1 / 15

THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW

C. ADMISSION TO PRACTICE. Primarily, qualifications for admission Procedure in Missouri: SCt Rule 8 admin by Bd of Law Examiners application for C&F report and for BE take BE and MPRE if adm denied, hearing BLE, appeal SCt. THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW .

arnie
Download Presentation

THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. C. ADMISSION TO PRACTICE • Primarily, qualifications for admission • Procedure in Missouri: SCt Rule 8 • admin by Bd of Law Examiners • application for C&F report and for BE • take BE and MPRE • if adm denied, hearing BLE, appeal SCt THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW

  2. MO Formal Requirements (R8.03) • admission by examination • US citizen/national, permanent res., green card • JD ABA approved LS, or • adm in other US jur. + active practice 3 of last 5 yrs • adm in other US jur. + active status + 24 hrs. ABA approved LS w/n last 3 yrs • law degree from foreign jur. + adm to practice there + • active practice 3 of last 5 yrs or • good standing + 24 hrs ABA approved LS w/n last 3 yrs

  3. Missouri Requirements c’t’d • Without examination (r. 8.10) • for 5 of last 10 years have been: • adm in other US jur which permits reciprocity + active practice, or • full-time service as lawyer in US gov or armed services, or • full time teaching in ABA approved LS • full-time practice as house counsel from office in other US jur.

  4. Character and Fitness • Problem p. 62: any of three situations grounds for denying admission? • what is the standard for C&F? • MUSTAFA, p. 62: “good moral character and general fitness to practice law” • the Rules? (none explicitly stated in MO) • federal constitution? (Schware, n.1 p. 65) – due process! “rational connection with fitness or capacity to practice law” • who bears burden of proof?

  5. Problem p. 62 c’t’d • The football game incident • denial of admission? “rational connection with fitness to practice?” • if not, duty to report? Depends on questions on application form? • MO Rule 8.04: found guilty of felony under law of any U.S. jur., ineligible for admission for 5 years after full resolution • n. 2 p. 65 out of date!

  6. Problem p. 62 c’t’d • the plagiarism incident • “rationally connected”? • what more do you need to know? • activities with “Friends Opposed to Europeans” • “rationally connected”? • First Amendment protection? • Baird v. State Bar, n. 4 p. 66 • Matthew Hale’s case, nn. 5-8 pp 66-68

  7. D. THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW 1. Generally • What is the “practice of law”? Mo.Rev.Stat. s. 484.010: two dimensions • “practice of the law” : appearance as an advocate or drawing of papers, pleadings, etc., in a representative capacity in conjunction with any proceedings before a court or other body having authority to settle controversies • “law business”: for a valuable consideration, advising or counseling as to secular law, drawing any document affecting secular rights, any act in a representative capacity tending to obtain or secure any property rights

  8. Problem pp. 69-70: activities of a paralegal • selling “divorce kits” with printed instructions for preparing documents • does Grant give individualized advice to buyers about what docs to use or how to fill them out? If so, “legal skill or knowledge” is required, Grant is unauthorized • only general advice? If so, no UAP in most jurs.

  9. Problem p. 69 c’t’d • selling “Living Trust Kits” as seminars at which a lawyer is featured speaker • Lawyer discusses associated legal problems • Grant will sell the kits and help the buyers gather the data and fill out the forms • individualized legal advice? • direct supervision of attorney?

  10. Problem p. 69 c’t’d • Selling lawyer-prepared eviction forms to landlords who fill them out to initiate court proceedings – any problem? • Appearing before the court for the landlord to assert the eviction claim, on the basis of a “power of attorney” executed by the latter – can the power of attorney do that?

  11. Problem p. 69 c’t’d: responsibility of attorney • MRPC 5.5(a): lawyer shall not assist another in the unauthorized practice of law • Angela at the seminars: if Grant is engaged in UAP, is Angela assisting him in doing so? • is knowledge of what Grant will do required? • Angela preparing eviction forms for Grant to sell: improper assistance here?

  12. Pro Se Representation, n. 6 p. 76 • Could Grant’s landlords appear in eviction proceedings without a lawyer? • If the landlord is a corporation or a partnership, can one of its officers or partners appear on behalf of the entity without a lawyer?

  13. D(2): MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE • lawyer admitted in one jurisdiction, who wants to provide legal services in another • default position: you need a license there • Birbrower (Cal. 1998), seeNajam, J., in CONK p. 80-1, and n. 1 p. 82: if your services in another jur. are UAP there, you can’t recover fees there • CONK, p. 78: how is this different from Birbrower? • what is the issue? • how did the contacts differ, if at all?

  14. Problem p. 77 • facts inspired by Birbrower • any differences? • how about the fact that the Birbrower firm’s activities in California were related to a pending arbitration proceeding? • MRPC 5.5(c): post-Birbrower amendment! • provided on temporary basis • arise out of or reasonably related to practice in jurisdiction where lawyer is admitted

  15. Special admissions • Admission pro hac vice • authorized representation in court • inherent power of individual court, subject to regulate • Special admission for house counsel • MRPC 5.5(d) – general permission • MO S.Ct. Rule 8.105 requires application, includes forensic services

More Related