physics and physical science learning community
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Physics and Physical Science Learning Community

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

Physics and Physical Science Learning Community - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Physics and Physical Science Learning Community. “Make and Take” “PLU Workshop”. Zo Webster, Associate Professor Physics. Overview. Philosophy Who participated Participant impressions Objective results Conclusion - K12 educators need more physical science content knowledge.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Physics and Physical Science Learning Community' - avent

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
physics and physical science learning community

Physics and Physical Science Learning Community

“Make and Take”

“PLU Workshop”

Zo Webster, Associate Professor Physics

  • Philosophy
  • Who participated
  • Participant impressions
  • Objective results
  • Conclusion - K12 educators need more physical science content knowledge
professional learning communities
Professional Learning Communities
  • Theory: Bring people together to jointly define mission of an organization and to learn things to help provide continuous improvement to make the organization succeed. (DuFour & Eaker 1998)
  • We needed to have to have a slightly different sort of community - one of interested teachers willing to improve their own teaching within a community of likeminded professionals
what we did 1 invite the teachers
What we did. #1. invite the teachers
  • 4 sessions, 3 hours each, spread out one per month, January - April
  • Billed as make-n-take, but we didn’t always make!
  • PLU offered as incentive
  • 2 sessions about circuits (Webster)
  • 2 sessions about magnetism (Winfrey& Shaw)
hands on minds on
Hands-on, minds-on
  • Used GPS as guide!
  • Started with a reading (and food)
  • Activities pre-planned - BUT always had teachers performing experiments to answer questions
    • Used mix of $ and $$ equipment and
    • All teachers took home SOME equipment each time - related to topic of day
  • Two faculty to help guide - needed!
  • Summarize conclusions/findings a few times each session
  • In all, 11 teachers attended one or more of the workshops. 8 people attended 3 or more sessions
  • What did you value most?
  • #1 response - “networking” “talking with other teachers” “camaraderie”
  • #2 “increased content knowledge”
how will information gained help with student achievement
How will information gained help with student achievement?
  • “Hands-on learning -> hands-on teaching”
  • “I believe students learn by doing.”
  • “Shows me how to bring about a deeper understanding about concept.”
  • “Hopefully dispel some misconceptions”
  • “By correcting my own misconceptions so I don’t pass them on to my kids.”
  • My misconceptions being cleared up will allow me to explain it better to my students.”
community part worked
Community part worked
  • Networking
  • Spending time with other professionals
  • High quality activities that can be used in classrooms tomorrow!
  • People enjoyed themselves.
  • Content knowledge development?
pre test post test each session
Pre-test/Post-test each session
  • Some students gain each time
  • Gains may not persist (same test given in Jan/Feb and some participants regressed back to pre-test on Jan. content)
circuits out of 10
Circuits - out of 10
  • Not all content on test explicitly covered in the series of two workshops
  • Even high school teachers don’t know everything when they arrive
local needs highlighted
Local needs highlighted
  • Some content areas weak - even among experienced high school teachers
  • Although 55% of MCSD teachers are trained by CSU, insufficient Physics and Physical science content and pedagogy
  • Perhaps CSU should consider requiring a physical science and a life science in Area D for all
k 12 teachers need us
K-12 teachers need us!
  • We need to continue to have high content standards for our undergraduates
  • We need to teach in an inquiry way so our future teachers will teach that way
  • Content intensive workshops for existing teachers need to be continued
  • How can we get MCSD to invite us to help with PD they plan?
areas for growth
Areas for Growth
  • More advertising - need a list of principals and science teachers and need to know that emails get through the spam filters!
  • At least one funding agency has a minimum of 12 teachers - so need to build interest
  • More cheap ideas for equipment to give away and share and use
  • Or an ‘equipment share’ van. We have workshops surrounding the equipment we have to loan.
csu as 1
CSU as #1
  • To stand out in the state as a place for math and science education, we need to have a high profile with in-service teachers
  • AND provide high quality undergraduate programs in math, biology, chemistry, earth & space science secondary education
toot my horn
Toot my horn!
  • Thanks to support of College of Science for encouraging work with schools, I have been attending meetings with Dept. of Ed about science policy for 3 years.
  • This led to my being asked to chair a committee to develop high school astronomy standards for the state of GA
  • And… that led to writing a grant to develop a curriculum to go with those new standards
  • Which led to being awarded the grant!
  • Georgians Experience Astronomy Research in Schools (GEARS)
  • In partnership with Georgia Southern. GA Dept. of Education as lead.