career success in the early 21 st century a well researched but poorly conceptualised construct
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Career Success in the early 21 st Century: A well-researched but poorly conceptualised construct

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 31

Career Success in the early 21st Century: A well-researched but poorly conceptualised construct - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 133 Views
  • Uploaded on

Career Success in the early 21 st Century: A well-researched but poorly conceptualised construct. John Arnold and Laurie Cohen The Business School, Loughborough University, UK. Our aims.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Career Success in the early 21st Century: A well-researched but poorly conceptualised construct' - arnav


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
career success in the early 21 st century a well researched but poorly conceptualised construct

Career Success in the early 21st Century: A well-researched but poorly conceptualised construct

John Arnold and Laurie Cohen

The Business School, Loughborough University, UK

our aims
Our aims

To offer a picture of major themes and issues arising from recent research and theory on indicators and predictors of career success

To identify what we see as the key developments needed in research and theory

To pay attention to gender along the way

definitions
Definitions
  • Career: The evolving sequence of a person’s work experiences over time (Arthur, Hall & Lawrence, 1989)
  • Career Success: The accomplishment of desirable work-related outcomes at any point in a person’s work experiences over time (Arthur, Khapova, & Wilderom, 2005)
research output about career success
Research output about career success

Articles on Web of Knowledge with “career success” as a keyword:

1970s 5

1980s 37

1990s 116

2000s353

research output about career success5
Research output about career success

Articles on Web of Knowledge with “career success” and (“gender” or “women”) as keywords:

1970s 1

1980s 2

1990s 50

2000s147

objective vs subjective career success
Objective vs subjective career success

The distinction that is made all the time.

Objective Career Success (OCS): Verifiable, measureable, and directly observable attainments

Subjective Career Success (SCS): An individual’s reactions to his or her unfolding career experiences

(from Hughes, 1937; Heslin, 2005)

slide7
Earnings

Rate of earnings growth

Status

Rate of Advancement

(Lack of) involuntary unemployment

Qualifications achieved/ documented evidence of marketable skills

Bonuses/fringe benefits

Informal power/influence

Job or financial security

Career satisfaction

Job satisfaction

Balancing career and family

Being where one wants to be

Self-efficacy

Clear career identity

Sense of safety, marketability or employability

Achievement of personally meaningful goals

“Objective” v. “Subjective”

ocs and scs aren t as different as they look
OCS and SCS aren’t as different as they look
  • Contrary to what is often assumed, OCS indicators are not always easily observed
  • Some measurement and construct validity issues occur with both OCS and SCS
  • Career satisfaction is quite often measured with questions regarding satisfaction with one’s OCS – not very imaginative!
  • OCS indicators often depend on someone else’s subjective judgement e.g. whether the boss gives us a pay rise
  • They seem to influence each other: interestingly there is some evidence that the SCS→OCS link is stronger than OCS→SCS. OCS & SCS are usually correlated between .2 and .3
  • In some contexts, people’s conception of their personal development is closely aligned to their movement through organizational structures
which is more important scs or ocs
Which is more important: SCS or OCS?

OCS because it represents the tangible resources and power (and consequent health and life expectancy) that accrue to different people in society and is in limited supply. SCS is a way of keeping people happy when they have few privileges (e.g. Nicholson and De Waal Andrews, 2005)

SCS because it represents people’s freedom to drive their own career in line with their own values, and is potentially in unlimited supply. It frees them from OCS’s traditional assumptions about how to “make it” (e.g. Hall, 2002)

Key question: SCS as liberation or a resigned response to oppression?

gender and career success criteria
Gender and Career Success Criteria
  • Women experience less OCS than men.
  • Some small signs that the gap is decreasing.
  • Typically no gender difference in SCS.
  • Women value SCS criteria more highly relative to OCS criteria than men do.
  • Women and men’s success may be evaluated (by others) on different criteria
adorable women expert men kirchler 1992
Adorable women, expert men?Kirchler (1992)

Examined newspaper obituaries of 477 male and 85 female managers

Words used more Words used more

often for men than often for women than

women men

Expert Adorable

Decision-maker Faithful

Intelligent Courageous

Entrepreneurial Amiable

possible patterns of women s careers 1
Possible patterns of women’s careers (1)

Phase 1: Idealistic achievement: Emphasis on personal control, career satisfaction and achievement, and positive impact on others.

Phase 2: Pragmatic endurance:Doing what has to be done, whilst managing multiple relationships and responsibilities. Less personal control; more dissatisfaction especially with organisations and managers.

Phase 3: Re-inventive contribution:To organizations, families and communities, without losing sight of self. Careers as learning opportunities and a chance to make a difference to others.

Source: O’Neil and Bilimoria (2005)

possible patterns of women s careers 2
Possible patterns of women’s careers (2)

Mainiero and Sullivan (2005) “Kaleidoscope Careers”:

Early career: typical major concern is Challenge

Mid career: typical major concern is Balance

Late career: typical major concern is Authenticity

Gersick and Kram (2002): Remarkable match between high-achieving women’s career phases and Levinson’s theory, though some of the personal issues at each phase were a little different.

Successive tasks seemed to be:

Finding a role in life

Making career-family trade-offs

Coming into one’s own

beyond ocs vs scs as success criteria 1
Beyond OCS vs SCS as success criteria (1)
  • Other-referent vs self-referent (Heslin, 2005). Do men and women show different emphases between or within these categories?
  • Neglect of work-life balance in measures of career success (Heslin, 2005). To the extent that this is a bigger issue on average for women than for men, in what ways does the neglect distort our understanding?
  • Little consideration of career success relative to career stage/career concerns. What might success look like for women during the “pragmatic endurance” phase? Or would success be avoiding that phase altogether?
  • Lack of focus on avoiding losses (rather than making gains) and on what success might look like for people at the margins of the labour market e.g. forced migrants. A particular issue for “trailing spouses”?
slide15

Affect

Achievement

beyond ocs vs scs as success criteria 3
Beyond OCS vs SCS as success criteria (3)

What is an outcome and what is a predictor?

Arguably, in an uncertain career world we should focus more on how well people are equipped to deal with it, rather than what they achieve or how happy they are – at least in the short and medium term.

Career-related Competencies e.g. Knowing How, Knowing Why and Knowing Whom (e.g. Eby et al, 2003) – but poorly conceptualized and measured

Employability (e.g. Van der Heijden et al, 2009) Conceptualized in various ways; popular in social policy and starting to be in W & O Psychology

Career Capital (e.g. Dickmann & Doherty, 2008) Accumulated economic, social and cultural resources

more radical approaches to success criteria 1
More radical approaches to success criteria (1)

1.Career Success as being able and willing to speak the language of the employer and/or customers/clients (e.g. knowing and using “buzz words”) (Cohen et al, 2009)

Key question: conformist, or pursuing one’s own interests under the guise of representing the interests of others?

2. For people who cross national boundaries, part of career success is the ability to hold simultaneously global and local identities. Also, citizenship as an indicator of inclusion?

more radical approaches to success criteria 2
More radical approaches to success criteria (2)

3.Career Success as being able to construct narratives that satisfactorily explain one’s career to self and salient audiences (Sugarman, 2001)

Key points: emphasises “construction” rather than “reaction”; Different narratives for different audiences

Key questions: how can we define a “good” narrative, or set of narratives? How do people account for gaps between their narratives and dominant ones? Does this manifest itself differently for men and women?

is the distinction between ocs and scs useful
Is the distinction between OCS and SCS useful?

“Objective” indicators are meaningless until we attribute meaning to them

More important questions to ask might concern:

Whose interests are being served by these definitions of career success?

Is there evidence of resistance to dominant criteria? If so, from whom and why?

How do meanings of career success vary over time and space?

predictors of career success an early example
Predictors of career success - an early example

Predictor$ Salary Value

Being a graduate of a top university 31,000

Being married 28,000

Having a non-working spouse 22,000

Having a high performance rating 12,000

Each 7 years of age 10,000

Ambition (per level of hierarchy) 9,000

Being male 6,500

Working extra (one evening per week) 4,000

Based on Judge et al. (1995).

Population was US executives.

Predictors are not cumulative!

results of ng et al 2005 meta analysis
Results of Ng et al (2005) meta-analysis

Type of predictor Mean correlation with

Salary Career Sat.

Human Capitale.g. Hours worked, Work

experience, Education level, Career planning, .21 .10

Social capital

Organizational Sponsorship e.g. Career

sponsorship, Training and skill devt, .13 .31

Supervisor support

Socio-demographicse.g. Gender, White vs .20 .02

Non-white, Marital status, Age

Gender specifically .18 .01

Stable Individual Differences e.g. “Big Five”

personality, Proactivity, Locus of control, .11 .24

Cognitive ability

problems with research on predictors of career success
Problems with research on predictors of career success
  • Many classifications of variables and predictions about them are distinctly arbitrary e.g. Ng et al’s contest mobility vs sponsored mobility
  • It’s often not clear whether predictor variables are causal antecedents, statistical predictors or correlates (partly because much research is cross-sectional)
  • What career success means to the people researched, and how it is understood in the wider context researched, is rarely examined
  • There is probably some contamination between some predictors and some outcome measures, especially for SCS
  • Although there are some theories that might help to explain what leads to career success, they are not comprehensive (nor do they claim to be) and they are rarely used systematically
some interesting areas of research on predictors 1
Some interesting areas of research on predictors (1)
  • Mentoring Much research over many years. At last the demonstrated benefits are starting to catch up with the hype (e.g. Allen et al, 2004).
  • Social networks (e.g. Siebert et al, 2001). Evidence that the extent and nature of social networks is related to success. Longitudinal work is starting to appear. But network measures tend to be weak and how exactly networks affect success is still unclear, though it is somewhat theorised.
  • Career self-management (e.g. King, 2004). All the rhetoric on 21st century careers says that it is essential for success, but this is hard to demonstrate. Attention to the “dark side” of career self-management is beginning (e.g. Harris and Ogbonna, 2006).
some interesting areas of research on predictors 2
Some interesting areas of research on predictors (2)
  • The role of prior organisational affiliations and their impact on the reputation of the individual (e.g. Hamori, 2007).

2. “Most of the important rules of the workplace are unspoken. Some people learn them; others do not.” (Sternberg et al, 2000). Why is this, and what role does tacit knowledge play in career success?

1 is highly contextual; 2is highly individual (and also contextual). This shows the breadth of thinking needed.

gender as a predictor of career success 1
Gender as a predictor of career success (1)
  • Even within top management, women tend to get less attractive opportunities than men and their job moves reap fewer rewards.
  • Some evidence that personality traits are related differently to women’s vs. men’s OCS e.g. “Agreeableness”.
  • Some evidence of double or even triple jeopardy for women e.g. gender combined with age and/or ethnicity.
  • The correlations of education level and hours worked with salary are stronger for women than for men (Ng et al, 2005)
  • Career breaks (for any reason) hinder success even many years later.
gender as a predictor of career success 2
Gender as a predictor of career success (2)
  • Having a partner and family is more often positively related to success for men than for women.
  • Women feel more ambivalence about engaging in politics than men do
  • Women often have less easy access to career-enhancing social networks than men do
  • Women tend to use different, and possibly less success-enhancing, impression management techniques than men do
  • Attributions by gatekeepers of men’s and women’s motives, contributions and life preferences play a significant part in some of the findings on thjis slide and the previous one.
the social processes of career success
The social processes of career success?

Size, composition and structural properties of social networks (e.g. structural holes, loose ties)

Outcomes

Aspects of OCS

?Aspects of SCS

Access to and use of career helpers (Bosley et al, in press)

Use of political behaviour

Use of influence tactics

Social support

Gender

Decisions and perceptions of powerful others

Number and nature of developmental relationships

conclusions 1
Conclusions (1)

Criteria for assessing career success need:

  • Inclusion of process as well as outcome aspects
  • Better matching with the individual’s circumstances, priorities and cultural milieu
  • More careful attention to definition and measurement
  • Innovative development via qualitative research and verbal as well as numerical data
  • Better analysis of the meanings people attach to them, and why
conclusions 2
Conclusions (2)

Research on predictors of career success needs:

  • Careful attention to conceptual grouping of variables
  • More rigorous theorising about why predictors might matter, and testing of the theory
  • More careful attention to how social processes play a part in career success
  • More attention to gender and other “demographic” variables as moderators rather than main effects
conclusions 3
Conclusions (3)

Three general points:

  • Moves between countries (voluntary and involuntary, corporate and individual) offer rich insights into different forms of career success and how they evolve
  • Perhaps the concept of career success could be extended to collectives (e.g. families; occupations) and more links made with work on the sociology of occupations, professions
  • More use could be made of ideas from vocational psychology, such as career exploration and career-related self-efficacy
ad