1 / 33

Market Vertical Coordination

Market Vertical Coordination. Communication and distribution Historically relied upon price signals Markets and spot negotiation Moving toward non-market transactions Contracts and long term negotiation. Trends. Specialization

Download Presentation

Market Vertical Coordination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Market Vertical Coordination • Communication and distribution • Historically relied upon price signals • Markets and spot negotiation • Moving toward non-market transactions • Contracts and long term negotiation

  2. Trends • Specialization • Producing or processing only one or a few products (Farming, Packing) • Diversification • Multiple plants • Multiple products • Complementary products

  3. Trends • Decentralization • Move away from central markets • Drivers of trend • Transportation • Processing technology • Communication systems • Economies of scale

  4. Integration • Vertical and horizontal • Ownership • Mergers • Growth to include function • Contract • Formal agreement

  5. Integration? • Improved communication and control of the food supply to increase customer satisfaction? • An attempt by processors to drive down farm level prices for short and long term gain?

  6. Reasons for Integration • Profit potential • Risk reduction • Improved bargaining power • Operational efficiency • Improved communication

  7. Food Industry Alliances • Preferred/exclusive suppliers • Marketing contracts • HyVee and Farmland pork

  8. Production Ag Integration • Premium Standard Farms • Smithfield Foods • Largest pork packer and producer • Cargill • Nutrena, Production, Excel • Corn genetics, grain handling, processing • US Premium Beef • Iowa Quality Beef Supply Coop • Farrow-Finish grain farm

  9. Johnson Amendment, 2001 • Prohibits packers from owning, feeding, or controlling livestock for more than 14 prior to slaughter • Amended to allow contracting • Farmer must materially participate • Excludes coops and poultry • Packers would divest in • Hogs 18 months • Cattle 180 days

  10. Contract Integration • Market specification contracts • Forward contracts • Common and general • Resource providing contracts • Prescribed inputs and management • Management and income sharing • Greater integrator control

  11. Integration into farming • Horizontal integration • Fewer and larger farms • Networking and alliances • Vertical integration • Cooperatives • Input production • Grain and meat processing

  12. Value of Selected Commodities Produced under Production Contracts, 1997 Source: USDA, Economic Research Service, 1997 Agricultural Resource Management Study, special analysis

  13. Value of Selected Commodities Produced under Marketing Contracts, 1997 Source: USDA, Economic Research Service, 1997 Agricultural Resource Management Study, special analysis

  14. Types of contracts • Market-specification terms • Product characteristics • Basis of price and payment • Examples • Forward deliverable contracts • Little management control by buyer

  15. Types of contracts • Resource-providing terms • Inputs are specified by buyer • Little price protection • Examples • Specialty grain • Processing vegetables • High degree of management by buyer

  16. Types of contracts • Management and income guaranteeing • Specifies characteristics and input use • Provides price and maybe production risk • Examples • Hogs, poultry • High degree of management by buyer

  17. Contract grain production • Forward contracts for delivery • Specialty grain • Seed corn, popcorn, white corn • Formula contract tied to another market • Silage production • Production for grain

  18. Cattle Production Contracts • Commercial feedlots • Feedlot provides the management not the buyer or cattle owner • Custom grazing • Cowherds • Stockers

  19. Cattle Marketing Contracts Captive supplies of cattle • Under the buyer’s control 14 or more days before delivery • Marketing contracts • Forward contract for delivery • Formula contract • Types of captive supplies, 1999 • Packer owned 4% (now 6-8%) • Under contract 28%

  20. Captive Supply Research Results 1993 KSU Study: Captive supply shipments associated with a $0.15/cwt to $0.31/cwt decline in cash fed cattle prices 1996 KSU - OSU Study: 1% contract deliveryassociated with $0.02/cwt to $0.03/cwt. cattle price 1% packer fed deliveryassociated with $0.13/cwt. to $0.19/cwt. cattle price 1% mktg agrmnt deliveryassociated with $0.04/cwt to $0.26/cwt. cattle price

  21. Hog Production Contracts • Farmer is paid to provide building and labor • Hog owner provides inputs and management • Limited production risk, no price risk • Currently 33-35% of hogs produced under a production contract

  22. Hog marketing contracts • Relatively new - growth since 1993 • Open market was 87-89% in 1993 • Open market was about 15% in 2003 • Product specification important • Genetics, inputs, food safety • Delivery scheduling • Types of contracts • Formula price • Share price risk

  23. Risk Sharing Contracts • Window contract • Set upper and lower bound • Share the “pain and gain” outside • Cost based price floor • Minimum price tied to feed price • Pay back “loan” • Give up part of higher prices

  24. Contract Examples • Iowa Attorney General • http://www.state.ia.us/government/ag/ag_contracts/ • Current research on web • Hogs: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/lawrence/HOGS.htm • Production and Marketing Characteristics of U.S. Pork Producers, 2000, • Understanding Hog Marketing Contracts - September 18, 1999 • Cattle: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ135/lawrence/ • Packer Concentration, Captive Supplies and Fed Cattle Prices

  25. Packer Motivation for Increased Pork and Beef Marketing Contracts, 1999.a

  26. Producer’s Motivation for Entering Marketing Contract with Packer • Access to capital and better financing • Reduced price risk • Assure a buyer • Reduced marketing costs • Improved prices or premiums

  27. Reasons for production integration • Greater control • Product quality / specifications • Scheduling • Industrialization • Risk management • Access to resources

  28. Motivations and Implications • Profit potential??? • Multiply management • Production efficiency and product quality • Thin market concerns • Encourages expansion by reducing risk

  29. So What???? • How do you establish value in a system in which there is little or no open market activity? • Do you need to? • How do you determine returns to the various segments?

  30. Open market impacts • Packer may have ability to call supplies • Formula tied to cash market • Potentially depress prices • Potentially increase volatility • Value-based pricing

More Related