slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Measuring and Monitoring Subjective Well-Being - The German Experience Heinz-Herbert Noll GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Measuring and Monitoring Subjective Well-Being - The German Experience Heinz-Herbert Noll GESIS Leibniz Institute - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 153 Views
  • Uploaded on

Measuring and Monitoring Subjective Well-Being - The German Experience Heinz-Herbert Noll GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Social Indicators Research Centre (ZSi) Mannheim, Germany www.gesis.org/social-indicators

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Measuring and Monitoring Subjective Well-Being - The German Experience Heinz-Herbert Noll GESIS Leibniz Institute ' - augustin


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Measuring and Monitoring Subjective Well-Being - The German Experience

Heinz-Herbert Noll

GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

Social Indicators Research Centre (ZSi)

Mannheim, Germany

www.gesis.org/social-indicators

Satellite Meeting - Measuring Subjective Well-Being: An Opportunity for National Statistical Offices?

Florence, July 23-24

slide2

Situation in Germany:

Strong reluctance of German statistical office (destatis) to collect “subjective information”, e.g. data on Subjective Well-Being; exceptions as yet almost completely restricted to European surveys like, e.g. EU-SILC

 partly due to „division of labour“ in collection and supply of data

Well developed science based data infrastructure beyond official statistics

Long tradition of measuring, monitoring & reporting subjective well- being

slide3

Science Driven Survey-Data Infrastructure – Two Examples

  • German Welfare Survey
  • - Emerged from large scale project on social Indicators during the 1970s
  • - Strong focus on the measurement of subjective well-being,
  • - Large number of different SWB – measures (incl. Ill-Being)
  • - Survey rounds in 1978, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1990 (East Germany), 1993, 1998
  • More Information: http://www.gesis.org/en/services/data/survey-data/welfare-survey/
  • German Socio-Economic Household Panel Study (SOEP)
    • Longitudinal Survey (Panel)
    • First round in 1984
    • Since then every year
    • East Germany included in 1990
    • Large sample (2006: ca. 11.000 households with more than 20.000 respondents)
    • Complex sample design, includes non-German population
    • Multitude of SWB-measures, among them life satisfaction, several domain satisfactions

- Personal interviews with each household member 16 years +

More Information:http://www.diw.de/english/soep/29012.html

slide4

Several other important national Survey – Programmes, e.g.

 German General Social Survey (ALLBUS)

 German Ageing Survey  SWB as one of the key topics

International Survey – Programmes (see Noll 2008), eg.

 European Social Survey

 European Quality of Life Survey

 International Social Survey Programme

 World Value Survey / European Values Study

slide7

Long Tradition in Reporting on SWB as Part of General Social Reporting

 Datenreport = Most Important and Popular Comprehensive German Social Report

 Since 2nd edition in 1985 joint venture of official statistics (destatis) and academic social research (since 1989: GESIS, WZB)

 Academic part titled „Living Conditions and Subjective Well-Being“; (English Version of „Datenreport 1985“ published in Social Indicators Research, Vol. 19, no 1, 1987)

slide8

 Focus on Quality of Life in Terms of Objective Living Conditions and Subjective Well-Being (as well as their interrelations)

 ‚Well-Being‘ = combination of good living conditions and high level of SWB

 goal for policy making

slide9

Example from Datenreport 1985:

„Life satisfaction: past, present, future“

slide10

Example Datenreport 1985:

„Importance of life domains and con-cerns for well-being and satisfaction“

slide11

 Latest Edition (12th) of Datenreport = 2008

Available for Download at:

www.gesis.org/datenreport/

slide15

Conclusions from German Experience:

  •  Official Statistics not needed as basic provider of SWB - data; there are plenty of good quality data on various aspect of SWB since many years
  •  Data provided by statistical offices are not necessarily of better quality than data from other sources
  • Quality of official survey data may suffer from the same kind of problems as non- official survey data, e.g.
  • - biased samples / non-response (if not compulsory)
    • - inappropriate question wordings / formats
    • - inadequate answering scales
    • - problems of comparability or equivalence in international surveys
  •  Major advantage of official surveys are large sample sizes, allowing detailed analysis for small population subgroups, regions etc
  •  Measures of SWB (not only life satisfaction) should though be included into official surveys – e.g. like HBS, LFS, EU-SILC – in order to considerably enrich these surveys and to enhance their analytical potential in various ways
ad