1 / 18

A Phantom for use in an MR Imager

A Phantom for use in an MR Imager. BME 400 October 14, 2005. Team Members: Missy Haehn (Team Leader) Can Pi (BSAC) Ben Sprague (Communications) Andrea Zelisko (BWIG) Advisor: Professor Kristyn Masters Client: Dr. Victor Haughton, M.D. Medical Background.

arnie
Download Presentation

A Phantom for use in an MR Imager

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Phantom for use in an MR Imager BME 400 October 14, 2005

  2. Team Members: • Missy Haehn (Team Leader) • Can Pi (BSAC) • Ben Sprague (Communications) • Andrea Zelisko (BWIG) Advisor: • Professor Kristyn Masters Client: • Dr. Victor Haughton, M.D.

  3. Medical Background • Spine consists of vertebrae and disks which act as shock cushions • Disks begin to degenerate with age due to reduced blood flow and water content • This causes disk density loss and risk for vertebrae shifting • Patients suffer from back pain, pinched nerves, muscle spasms, bone spurs

  4. MR Background • MR imaging uses magnets and radio waves to image body • T2 value is relaxation time for protons, relative to water • Can essentially pick a point in the body and ask “What type of tissue are you?” • Phantoms are used to calibrate the scanner as well as in tissue simulations

  5. Motivation • Dr. Haughton is radiologist at • UW-Hospital with a specialty in neuroradiology • Research interest in dynamic spine MR imaging • Specifically disk degeneration • Phantom needed for calibration of laboratory equipment • Mimicking intervertebral disks and T2 values

  6. Client Design Specifications • Hold artificial lumbar disk samples • Contain samples with varying distances to the spinal coil • Include solutions with known relaxation T2 times between 50 and 100 ms • Sit securely atop of the spinal coil • Is easy to use

  7. Current Progress • Current phantoms typically contain water doped solutions • have corresponding T1/T2 values • Constructed by companies such as GE, Supertech, and CIRS • Prices range from $2000 to $5000 • Not directed towards client’s specific research needs

  8. Last Semester’s Design

  9. Problems with First Design • Stair structure was large and cumbersome • Material used for structure showed up on MR image • Samples were not close enough together • exposed to varying areas of magnetic field • Disk mimicking samples separated into components over time • Not a leak-proof design

  10. Current Work: Phantom Material • Visited Standard Imaging over summer and received plastic samples • Tissue mimicking • Blue water • Virtual water • Tested samples in MR-found they show up on image and are ideal for x-ray applications • New material to use: Acrylic • Commonly used in commercial and research phantoms

  11. Current Work: Disk Samples • Need artificial disks to maintain integrity over time • Composed of water, collagen, and proteoglycans • Looking into gelatin, agarose, acrylamide, and alginates for substitutes • Tested gelatin and acrylamide in MR with good results • Need to complete testing to decide which is most cost and labor effective

  12. Current Work: Physical Design • Disk samples held close together • Has spigot for easy fill and empty • Able to hold ten samples-two in each tube • Tight seal for phantom-no leaks • Less cumbersome

  13. Potential Problems • Acrylic may show up on MR images • Artifacts from too many interfaces in phantom • Water—plastic—air—glass—sample • Fixed construction does not allow for much variety in experiments • Artificial disk samples may not mimic disks accurately • May need to construct platform so phantom is stable on the MR table/coil

  14. Future Work • Making more hydrogels to test and determining which to use • Continued testing of Gd doped water samples • Construction of phantom • Receiving quote from Acrylix.com • UW polymer processing lab • TESTING!

  15. References • Weidenbaum, M., et al. Correlating Magnetic Resonance Imaging with the Biochemical Content of the Normal Human Intervertebral disk. J. Ortho Research. 10(4): 552-61. • Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease. DynoMed. 2/12/05. http://www.dynomed.com/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/spine/Lumbar_Degenerative_Disk_Disease.html. • Blechinger, J.C., Madsen, E.L., and Frank, G.R. “Tissue-mimicking gelatin-agar gels for use in magnetic resonance imaging phantoms.” Medical Physics, Vol. 15, No. 4, Jul/Aug 1988. • Phantom Applications and Technology Overview. 2001. Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc. http:www.cirsinc.com/overview.html. • Rice, J. Robin, et all. “Anthropomorphic 1H MRS head phantom.” Medical Physics, Vol. 25, No. 7, July 1998, Part 1. • http://www.supertechx-ray.com/#MRI • http://www.cirsinc.com/productlist.html

  16. Thanks too… • Dr. Victor Haughton • John Perry • Dan Schmidt, Standard Imaging • Professor Bill Murphy • Professor Wally Block • Advisor Kristyn Masters • Ernie Madsen and Maritza Hobson, Medical Physics

  17. Questions?

More Related