1 / 21

M.E.L.V.I.N. Electronic Voting System for a Legislative Body May02-05 04/30/02

M.E.L.V.I.N. Electronic Voting System for a Legislative Body May02-05 04/30/02. Introduction. Members: Robert E. Meyer III Dan Phan-Quoc Kieu Michael T. Riley Andrew Siefer Advisors: Dr. J. W. Lamont Dr. R. E. Patterson III Client: GSB (ex-client). Outline. Introduction

axl
Download Presentation

M.E.L.V.I.N. Electronic Voting System for a Legislative Body May02-05 04/30/02

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. M.E.L.V.I.N.Electronic Voting System for a Legislative BodyMay02-0504/30/02

  2. Introduction Members:Robert E. Meyer IIIDan Phan-Quoc KieuMichael T. Riley Andrew Siefer Advisors: Dr. J. W. Lamont Dr. R. E. Patterson III Client: GSB (ex-client)

  3. Outline • Introduction • Problem Statement • Design Objectives • End Product Description • Assumptions and Limitations • Technical Approach • Evaluation of Success • Recommendations • Budgets • Lessons Learned • Closing Summary • Questions

  4. Problem Statement The Government of the Student Body takes many votes per session. These votes are currently taken by roll call voting. Roll call voting is extremely time consuming. This leads to long meetings and wasted time.

  5. Our Mission We are to design a voting system that will save the GSB time.

  6. Design Objectives: Hardware • Basic Voting Functions • Cost Effectiveness • Ease of Use • Fits Current Infrastructure • Expandability • Environmental Adaptability

  7. Design Objectives: Software • Ability to Tally Results • Logging of All Votes • Attendance Monitor

  8. End-Product Description • Basic Voting functions • ID Referencing • Display of Results • Port to Microsoft Excel • Attendance

  9. M.E.L.V.I.N. Interface

  10. Conceptual Drawing

  11. Assumptions and Limitations • Cost • Training • Funding • Available Parts

  12. Technical Approach • Daisy Chaining of Modules • PC Interface • Router Control • Router Configuration

  13. Evaluation of Project Success • Design of System Completed • Software Design Completed • Development of Software Completed • Partial Development of Hardware • Partial Hardware/Software Integration

  14. Recommendations • Ensure Rapid Budget Approval • Guarantee interest in project • Departmental Parts Database • Saves time during R & D Phase

  15. Initial Budget

  16. Actual Budget

  17. Human Budget

  18. Lessons Learned • Technical Knowledge • Visual Basic • Microprocessor Development • Digital Circuit Design • Non-technical Knowledge • Third Party Relations • Budget Development

  19. Closing Summary Our system will provide: • Faster Voting Time • Greater Flexibility • Logging of Votes • Improved Time Efficiency

  20. Project Demonstration MELVIN and Modules

  21. Questions?????

More Related