- 240 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'How Should We Teach Mathematics' - armine

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

How Should We Teach Mathematics?

Dr. Eric Milou

Rowan University

Department of Mathematics

856-256-4500 x3876

Overview

- Conceptual vs. Procedural Debate
- Activities and Examples
- NJ mathematics assessments

RhetoricNY Times (5/15/06)

- In traditional math, children learn multiplication tables and specific techniques for calculating.
- In constructivist math, the process by which students explore the question can be more important than getting the right answer, and the early use of calculators is welcomed.

Motivating Factors for Change

- Society’s hate for mathematics that is prevalent and acceptable
- 4 out of 10 adults hate mathematics* (twice as many people said they hated math as said that about any other subject)
- International test scores
- Industry concerns (no problem solving skills)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards

*2005 AP-AOL News poll

Third International Math & Science Study (TIMSS)

Proceduresvs. Concepts

Lesson Study

- Demonstrates a procedure
- Assigns similar problems to students as exercises
- Homework assignment

- Presents a problem without first demonstrating how to solve it
- Individual or group problem solving
- Compare and discuss multiple solution methods
- Summary, exercises and homework assignment

What is Prevalent?

- Texts become the curriculum
- Drill oriented
- Mathematics is BORING and does not engage students
- Mathematics Phobia and Anxiety

Standards Based Approach

- Conceptual Understanding
- Contextual Problem Solving
- Constructivist Approach
- Appropriate use of Calculators & Technology

We need a BALANCE

- Traditional text with conceptual supplement
- Conceptual text (EM, CMP, Core-Plus) with computational supplement

Conceptual Understanding

- 24 ÷ 4 = 6
- 24 ÷ 3 = 8
- 24 ÷ 2 =12
- 24 ÷ 1 = 24
- 24 ÷ 1/2 = ??

Which is larger?

- 2/3 + 3/4 + 4/5 + 5/6 OR 4
- 12.5 x 45 OR 4.5 x 125
- 1/3 + 2/4 + 2/4 + 5/11 OR 2

Where’s the Point?

- 2.43 x 5.1 = 12393
- 4.85 x 4.954 = 240269
- 21.25 x 1.08 = 2295
- 1.25 x 64 = 80
- 4.688 x 1.355 = 635224
- 46.88 x 1.355 = 635224
- 4.688 x 135.5 = 635224
- 46.88 x 13.55 = 635224

Computational Balance

- 1000 ÷ 1.49
- Torture
- Big Macs Sell for $1.49, how many Big Macs can I buy for $10.00?
- 1 is $1.50
- 2 are $3
- 4 are $6
- 6 are $9

Mental Mathematics

is a vital skill

Computation is Important

- Engaging & Active
- Less passive worksheets
- Creative!
- More thinking & reasoning

Active Computation

- Fifty
- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and addition only

Contextual Problem Solving

- Not more traditional word problems
- Placing mathematical lessons into settings
- Giving students a reason to learn the skill
- Motivating students

Example

- You must select one spinner. Both spinners above will be spun once.
- The spinner with the higher number showing wins $1,000,000 for that person.
- Which spinner will you select?

Constructivist Approach

- Allow students to develop their own meanings in mathematics first, then build on those meanings.
- ENGAGE students to be active learners with hands-on cooperative learning activities

Crossing the River

- 8 adults and 2 children need to cross a river and they have one small boat only available. The boat can hold ONLY:
- One adult
- One or two children
- How many one-way trips does it take for all 8 adults and 2 children to cross?

Calculators & Technology

- Calculators allowed on 100% of GEPA & HSPA
- Calculators allowed on 90% of the points on the NJASK3 & 4
- Calculators allowed on 100% of the SAT
- BSI and Special Education should be even more strongly encouraged to use calculators

NSF funded curriculum projects

- Elementary: Everyday Math, Investigations, and Trailblazers
- Middle: Connected Math, Math-in-Context, MathThematics, & MathScapes
- High School: IMP, Core-Plus, SIMMS, Arise, & CPM

Research

- USDOE Exemplary & Promising mathematics programs (1999)
- Standards-Based School Mathematics Curricula, edited by Senk & Thompson, published by LEA (2003)

Success Factors

- Teachers (what they know, believe and do)
- Teachers Professional Development and Ongoing Support
- Administrative support
- Time on mathematics

Professional Development

- Intensive, Sustained, and Ongoing
- 60 PD hours for new curriculum
- Content knowledge focused
- Pedagogical demonstrations
- Lesson Study

2006 NJ Assessment Data

- NJASK3
- 6 non-calculator items (1/2 pt each)
- 21 MC - calculator allowed - 1 pt each
- 3 Open-ended - 3 pts each
- 14 out of 33 points is a passing score

2006 NJ Assessment Data

- NJASK4
- 8 non-calculator items (1/2 pt each)
- 24 MC - calculator allowed - 1 pt each
- 5 Open-ended - 3 pts each
- 17.5 out of 43 points is a passing score

2006 NJASK 5, 6, 7

- NJASK5 JPM was 18/39 (46%)
- NJASK 6 JPM was 17/39 (44%)
- NJASK 7 JPM was 13/39 (33%)
- 10 pts per cluster (one cluster with 9 pts)

2006 NJ Assessment Data

- GEPA
- All items allow a calculator
- 30 Multiple choice items - 1 pt each
- 6 Open-ended - 3 pts each
- 25 out of 48 points is a passing score

2006 NJ Assessment Data

- HSPA
- All items allow a calculator
- 30 Multiple choice items - 1 pt each
- 6 Open-ended - 3 pts each
- 20.5 out of 48 points is a passing score

Implications & Inferences

- NJ Assessments are rigorous and conceptual
- NJ Math Standards are well aligned with NJ assessments
- Most districts have a well aligned curriculum
- Then, what’s wrong?

Typical Questions

- What’s wrong with these kids?
- Why won’t they buckle down and get serious?
- Why aren’t they supported at home?
- Why aren’t the 1st and 2nd grade teachers preparing them?

Changing the Questions

- What will students likely take away from the activity?
- How is the mathematical idea developed?
- What is the nature of the work of students?
- What is the role of the teacher?

Characteristics of a good mathematics program

- CONCEPTUAL
- CONTEXTUAL
- CONSTUCTIVISM
- COMPUTATION
- TEST-PREP

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..