1 / 22

New Approaches to Study the Cyst Nematode/Sudden Death Syndrome Interaction in Soybean

New Approaches to Study the Cyst Nematode/Sudden Death Syndrome Interaction in Soybean. Michael Schmidt Jason P. Bond Ahmad Fakhoury Southern Illinois University. Distribution of SCN and SDS. SCN SCN & SDS. Soybean Cyst Nematode. Heterodera glycines Many HG types classified

astrid
Download Presentation

New Approaches to Study the Cyst Nematode/Sudden Death Syndrome Interaction in Soybean

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Approaches to Study the Cyst Nematode/Sudden Death Syndrome Interaction in Soybean Michael Schmidt Jason P. Bond Ahmad Fakhoury Southern Illinois University

  2. Distribution of SCN and SDS SCN SCN & SDS

  3. Soybean Cyst Nematode • Heteroderaglycines • Many HG types classified • Resistance is qualitative/quantitative

  4. Root Knot Nematode • Two species of concern in Illinois • Meloidogyne incognita (southern root-knot) • Has over 500 different hosts including corn • Meloidogynehapla (northern root-knot) • More limited host range, corn is a non host • Both species are important in soybean, crops, orchards, vineyards, etc.

  5. Sudden Death Syndrome • Fusariumvirguliforme (Fv). • Soilborne, root rotting fungus that colonizes tap root and crown. • Produces a toxin causing foliar symptoms (scorch).

  6. Components of SDS Resistance • Foliar symptoms- resistance to toxin effects, measured as DX. DX=DS*DI/9. DS= disease severity valued on a 1-9 scale. DI=disease incidence as a percentage of plants in plot having disease. • Root infection/colonization-resistance to the fungal pathogen

  7. SCN Interactions with SDS • Synergistic – • Roy et al., 1989- greenhouse • McLean and Lawrence, 1993 - greenhouse • Rupe et al., 1991; field trials • Hershman et al., 1990, field trials • Xing and Westphal, 2006 - microplots • Additive • Gao et al., 2006 - greenhouse

  8. Limitations - SCN/SDS Research • Field studies were/are conducted in fields with SCN • SCN densities – generally the resolution at field level. • Providing an environment suitable for expression of SDS. • Difficult y in quantifying Fv in soil and roots. • Need for the right compliment of soybean isolines contrasting for SCN and SDS resistance.

  9. New Tools to Study the Nematode/Fv/Soybean Interaction • Develop a transformation system for Fv • Generate fluorescing strains of the fungus – GFP = Green fluorescing protein. • Identify GFP phenotypes differing in aggressiveness toward soybean. To study the infection & colonization To screen for resistance

  10. Restriction Enzyme Mediated Integration (REMI) Linearized Plasmid Fungal DNA Integration of the Linearized Plasmid New Phenotypes Developed Phenotypic Analysis Isolation & Characterization of Regions Flanking the Integration Characterizing the disrupted gene(s)

  11. GFP Strain in Soybean Roots

  12. REMI Results • An aggressive Fv isolate known as Mont1 (Monticello, IL) was chosen as source population for transformation. • Several GFP strains were produced. • An aggressive strain of Fv was identified. • A non-aggressive strain was identified.

  13. OBJECTIVE: To use the aggressive and non-aggressive strains to: • Determine the role of SCN and RKN in the ability of Fv to penetrate and colonize soybean roots. • Determine the role of SCN and RKN in the ability of Fv to cause SDS foliar symptoms.

  14. Experimental Design • Greenhouse experiment. • Five soybean cultivars different in their resistance to SCN, RKN, and SDS. • Cultivar s were challenged with the GFP-expressing aggressive strain and the GFP-expressing non-aggressive strain. • Cultivars were co-challenged with SCN and RKN. • The experiment consisted of 30 treatments replicated 5 times. • Duration of the experiment was 15 days. • Fv root colonization quantified via QPCR. • SDS leaf scorch evaluated on a 1-9 scale.

  15. Cultivars

  16. Inoculum Five cultivars x Six inoculum levels = 30 treatments. Inoculum: SCN=2300egs/plant, RKN=2400 eggs/plant, Fv=7,700,000spores.

  17. Greenhouse Experiment Waterbath system maintains constant temperature across all experimental units. Five replications, sample size of 3 plants. ~0.5 liter soil/container.

  18. Fungus Fungus + SCN Fungus +RKN

  19. Results • Co-inoculation with Fv and either SCN or RKN lead to a significant increase in Fv root colonization and SDS foliar symptoms for all cultivars. • Co-inoculating with the fungus and the nematode can overwhelm plant resistance to SDS under greenhouse conditions.

More Related