1 / 17

Fleet Synthetic Training; A Perspective and Way Ahead 7 Sep 11

Fleet Synthetic Training; A Perspective and Way Ahead 7 Sep 11. UNCLASSIFIED. 1. Introduction Requirements and Mechanics FST Strengths and Weaknesses The Price of Admission; A Perspective on the Future of FST. SOE. TTGP Facilities. Bldg 61. Bldg 24. Bldg 59. Bldg 56. Third Fleet.

Download Presentation

Fleet Synthetic Training; A Perspective and Way Ahead 7 Sep 11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fleet Synthetic Training;A Perspective and Way Ahead7 Sep 11 UNCLASSIFIED 1

  2. Introduction Requirements and Mechanics FST Strengths and Weaknesses The Price of Admission; A Perspective on the Future of FST SOE

  3. TTGP Facilities Bldg 61 Bldg 24 Bldg 59 Bldg 56 Third Fleet Bldg 58 3

  4. TTGP FCA Manning PNW 3 Contractors Det Yoko 2 GS 10 Contractors San Diego 158 Military 25 GS 78 Contractors Hawaii 5 Contractors 4 UNCLASSIFIED

  5. TTGP Mission Statement As directed by the Fleet Training Strategy, train Carrier and Expeditionary Strike Groups in the doctrine, tactics, techniques, and procedures for operations in an integrated Naval, Joint, and Combined environment. Conduct tactical war fighting training for officers en route assignment as Strike Group Commanders, Commodores, Air Wing Commanders, Commanding Officers and Staff Officers. As Commander Pacific Fleet’s Executive Agent for the Navy Continuous Training Environment (NCTE), operate and maintain an extensive distributed in-port training architecture connecting the Fleet concentration areas in Hawaii, Washington, California and Japan and provide a persistent node for the Joint National Training Capability (JNTC). Provide C4I, supply and security support to Point Loma tenant commands. 5

  6. Carrier Strike Groups’ Training Cycle SUSTAINMENT PHASE FST – Operational FST – Sustainment DEPLOYMENT JMET JTFEX FST – Joint Strike Group CDR & staff FALLON COMPTUEX INTEGRATED PHASE FST – Group Cmdr MISSION ESSENTIAL TASK LIST Group Cmdr Training Warfare CDR & staff Integrated ASW Course SLAMEX FST – Warfare Cmdr BMDEX Warfare Cmdrs Course Unit BASIC PHASE FST- Unit Wargame (Sim) FST (Sim) Live U/W 4 of 9 Integrated work-up events simulation based

  7. Fleet Synthetic Training (FST) • Series of exercises covering wide range of training levels • Scenario based • Scalable • Distributed • Ships/crews at home station Force Group Unit Joint and Coalition Integration

  8. FST Technical Implementation GCCS ESG BFTT - US Ships NCTE . . TTGP NCTE / JTEN Decision Makers (Staff) Real World C4I Systems CSG Link 16 Secure VoIP Chat NCTE, JTEN, SIPR, CENTRIXS Distributed Training Architecture Ships Pierside Combat System Sensor Operator Action Officer Scenario Generation and Control Simulated Sensors JSAF Shore-Based Trainers Exercise Control Combat System Sensor Operator Action Officer Training Staff Exercise Control Comms

  9. SHIP COMM BFTT COMM TRNG LAU KG-40 Lk-11 DTS AMN Cooperative Engagement Capability Simulated Nav Electronic Warfare NAVSSI BLK 3 Undersea Warfare SLQ-32 A(V) BOPC 3 CEC BOPC 2 WSN-x 1/2/5/7 SQQ-89 Combat System SQQ-89 OBT BOPC 1 BFTT BEWT CTA NAV SIM Q-89 LAU BFTT (Future) Digital Computer INES CM/C4I SIM Strike SSDS MK 1 TWCS LAU GFCP Synthetic Theater of War The BFTT Family of Stims Ship Self-Defense GCCS TWCS SSDS MK 2 DCM AEGIS ACTS MK 50 AWS ACDS CDS Link 4A, 11, 16 STIM / Sim Data Collection RESS LAU AEGIS RESS SPS-48 TSSS C2P/ CDLMS SPS-49 SPN-46 SPQ-9A/B, Mk-23 TAS Mk-91 NSSMS AIMS MK-XII IFF SPS-40, 48, 49, 55, 67, 73 AIMS MK XII IFF Link Simulation Air Control Simulation Air and Surface Warfare Lk-4A DTS Lk-16 TML 9

  10. OPFOR is scalable in size and sophistication Stretches scarce training resources Provides opportunity to better utilize limited at sea periods and to rehearse operations Exercise C2 in kinetic phase of conflict Flag Officer to console operator fidelity varies with warfare area Connectivity subject to at sea issues Complements live training; not a substitute for going to sea FST Strengths and Weaknesses 10

  11. FST Strengths and Weaknesses “This visionary new training methodology is now integral to the way we prepare our nations deploying strike groups. It creates a virtual environment in which the Navy stresses critical Command and Control warfare skills and fine tunes its basic warfighting competencies without going to sea.” VADM Daly Deputy Commander, US Fleet Forces Command U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Dec 2009 11

  12. Yokosuka, JA USS GEORGE WASHINGTON CSG Staff (CTF 70) C7F MOC USS BLUE RIDGE USS SHILOH USS CURTIS WILBUR USS JOHN S. MCCAIN USS COWPENS USS LASSEN FST-J 11-71 (BMD) Feb-Mar 2011 Fort Greely, AK 49th MDB Alaska Schriever AFB, CO 100th MDB Agency Participation MDA Missile Defense Integrated Ops Center Joint CommandsUS Pacific Command US Strategic Command US Northern Command US Forces Japan Japan JTF-BMD/JASDF ADC JMSDF MSO SDFLT 6th Escort Division JS CHOKAI JS ATAGO Pt Loma, CA TTGP DTCP Yokosuka, JA TTGP-Det Yoko Japan • OPFOR • (Constructive) • Air • Submarine • Missile • Surface Pearl Harbor , HI CPF MOC USS PORT ROYAL USS HOPPER USS CHUNG HOON Okinawa, JA 1-1 ADA Patriot Hawaii Hickam AFB 613th AOC Bilateral Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) event integrating Fleet HQ’s, MDA, Army, USAF & Japan (JMSDF/JASDF) units Hickam AFB 94th AAMDC

  13. EWTGPAC, JEWL, Coronado I Corps (FWD) 607 ASOG 65 FiB Land Comp ExCon Cell Camp Rilea, OR 116 ACS 121 ACS 123 ACS TTGP DTCC, San Diego CAOC (3 BCD, TACRON LNO) CTF 72, CTF 74 NWDC LNO Sydney, AUS HMAS DARWIN COMAUSATG HMAS WATSON FST-J 10-72 (CTF 76) - May 2010 CTF 70 BWC/IWC DESRON 15 USS GEORGE WASHINGTON USS CURTIS WILBUR USS STETHEM USS MUSTIN USS MCCAMPBELL USS JOHN S MCCAIN Number Units - 35Participants ~ 1,600Constructive Joint Forces: 40 Inf Div, 3 USAF Air Wings, & CTF 70 (GWSG) (-) Constructive Coalition Forces:HMAS MANOORA, HMAS KANIMBLA, HMAS TOBRUK, & Regt Battle Group TTGP-Det Yoko USS COWPENS USS FITZGERALD Japan CTF 76 (ESG 7) CPR 11 31 MEU TACRON 12 USS ESSEX USS HARPERS FERRY OPFOR Constructive Support 1 Enemy CVBG 6 Ships 3 Enemy SAGs 29 Ships 1 Enemy Sub Gp 4 Subs 1 Enemy Airbase 33 A/C 4 CDCM Sites 4 Batteries 6 ADA Companies 16 ADA Sites 1 Enemy Inf Bde 2 Regts/AR Bn/Avn Bn 2 Irregular Warfare Gps 16 HVI/HPTs Australia Coalition/Joint Forcible Entry Operations (Amphibious/Air Assault) against conventional & irregular OPFOR 13

  14. A Perspective on the Future of FST; The Price of Admission • Must be compliant with all governing standards • DIS, HLA, etc. • Be cognizant of data flow rates within the network • Develop systems with a global view • Not just “trainer-in-a-box” ; never stand alone • Interoperability across architecture is critical • “Plug and Play” is a misnomer under best of circumstances • Balance fidelity with cost and delivery • Aviation full motion trainer not required for C2 training events • MRT3 as example of what is sufficient for C2 event

  15. A Perspective on the Future of FST;The Price of Admission • Focused warfare events vice larger force-wide events • BMDEX as signpost for ASW, ASUW, AAW, etc • Work towards Flag to Petty Officer kill chain • Opportunities for middle-ware solutions • No rearchitecture where elegant middle-ware can resolve • Tension between resources to support Shore-Based Trainers and resources for Distributed Training • Room for both, however, track record of underestimated support tail for shore-based trainers Fleet Synthetic Training, as a complement to at-sea events, is the key to ensuring readiness in an environment of fiscal austerity

  16. Questions ?

More Related