Joint exchange interop work group test workgroup
Download
1 / 18

Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 121 Views
  • Uploaded on

Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup. John Donnelly /Judith Huntman /Joe Lamy. Aug 15, 2012. Roll. Agenda. Roll Call – Cayla Announcements – Eric Review of Phases – Judith (10 mins ) Vote on Harmonized Phase I Test Cases – John (10 mins )

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup' - asasia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Joint exchange interop work group test workgroup

Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup

John Donnelly/Judith Huntman/Joe Lamy

Aug 15, 2012



Agenda
Agenda

  • Roll Call – Cayla

  • Announcements – Eric

  • Review of Phases – Judith (10 mins)

  • Vote on Harmonized Phase I Test Cases – John (10 mins)

  • Execution of Test Cases – Judith/Joe (10 mins)

  • Test Case Metrics – Judith/Joe (7 mins)

  • Open Discussion – All

  • Wrap Up - John

  • Schedule Review - John


Announcements
Announcements

  • Harmonized PD/QD/RD/MP/AF (aka Patient Record Lookup) Tests Are Ready for Vote!

    • Future changes are possible, but will be incorporated into the next phase of test cases design and implementation (post Oct 2012)

  • RFP

    • Has 5 respondents

    • Contracting is expected to begin this week


Harmonization phases
Harmonization Phases

Unified Test Process – Has Been Proposed


Vote on harmonized artifacts
Vote on Harmonized Artifacts

  • PD, QD, RD, Messaging & Auth (Phase I)

  • Vote to ratify this workgroups decision that the current written test cases for PD, QD, RD, MP, AF (aka Patient Record Lookup) are in “final” status

  • ‘round-the-room vote:

    • Approve

    • Abstain – with reason stated

    • Do not approve

  • Artifacts may be found at: http://exchange-iwg.wikispaces.com/Test+Artifacts+Harmonization





Direct harmonization deployment models
Direct Harmonization: Deployment Models

  • Deployment models:

    • EHR-HIE Test Spec identifies actors: assumes specific deployment models

    • ONC Test package: agnostic

    • Direct Project specifications do not specify a model

  • Issues:

    • Specifying a deployment model may restrict testing or add requirements outside the scope of the specs

  • Solution:

    • Present EHR-HIE Test Spec deployment models and actors as examples of implementation models

    • Map EHR-HIE Test Spec deployment models to our use cases

    • Show the outliers (what they are testing that is not in our scope)


Harmonization modular approach pd qd rd
Harmonization: Modular Approach (PD-QD-RD)

End User Auth

PD

QD

RD

Messaging & Auth

Message Render

TC1

MR1

MR2

TC2

TC1

TC2

PD1

PD2

QD1

QD2

RD1

RD2

TC3

PD3

QD3

MR3

TC3

RD3

Event-Based Interop Testing

EHR-HIE ApplicantProduction Participant

TC1

MR1

TC1

TC2

PD1

QD1

MR2

RD2

PD2

TC2

TC3

MR3


Harmonization modular approach direct
Harmonization: Modular Approach (Direct)

End User Auth

Direct Messaging

Cert Discovery

Deplmnt B Reqts

Deplmnt A Reqts

Message Render

Deplmnt X Reqts

X1

MR1

A1

B1

MR2

B2

X2

A2

TC1

TC2

DM1

DM2

CD1

CD2

TC3

DM3

CD3

B3

X3

MR3

A3

Event-Based Interop Testing

EHR-HIE ApplicantProduction Participant

A1

MR1

TC1

TC2

DM1

CD1

MR2

DM2

CD3

A2

TC3

MR3

DM3

CD2

A3


Automating test case execution
Automating Test Case Execution

Messaging & Auth

  • Modular: New scripts for each web service

  • Some test cases implicitly covered by test cases in core specs

  • Testing invalid SAML assertions

    • Critical to exchange security

    • Probably can’t be executed using CONNECT as test tool


Automating test case execution1
Automating Test Case Execution

Direct

  • NIST: Direct messaging tool in development

  • ONC Test: Prototype Direct Cert Discovery tool

  • September 2012: Incorporated into NIST/ONC-Cert MU2 Test Procedures


Automating test case execution soapui scripts complete
Automating Test Case Execution: soapUI scripts complete


Round the room
‘round-the-room

What risks or other concerns do you have at this point in the process related to the harmonized test cases or automation approach?



Schedule review
Schedule Review

  • RFP released — July 2nd 

  • Questions received by 6 organizations

  • Answers distributed — July 13th

  • Bids due — July 20th

  • Expected award — August 15th

  • Contract start — TBD

We are here


ad