1 / 23

Individual Nameplate Inspector

May03-07. Client: Metalcraft Advisors: Dr. John Lamont Professor Ralph E. Patterson, III Team: Dejan Leginovic Paul Slifka Kevin James Ben Weatherman Jacob Powell Travis Johnson. Individual Nameplate Inspector. February 13, 2003. Agenda.

ashive
Download Presentation

Individual Nameplate Inspector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. May03-07 Client: Metalcraft Advisors: Dr. John Lamont Professor Ralph E. Patterson, III Team: Dejan Leginovic Paul Slifka Kevin James Ben Weatherman Jacob Powell Travis Johnson Individual Nameplate Inspector February 13, 2003

  2. Agenda • What is the Individual Nameplate Inspector project all about? • What are the requirements for the project? • How did we solve the problem? • Where does the project stand now?

  3. What is a Nameplate? • Rectangular piece of aluminum • Attached to something for identification • Largest is 3” x 5” • Smallest is ½” x 1” • All about 1/20” thick • Attached with adhesive or screws

  4. What is a Nameplate?

  5. Problem • “Singulate” stack of plates • Adhesive makes this difficult • Take a picture of each plate • Identify errors (if any) • List all bad nameplates

  6. Solution • Break the problem into 2 systems: • Transport System moves the plates around • Vision System checks quality of plates

  7. Operating Environment • No unusual constraints • Light awareness

  8. Intended Users and Uses • Individual Nameplate Inspector will be used by the employees of Metalcraft to verify that the nameplates they manufacture are error free

  9. Assumptions/Limitations • Users are familiar with a PC • Cleaning the system as much as once per day is acceptable • The system will not be moved frequently • Max cycle time is 2 seconds • Inspector will not be able to accommodate every label

  10. Risks and Management • Meeting times do not work for everyone • Separate project into parts • Schedule far in advance • Transport and Vision system do not work together • Keep both in mind during design • Accidentally e-mailing client through provided mailing list

  11. Deliverables • Complete system • Manual explaining setup of transport system • Manual explaining setup of vision system

  12. Research • Talking to client about what has and has not worked in the past • Other vision systems • Looking at systems that do similar work

  13. Considered Approach #1

  14. Considered Approach #2

  15. Are We Almost Done? • Research – 98% • Design – 80% • Implementation – 25% • Testing – 50%

  16. Financial Requirements

  17. Personnel Requirements

  18. Project Schedule

  19. Project Eval • On track for completion • Need to start making final system from prototypes

  20. Future Work • Marking or removal of bad plates • Automate machine setup

  21. Lessons Learned • Good to have several plans • Plagiarize others work when possible • More client meetings are helpful

  22. Acknowledgement • National Instruments • Metalcraft

  23. Questions?

More Related