Sacs accreditation process l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 9

SACS Accreditation Process PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 68 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

SACS Accreditation Process. Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President Commission on Colleges---SACS. History of Accreditation. Based on philosophy that “a free people can and ought to govern themselves through a representative, flexible, and responsive system.”. Purpose of Accreditation.

Download Presentation

SACS Accreditation Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Sacs accreditation process l.jpg

SACS Accreditation Process

Presented by

Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President

Commission on Colleges---SACS


History of accreditation l.jpg

History of Accreditation

  • Based on philosophy that “a free people can and ought to govern themselves through a representative, flexible, and responsive system.”


Purpose of accreditation l.jpg

Purpose of Accreditation

  • Signifies that “an institution has a purpose appropriate to higher education and has resources, programs, and services sufficient to accomplish and sustain that purpose.”

  • Indicates that an institution maintains clearly specified educational objectives that are consistent with its mission and appropriate to the degrees it offers, and that it is successful in achieving its stated objectives.”


Principles of accreditation l.jpg

Principles of Accreditation

  • Integrity—honest and open

  • Thoughtful and principled judgment

  • Rigorous application of requirements

  • Context of Trust

  • Voluntary participation

  • Self-regulatory process (peer review)


Process l.jpg

Process

  • Provides an assessment of an institution’s effectiveness in the fulfillment of its mission, its compliance with the requirements of its accrediting association, and its continuing efforts to enhance the quality of student learning and its programs and services

  • Stimulates evaluation and improvement

  • Provides continuing accountability to the public


Assessing quality of degree programs l.jpg

ASSESSING QUALITY OF DEGREE PROGRAMS

  • Length – CR2.7.1

  • Rigor (collegiate level) – CS3.4.4

  • General education broadly based – CR2.7.3

  • Coherence – CR2.7.1

  • Faculty qualifications – CS3.7.1/3.5.4 and Policy on Transfer…

  • Transfer-in credits comparable – CS3.4.4

  • Compatibility with mission – CR2.7.1


Measuring student learning outcomes cs3 3 1 l.jpg

MEASURING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES CS3.3.1

  • Quality of stated program outcomes:

    • Clearly stated and measurable

    • Include learning outcomes (not just process/productivity outcomes)

  • Quality of assessment strategy:

    • Include multiple measures: (internal/external; quantitative/qualitative; direct/indirect; authentic/standardized)


Measuring student learning outcomes cont l.jpg

Quality of having used assessment results for improvement:

Alignment among assessment results, strategy for improvement, and outcomes

What was learned from this process that may be further used to make improvements.

MEASURING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (cont)


S tudents a re c entral to s uccess l.jpg

Students Are Central to Success

Belle S. Wheelan, Ph.D.

[email protected]

404.679.4512


  • Login