Pattern recognition l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 38

Pattern Recognition PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Pattern Recognition. Pattern - complex composition of sensory stimuli that the human observer may recognize as being a member of a class of objects Issue - what cognitive mechanisms need to be inferred to describe this process of recognition?. Bridge with Signal Detection.

Download Presentation

Pattern Recognition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Pattern recognition l.jpg

Pattern Recognition

Pattern - complex composition of sensory stimuli that the human observer may recognize as being a member of a class of objects

Issue - what cognitive mechanisms need to be inferred to describe this process of recognition?


Bridge with signal detection l.jpg

Bridge with Signal Detection

  • Detection of sensory stimuli - data driven

  • Perception of Patterns - conceptually driven

  • work from the bottom (identifying stuff in the world) to the top (thinking)


Necessary terms and concepts of pattern recognition l.jpg

Necessary Terms and Concepts of Pattern Recognition

  • Serial and Parallel Processing

    • Serial or sequential processing means we process information one step at a time, where one process must be finished before the next can be started.

    • Parallel processing means we can process several tasks at one time


Necessary terms and concepts of pattern recognition4 l.jpg

Necessary Terms and Concepts of Pattern Recognition

  • Bottom-up and Top-down processing

    • Bottom-up processing is similar to inductive reasoning. Basic data are combined into more complex forms.

    • Top-down processing is similar to deductive reasoning. Higher levels of processing affect lower level tasks.

      • The following gives examples of how we perceive visual patterns and how positioning or additional information affects our perception.


Theories of perception l.jpg

Theories of Perception

1. Gestalt

(Canonic Processing)2. Bottom-Up vs. Top Down

3. Template matching

4. Feature Analysis

Prototype Theory

Form Perception


Gestalt theory l.jpg

Gestalt Theory

  • Gestalt theorists are among the earliest to look at the problem of pattern recognition.

  • They postulate that we perceive stimuli as a whole pattern. That is, that individual parts have no meaning independent of the whole but combine to revel an identifiable pattern.

  • Gestalt theorists developed 5 rules of perception to explain their ideas...


Gestalt laws l.jpg

Gestalt Laws

1. Law of Proximity:

  • Elements that are closer together will be perceived as a coherent object.

  • On the top, there appears to be three horizontal rows, while on the bottom, the grouping appears to be columns


Gestalt laws10 l.jpg

Gestalt Laws

  • Law of Similarity:

    • Elements that look similar will be perceived as part of the same form.

    • There seems to be a triangle in the square.


Gestalt laws11 l.jpg

Gestalt Laws

  • Law of Closure:

    • Humans tend to enclose a space by completing a contour and ignoring gaps in the figure


Gestalt laws12 l.jpg

Gestalt Laws

  • Law of Prananz:

    • A stimulus will be organized into as good a figure as possible (symmetrical, simple, and regular)

    • The figure appears to the eye as a square overlapping triangle, not a combination of several complicated shapes.


Summary of gestalt l.jpg

Summary of Gestalt

  • Modern conclusion is that some level of “natural organization” of patterns is tied to the perceptual history of the subject

    • a function of the perceiver rather than the stimulus


Canonic processing l.jpg

Canonic Processing

  • Extension of Gestalt

  • the first images of an object that comes to mind when thinking of that particular form.

  • perspectives fluctuate with culture and time.

    • person from Los Angeles asked to think of a house might recall a one story, 3 bedroom stucco structure; a person living in a poverty-stricken Third world country might imagine a small hut made of tree branches held together with mud


Canonic processing19 l.jpg

Canonic Processing

  • Through common experience with objects, we develop memories of the most representational view (and gives most amount of info)

  • Studying this helps to understand form perception, prototype formation, economy of thinking, “visual shorthand”


Top down vs bottom up processing l.jpg

Top-down vs. bottom up processing

  • Bottom-up processing consists of mental operations influenced by the physical properties of the stimulus.

  • Top-down processing consists of mental operations influenced by the results of processes already completed.

  • Reading the following requires both kinds of processing:


Reminder l.jpg

Reminder...

  • Problem - perception requires that information in the environment must be matched to internal information about the environment; however, the environmental information is subject to substantial variation. How do we recognize things in the face of this variability?


Template matching l.jpg

Template Matching

  • Template - internal constrict that, when matched by sensory stimuli, leads to the recognition of an object

  • Assumption: a retinal image of an object is faithfully transmitted to the brain and that an attempt is made to compare it directly to various stored patterns

  • details are vague


Template matching25 l.jpg

Template Matching

  • compare stimulus to large number of literal copies (templates) that are stored in memory to find match against all templates

    • works well with computers (check-sorting machines)

    • does not work well with humans -- too inflexible

      • does not account for similarities among objects

      • what is the effect of context?


Prototype model l.jpg

Prototype Model

  • more flexible version of template model - the match does not have to be exact

    • match against “prototypical A”

  • advantages

    • manageable number of representations in memory can account for how people classify similar objects into a common category

  • disadvantages

    • lack of explicit information about how stimuli are compared to prototypes


Feature analysis model l.jpg

Feature Analysis Model

  • Assumption: stimuli consist of combinations of elementary features; (e.g for the alphabet, features may include horizontal lines, vertical lines, diagonals, and curves)

    • make discriminations based on a small number of characteristics of stimuli

    • distinctive feature components stored in memory [a mini-template model??]


Feature analysis model28 l.jpg

Feature Analysis Model

  • What is a feature?

    • A feature is a distinctive attribute or characteristic of a stimulus.

      e.g., 'T' has 2 features: ' - ' & '|'

      (E. Gibson, 1969)


Feature analysis model31 l.jpg

Feature Analysis Model

  • Psychological Evidence: Gibson (1969)

  • decide whether or not two letters are different

    • takes longer to respond to P & R versus G & M

  • P & R share many critical features


Feature analysis model32 l.jpg

Feature Analysis Model

  • Neurological Evidence: Hubel & Wiesel (1962)

    • microelectrodes in cats’ brains (visual cortex)

    • some neurons respond only to horizontal lines, others to diagonals...

    • similar evidence in monkeys (Maunsell & Newsome, 1987)

  • certain feature detectors are “wired” and help us identify features and simple patterns


Neisser example l.jpg

Neisser example

  • - Look for the “X”

    O O P O P O P O P

    P O P P O P P P O

    O O P P O X P O P

    O O P O P O P O P

    P O P P O P P P O


Neisser example34 l.jpg

Neisser example

  • Look for the “X”

    N N Z N Z N Z N Z

    Z N Z Z N Z Z N N

    N N N Z N X N Z N

    N N Z N Z N Z N Z

    Z N Z Z N Z Z N N


Feature analysis l.jpg

Feature Analysis

  • advantages

    • economical to store features in memory

    • experimental evidence consistent with features

  • disadvantages

    • lack of applicability to a wide range of stimuli

    • analysis of stimuli does not always begin with features

    • treats all features as equivalent


Back to gestalt l.jpg

Back to Gestalt...


Back to gestalt37 l.jpg

Back to Gestalt...


Back to gestalt38 l.jpg

Back to Gestalt...


  • Login