Update on the new kansas accreditation model the 5 rs
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 32

Update on the New Kansas Accreditation Model – The 5 Rs PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 166 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Update on the New Kansas Accreditation Model – The 5 Rs. AdvancED Conference October 10, 2013 1:15 – 2:30 p.m. Salon 1 Scott Myers, Vicki Seeger KSDE. Accreditation . Defining the 5 Rs – Fifth R.

Download Presentation

Update on the New Kansas Accreditation Model – The 5 Rs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Update on the new kansas accreditation model the 5 rs

Update on the New Kansas Accreditation Model – The 5 Rs

AdvancED Conference

October 10, 2013

1:15 – 2:30 p.m.

Salon 1

Scott Myers, Vicki Seeger

KSDE


Defining the 5 rs fifth r

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs – Fifth R

“Focusing on results—witnessable evidence of growth and learning—allows curriculum and instruction to be delivered in a timely fashion based on the needs and desires of the individual learner. Informative and summative assessment, coupled with research-based effective teaching practices, can provide the data and information necessary to fuel teaching and empower learning (KSDE, 2010, p. 46).”


Annual measurable objectives amos

Accreditation

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

The Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) as outlined in the ESEA Waiver (2012), established the following measures:

  • high achievement data using the Assessment Performance Index;

  • growth in student achievement using the Student Growth Percentile Model;

  • reduced gaps in achievement using the Assessment Performance Index;

  • proficiency using a Reduction in the Non-proficient Performance levels;

  • participation rate in state assessments; and

  • graduation rates.

    The goal for every district in the State of Kansas is to achieve 21st Century accreditation and for all students to be college and career ready upon graduation from a Kansas high school.


What are the 6 amos

Annual Measurable Objectives

What are the 6 AMOs?

  • Each building will have an AMO for achievement, growth, reduction of non-proficient, gap and participation

  • High school buildings will have an AMO for graduation

  • All targets are based on 2011-2012 data


Update on the new kansas accreditation model the 5 rs

Accreditation

As we think about accreditation, we need to keep in mind the definition of Kansas College and Career Ready:

College and Career Ready means an individual has the academic preparation, cognitive preparation, technical skills, and employability skills to be successful in postsecondary education, in the attainment of an industry recognized certification or in the workforce, without the need for remediation.


Current objectives

Accreditation

Current Objectives

Updates have been made to:

  • In Depth Rubric Revisions

  • Definitions of Relationships, Relevance, Responsive Culture, Rigor, Results

  • Definitions of the sub-R’s

  • QPA Protocol Handbook

  • Evidence

  • Web Page

  • QPA Regulations


District accreditation cycle interim year

Accreditation

District Accreditation Cycle: Interim Year

Foundational Elements:

  • Licensed Educators

  • KAR 91-31-34

  • State Law

  • Local Graduation Policies

  • School Improvement Plan

  • Secondary Programs and Services

  • External Assistance Team

  • Curricula

  • Programs and Services

    Performance Elements:

  • Yes on Achievement, Growth, or Gap

  • 95% of students are tested

  • Graduation Rate

  • Attendance Rate


District accreditation cycle year one

Accreditation

District Accreditation Cycle: Year One

  • 5Rs Rubrics are completed by the districts

  • Evidence submitted to repository to support ratings on the 5Rs rubrics completed by the district

    • Documents or reports currently submitted to KSDE

    • Evidence the district already has in place

    • New evidence artifacts will be minimal

  • KSDE and External Team Review

  • Set two change goals from the sub-R categories based on the results of the 5Rs rubrics


District accreditation cycle year two

Accreditation

District Accreditation Cycle: Year Two

  • Implementation of strategies for Change Goal #1

  • Implementation of strategies for Change Goal #2

  • Data collection on goals #1 and #2


District accreditation cycle year three

Accreditation

District Accreditation Cycle: Year Three

  • Initial Data Analysis of Change Goals #1 and #2

  • Continued Implementation of Change Goals

  • Adjustment to strategies if warranted

  • Continued data collection

  • Continued analysis of results


District accreditation model year four

Accreditation

District Accreditation Model: Year Four

  • Final year of implementation of change goals and strategies

  • Final data analysis in Spring


Defining the 5 rs through the rubrics

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs through the Rubrics


Defining the 5 rs first r

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs – First R

  • Relationships—a state of interconnectedness among people, curricula, programs, projects, and communities—are critical in establishing connections that result in high performing learning environments (KSDE, 2010, p. 40).”


Examining the relationships rubric

Accreditation

Examining the Relationships Rubric

  • With a partner, take 5 minutes to skim the Relationships rubric.

  • How does the criteria for each of the sub Rs carry out the intent of the definition for Kansas College and Career Ready?

  • What parts of the rubric are a strength for your district?

  • What parts of the rubric might need to be strengthened for your district?


Evidence for relationships

Accreditation

Evidence for Relationships

Completion of all areas of the Relationships Rubric as a needs assessment for the district

Demonstration of Staff

  • Link to district web site

  • Staff development priorities

    Demonstration of Students

  • Student information

  • Classroom web site links (sampling)

    Demonstration of Families

  • Schedules of family involvement

  • Family surveys and results

    Demonstration of Communities

  • Site Councils documentation (membership and minutes sampling)


Defining the 5 rs second r

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs – Second R

  • “Relevance—the power and ability of specific information to meet the needs of its user—strengthens learner motivation and allows learning to become more engaging, empowering, connected, applicable to the real-world, and socially significant (KSDE, 2010, p. 42).”


Examining the relevance rubric

Accreditation

Examining the Relevance Rubric

  • With a partner, take 5 minutes to skim the Relelvance rubric.

  • How does the criteria for each of the sub Rs carry out the intent of the definition for Kansas College and Career Ready?

  • How would your district fare for each subR?

  • Where will your district need the most professional learning?


Evidence for relevance

Accreditation

Evidence for Relevance

Completion of all areas of the Relevance Rubric as a needs assessment for the district

Demonstration of Curriculum

  • Curriculum maps

  • District curriculum guides

    Demonstration of Instruction

  • Summary data from evaluations

    Demonstration of Student Engagement

  • Student goal planning (sampling)

    Demonstration of Technology

  • District Technology Plan


Defining the 5 rs third r

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs – Third R

  • “A responsive culture—one that readily reacts to suggestions, influences, appeals, efforts, or opportunities—empowers all stakeholders to become respectful of, responsible for, and involved in learning, the learning process, and the learning community (KSDE,2010, p. 48).”


Examining the responsive culture rubric

Accreditation

Examining the Responsive Culture Rubric

  • With a partner, take 5 minutes to skim the Responsive Culture rubric.

  • How does the criteria for each of the sub Rs carry out the intent of the definition for Kansas College and Career Ready?

  • What kind of professional learning would your district need to provide for elements of this rubric?

  • How could a district capture school individual school identities through the District Climate subR?


Evidence for responsive culture

Accreditation

Evidence for Responsive Culture

Completion of all areas of the Responsive Culture Rubric as a needs assessment for the district

Demonstration of Leadership

  • District vision and mission statements

  • District strategic plan

  • District budget

  • District improvement plan

  • Links to Board members and Board policies

    Demonstration of Early Childhood

  • Kansas pre-K Program

  • Head Start data

    Demonstration of District Climate

  • Student data and reports

  • Stakeholder surveys and results

  • Bullying data

  • MTSS plan

  • KLN Effectiveness and Efficiency Reports

    Demonstration of Nutrition and Wellness

  • School Nutrition Reports

  • Wellness Committee(s) and policies

  • Nutrition-related surveys and results


Defining the 5 rs fourth r

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs – Fourth R

  • Rigor—a relentless pursuit of that which challenges and provides opportunity to demonstrate growth and learning—is essential is addressing the needs of our rapidly expanding society and world (KSDE, 2010, p. 44).”


Examining the rigor rubric

Accreditation

Examining the Rigor Rubric

  • With a partner, take 5 minutes to skim the Rigor rubric.

  • How does the criteria for each of the sub Rs carry out the intent of the definition for Kansas College and Career Ready?

  • How would you score your district for rigor at this point in time?

  • How can classroom teachers influence what happens in a district related criteria for each subR in Rigor?


Evidence for rigor

Accreditation

Evidence for Rigor

  • Completion of all areas of the Rigor Rubric as a needs assessment for the district

  • Demonstration of Career and Technical Education

    • Approved pathways and competencies for CTE

  • Demonstration of Professional Learning

    • District Professional Learning Plan

    • School calendar with outline of professional learning for academic year

  • Demonstration of Resources

    • District Audit Report

  • Demonstration of Data

    • MTSS structure

    • Student information


Defining the 5 rs fifth r1

Accreditation

Defining the 5 Rs – Fifth R

  • “Focusing on results—witnessable evidence of growth and learning—allows curriculum and instruction to be delivered in a timely fashion based on the needs and desires of the individual learner. Informative and summative assessment, coupled with research-based effective teaching practices, can provide the data and information necessary to fuel teaching and empower learning (KSDE, 2010, p. 46).”


Achieving accreditation

Accreditation

Achieving Accreditation

  • Accredited: Carrying out the implementation with fidelity, collecting and analyzing the data, reflecting and reporting on the results, and identifying next steps

  • Accredited with Support: Failing to complete all steps within the four‐year cycle

    • results in regular conferencing with KSDE staff, quarterly reporting of progress in the next accreditation cycle, and annual completion of the 5 Rs rubrics.

  • Not Accredited: Failing to complete all steps and reporting information for multiple years despite support from KSDE


Reporting districts

Accreditation

Reporting Districts


Setting district goals

Accreditation

Setting District Goals

Families

  • The district chooses to set a goal targeting relationships with families and engagement at the building level.

    District Climate

  • The district chooses to set a goal to survey all stakeholders in the community to assess perceived culture and climate.


Update on the new kansas accreditation model the 5 rs

Accreditation

Accreditation Professional Learning Modules

http://goanimate.com/quickvideo/edit/03qV64mSn9HE


Resources

Annual Measurable Objectives

Resources

  • Video clips and fact sheets for Achievement, Growth, Reduction of Non-Proficient and Gap AMOs can be found on the ESEA flexibility waiver webpage:http://www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=5075

  • This page can also be accessed by clicking this logo on the KSDE home page


Questions recorded

Accreditation

Questions Recorded


Questions

Questions ??

Contacts:

Scott Myers,

Director

Teacher Licensure and Accreditation

[email protected]

Vicki Seeger,

Education Program Consultant

Teacher Licensure and Accreditation

[email protected]

An Equal Employment/Educational Opportunity Agency

The Kansas State Department of Education does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies:

KSDE General Counsel, 120 SE 10th Ave., Topeka, KS 66612; 785-296-3201


  • Login