1 / 12

Executive Evaluation E2 Public Policy Evaluation Office National Department of Planning

Executive Evaluation E2 Public Policy Evaluation Office National Department of Planning. Comparison with other well known methodologies. Information. Process . Strengths . Weaknesses. Example. To analyze information use and produced To analyze focalizations tools

aurora
Download Presentation

Executive Evaluation E2 Public Policy Evaluation Office National Department of Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Executive Evaluation E2 Public Policy Evaluation Office National Department of Planning

  2. Comparison with other well known methodologies Information Process Strengths Weaknesses

  3. Example • To analyze information use and produced • To analyze focalizations tools • To evaluate core and support processes • To evaluate project selection criteria • To identified and evaluate supervision mechanism and project monitoring • To determine national policy coordination mechanism • To produce adjust plans • To determine socioeconomic changes in population • To evaluate institutional capacity changes • To evaluate beneficiaries perception of actions or results • To evaluate goals accomplishment and logic frame • Ti verified facilities and its sustainability

  4. Analytical framework Evaluación de ProgramasGubernamentales - EPG CHILE Budgetary constraints and complexities Information problems e2 • design with wide participation of experts. • Pilots in different sectors and government levels. • Adjust and reinvention. SINERGIA Diagnosis process e2 Absent of evaluations and problems with those existents Program Assestment Rating Tool Review – PART USA

  5. Questions Target Users Need to know in a short time why a program is not working properly ? Need to have a reference to evaluate the program in the future? Programs Managers Planning Offices Need to order Program information and processes? E2 Produce standard and comparable information among programs Allows to evaluate a major number of programs that need analysis Intersectorial Evaluation Comite Support redesign processes and realignment of strategies, and budgetary decisions

  6. Methodological approach

  7. Information Description based on documental information. DESK REVIEW Rebuild missing information using other sources. Field work no ¿Is internal information enoughtto describe the program? si Description complete Program evaluation Qualification Criteria 1 a 4 or yes / no

  8. Evaluation topics

  9. Evaluation process Turns into standard indicators by topics

  10. Standard indicators

  11. Information analysis Information is: Disposable Up to date Timely Complete Information quality about design

  12. Products • Description (Logic Frame) • Evaluation • Information Check Box • Conclusions, global diagnosis, and adjusts plans.

More Related