RHIC and at the LHC):

    * pp/dAu reference to be controlled (e.g. Kharzeev et al '03): new

    possibilities to check our understanding of HF production.

    * If possible, data for mesons, not only for electrons.

10

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


Backup i quenching weights

N. Armesto

Backup I: quenching weights

Mass effect smaller for smaller R=qhat L3/2, so small for small lengths.

11

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


Backup ii bottom in fonll

N. Armesto

Backup II: bottom in FONLL

Cacciari et al '03; '04

Reasonable description of b production.

12

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


Backup iii fixed vs variable l

N. Armesto

Backup III: fixed vs. variable L

To try to understand a disagreement with Djordjevic et al ‘05

  • mc=1.5 GeV,

    mb=4.75 GeV; no

    fragmentation yet.

  • qhat=1.2 GeV2/fm

    with fixed L=6 fm

    reproduce RAA(0-10%)

    ~0.2 for pions.

  • A large fixed length

    produces a larger

    effect of the mass on

    the Eloss: mass effect

    small for small L.

13

Heavy-to-light ratios as ...


  • Login