1 / 34

Developing Primary Science In-Service Courses @ Science Learning Centre: East Midlands

Developing Primary Science In-Service Courses @ Science Learning Centre: East Midlands. Dr Tina Jarvis University of Leicester UK. Outline of talk. Introduction to Science Learning Centres in England Research giving a picture of primary science in England

astra
Download Presentation

Developing Primary Science In-Service Courses @ Science Learning Centre: East Midlands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing Primary Science In-Service Courses @ Science Learning Centre: East Midlands Dr Tina Jarvis University of Leicester UK

  2. Outline of talk • Introduction to Science Learning Centres in England • Research giving a picture of primary science in England • Research on the effect of in-service on teachers and pupils • Implications for in-service education

  3. National Network of Science Learning Centres York East Midlands National Centre at York 9 Regional Centres Courses for all levels – primary to FE Courses for all colleagues – teachers, technicians, teaching assistants

  4. Science Learning Centre East Midlands • A collaboration between: • University of Leicester • University of Nottingham • Bishop Grosseteste College, Lincoln • Courses take place at each venue.

  5. Courses for: • Early years teachers • Primary teachers • Secondary teachers • Technicians Linked optional opportunities to take a Post-Graduate Certificate in Educational Studies with tutorial support

  6. Primary Science in England • A required part of the English National Curriculum. • Originally a core subject equal to maths and English but in practice is seen as less important. • Pupils have approximately 2-3 hours a week. • Science is often presented in a didactic way. • Pupils rarely carry out independent • open-ended investigations.

  7. Teachers’ lack science knowledge which inhibits posing open questions. • Potentially disruptive children discourage provision of practical activities. • Limited equipment makes organisation difficult. • Limited time restricts setting up and clearing away practical work. • Oldest children spend long periods revising for the Standard Assessment Tasks at 11 years old.

  8. The research • AstraZeneca Science Teaching Trust • 2 year in-service programme 1999 - 2000 • Schools • Intakes from socially deprived areas • Under performance in national science tests • and/or • OFSTED reports highlighting science as a • weakness • 31 City of Leicester primary schools • 70 teachers • 1878 pupils aged 6-12

  9. Primary pupils’ attitudes to science in schools and in society: Attitude Instrument • Liking school in the whole school experience. • Science investigations attitudes about science experiments. • Science enthusiasm: about in science at school & at home. • Social context views on the uses of science to improve the human condition. • Science as difficult subject ascertains whether children think science is an easy or difficult subject. • Interest in space probes pupils’ views of the value of space exploration • There was also a cognitive test.

  10. Item responses for Being in School (Means)

  11. Liking school sub-scale: Year 2 & 6 children's attitudes: Jan 2000 (means) Sig. Diff. ** p < 1% * P < 5%

  12. Item responses for Science experiments scale(means)

  13. Responses for Sub-scales in What I really think of science broken down by year group for Jan 2000 data

  14. Science enthusiasm scores by gender & year for January 1999 and 2000 (Means) Decreases in enthusiasm across the six year groups are always significant p<1% anova. ** Sig, gender difference, p<1% *Sig. gender diff p<5%, t-test °° Sig.diff between boys and girls p<1%, two way-analysis of variance, F(1,783)= 4.489

  15. Previous research informed course design • Two teachers or more from each school - more likely to have positive changes in classroom practice and dissemination. • The course content was developed after discussions with head teachers & teachers so they had ownership. • Subject knowledge support was provided by 8 days contact time as research indicated that less than this would not result in conceptual changes. • Teachers were required to do school-based work with some tutorial support as in-service outside the classroom often does not change teaching practice.

  16. 10-day in-service course over 1 year • Developing and Assessing Investigations • Developing open-ended investigations in • Electricity • Melting • Evaporation and dissolving • Friction • Tutor visits supported classroom follow-up activities.

  17. Assessing teachers’ confidence,attitudes to science and cognition • Personal information eg gender & experience • Confidence about teaching science, English, mathematics, and ICT • Confidence on delivering Primary Science • Science attitude scale of 49 items asking about importance of • i) Encouraging pupil initiative, interest and wonder • ii) Systematic, structured approaches to learning • iii) Empirical, pupil-participative science • iv) In-service education • v) Child-centred, constructivist process • vi) Formative assessment • Cognitive test

  18. Teachers’ changes in cognitive scores (means) ** p<1% * p<5% Sig improvement Paired t-test / Wilcoxen test for N=46 on both tests

  19. Teacher types according to score range (high, average or low) High and Low cells are at 5% significance at least with the exception of cells marked §

  20. Effect of in-service on pupils • Pupils attitudes to school did not deteriorate over year • Boys and girls liked more independent practical work   • Enthusiasm for science still falls for both boys & girls • – This could be the expected decline. •  Link between enthusiasm and difficultly disappears   • Pupils’ overall mean cognitive score showed highly • significant increases which were not matched in a • control sample of 77 pupils • Overall positive cognitive and attitudinal effects mask great class variation.

  21. Disaffected teachers (5) Years 2 & 3 • Modest cognitive & confidence gains from • low base • Drop in attitudes to investigative science & • theory • Absences / little work in classroom • Significant fall in pupils’ attitudes • Cognitive rise in Year 3

  22. Limited cognitive development (13) Years 3-6 • Significant cognitive gains from a low base • Gains in confidence & competency from • average base • Good course attendance / limited classroom • follow-up • Pupils’ attitudes rise from a significantly low base • Pupils’ cognitive gains below average

  23. Enthusiastically fired (5) Years 4 & 5 • Cognitive gains from a high level • Sharp rise in attitudes, confidence & • competency • Mainly whole school follow up • No significant change in pupils’ attitudes • Pupils’ cognitive gains around average

  24. Unaffected professionals (9) Y6 • Minor change from a high cognitive base • Little change in attitudes, confidence & • competency • Class and whole school follow up • No significant change in pupils’ science attitudes • Cognitive gains above average

  25. What does this mean for in-service? • At least two main types of teacher in-service depending teachers’ initial level of cognition and confidence are needed. • Short courses for teachers with a high cognitive base, and • Long-term in-service with school support for classroom-based work for teachers with initial low attainment.

  26. Short courses • To retain teachers by keeping & extending their • interest in science teaching. • Innovative pedagogical strategies to enthuse more of • the unaffected professionals. Substantial courses • Over 8 days contact with opportunity to revisit • persistent misconceptions. • Self-confidence needs addressing. • School support for classroom-based work. • Focus for early years teaching showing value of • science for early years’ children & showing science • integrated with other subjects.

  27. The challenge • To provide what research says is effective in-service to • Schools and headteachers who • Are not aware of the value of sustained in-service, • Have limited funds with many demands on their • funds. • Primary teachers who • Have to be experts in many subjects • Are already overworked and probably not • appreciated enough.

  28. Courses at Regional Science Learning Centre: East Midlands • 2004/05 Courses of 5 or 7 days with links to tutor support and accreditation towards a University Certificate as well as 1 day courses. • Despite substantial reduction in fees, teachers / schools did not choose to come on the long courses. They did attend the one day courses. • We are now offering Mix and Match courses. • Eg Teachers can choose 1- 4 sessions from • Assessment • Healthy Eating • Rocks & Soils • Plants

  29. Substantial bespoke courses • Focused help for four Year 5 and 6 teachers in one school who have problems providing practical investigations in their classroom. The Centre has provided individual tutorials with the teachers and two very focused 2 hour workshops. This has been extended next year to four Year 1 & 2 teachers as well as continuing with the Year 5 & 6 teachers. (2-3 year project) • Secondary school and its 9 feeder primary schools. Secondary school is giving money and equipment to the primary schools. The Centre is providing workshops for all the teachers at each school and some joint workshops at the secondary school for teachers teaching the 11 year old pupils.

  30. Early years & cross curricular • Science through discovery & play • Cross curricular science • Creativity in science Other courses • Science for Recently Qualified • Primary teachers • Quality in primary investigations • ICT Key Stage 1 & 2

  31. For more information… • emslc@le.ac.uk • 0116 252 3771 • www.sciencelearningcentres.org.uk/em

  32. T. Jarvis & A. Pell (2002) The effect of the Challenger experience on elementary children’s attitudes to science Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(10) 979-1000. • T. Jarvis & A. Pell (2002) Changes in primary boys’ and girls’ attitudes to school and science during a two-year science in-service programme The Curriculum Journal 13(1) 43-69. • T. Jarvis, A. Pell, F. McKeon (2003) Changes in primary teachers’ science knowledge and understanding during a two year in-service programme Research in Science & Technological Education 21(1) 17-42 • T. Jarvis and A. Pell (2004) Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two year science in-service programme and their effect on pupils International Journal of Science Education26(14) 1787-1811 • T. Jarvis and A. Pell (2005) Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes to science before, during and following a visit to the UK National Space Centre Journal Research in Science Teaching 42(1), 53-83

More Related