Unaccounted emissions from biofuels
Download
1 / 16

Unaccounted emissions from biofuels Alex Kaat, UNFCCC SBSTA event June 9 2011 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 95 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Unaccounted emissions from biofuels Alex Kaat, UNFCCC SBSTA event June 9 2011. What makes biofuels attractive…. UNFCCC as driving force: No accounting for combustion No mandatory accounting LULUCF An.1 No accounting (indirect) LUC non An. 1 Biofuel use: a result of climate policies

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Unaccounted emissions from biofuels Alex Kaat, UNFCCC SBSTA event June 9 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Unaccounted emissions from biofuels alex kaat unfccc sbsta event june 9 2011

Unaccounted emissions from biofuels

Alex Kaat, UNFCCC SBSTA event

June 9 2011


What makes biofuels attractive
What makes biofuels attractive…

UNFCCC as driving force:

  • No accounting for combustion

  • No mandatory accounting LULUCF An.1

  • No accounting (indirect) LUC non An. 1

    Biofuel use: a result of

  • climate policies

  • that have ignored land use emissions


Land use under different scenarios
Land use under different scenarios

  • Reference pathway (no serious climate policy)

Adapted from:

M Wise et al. Science May 2009;324:1183-86


Land use under different scenarios1
Land use under different scenarios

  • CO2 emission target of 450 ppm

  • Policies address fossil andterrestrial emissions.

Adapted from:

M Wise et al. Science May 2009;324:1183-86


Land use under different scenarios2
Land use under different scenarios

  • Modeled scenario (theoretical).

  • CO2 emission target of 450 ppm

  • Policies address fossil but notterrestrial emissions.

Adapted from:

M Wise et al. Science May 2009;324:1183-86


Land use emissions very substantial
Land use emissions: very substantial

Adapted from: J. Fargione et al. Science February 2008; 319: 1235-1238 


Indirect land use change even worse
Indirect land use change: even worse

CO2 payback time of total soybean mix due to expansion (Brazil):

Direct (35 years) + Indirect (211 years) = 246 years

Adapted from:

Lapola D M et al. PNAS 2010;107:3388-3393


Wi s concern widespread use peat soils
WI’s concern: widespread use peat soils

Energy yield and emission factor of typical biomass fuel crops on peatsoil, compared to fossil fuels.

Couwenberg 2007. IMCG-newsletter 2007-3 p.12-15


Case eu aims to meet ghg reduction
Case: EU aims to meet GHG reduction

  • Bio-energy: main climate strategy EU

  • Effort to prevent extremes in land use emissions

    - Hope REDD will solve parts of it…- ILUC?


Environmental implications 2020
Environmental implications 2020

Studies commissioned by EU DG-Trade:

  • Large imports from non-Annex 1 in 202050% ethanol, 41% diesel

    When also accounting ILUC:

  • Target higher than 5,6%: no GHG benefits

  • No fuel meets 50% reduction target

  • with ILUC 81-167% worse than fossil fuels 56 mln tonnes extra CO2 (IEEP 2010)


Eu just small at global scale
EU- just small at global scale

IEA BLUE Map Scenario, 50% reduction energy-related CO2 emissions from 2005


Conclusions
Conclusions

  • Biofuel expansion largely result of climate policies

  • Only limited expansion possible without negative environmental impacts

  • Not accounting LULUCF is disastrous.


What to do option 1
What to do: option 1

  • Biofuel combustion remains zero emission

  • But all (land-use) emissions accounted

  • also non annex I; also LUC and ILUC

    Negative sides:

  • Complicated

  • Complete new methodology; why only for biofuels?


What to do option 2
What to do: Option 2

  • Biofuel combustion accounted; like fossil

  • Sequestration in feed stocks accounted (thus rewarded).

  • In the longer term, maybe the best system

    Negative side:

  • Demands global accounting system

  • Why only for biofuels?


Options 3
Options 3

  • No accounting combustion of bio-energy

  • Mandatory LULUCF accounting (all activities)

  • Standards to ban biofuels with huge LUC, ILUC and other emissions in non-Annex 1

  • Possibly best for this moment…

    Negative side:

  • Non-Annex 1 not accounted, only extremes excluded

  • Incentive to import from non-Annex 1

  • Dependent on supply-chain certification system


Unaccounted emissions from biofuels alex kaat unfccc sbsta event june 9 2011

Thank you

Alex Kaat

Wetlands International

Alex.kaat@wetlands.org


ad
  • Login