monitoring recidivism making international comparisons
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Monitoring Recidivism Making international comparisons

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

monitoring recidivism making international comparisons - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 489 Views
  • Uploaded on

Monitoring Recidivism Making international comparisons. Bouke Wartna Pompidou group Council of Europe Strasbourg, France 2009, September 11th. Nikolaj Tollenaar Martine Blom Ad Essers Inger Bregman Daphne Alberda Susan Alma Bouke Wartna. Our current team . The WODC.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' monitoring recidivism making international comparisons ' - arleen


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
monitoring recidivism making international comparisons

Monitoring Recidivism Making international comparisons

Bouke Wartna

Pompidou group

Council of Europe

Strasbourg, France

2009, September 11th

our current team
Nikolaj Tollenaar

Martine Blom

Ad Essers

Inger Bregman

Daphne Alberda

Susan Alma

Bouke Wartna

Our current team

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

the wodc
The WODC
  • International knowledge centre
  • Aims to make “a professional contribution to the development and evaluation of policy set by the Dutch Ministry of Justice”
  • About 100 fte’s; 5 divisions
  • 75% of the research is commissioned out
  • 2 divisions of in-house research
  • Mix of ad hoc and infrastructural research

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

the dutch recidivism monitor in brief
The Dutch Recidivism Monitor - in brief
  • Large scale, continuous research
  • Annual measurements of reconviction rates
  • Data from the Dutch Offenders Index (DOI)
  • Standardized procedures to measure recidivism
  • Cumulating observation periods
  • Use of event history models

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

some applications for recidivism data
Some applicationsfor recidivism data
  • Surveys and trend studies
  • Risk assessment & projections
  • Benchmarking
  • Research on the effectiveness of penal interventions

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

doi the dutch offenders index
DOIThe Dutch Offenders Index
  • Encrypted version of the JDS
  • Data on all cases handled by the procecutor’s office: 10.3 mln.cases
  • Access to data on 4 million persons
  • Complete criminal histories of 2,5 mln. persons
  • Updated every 3 months
  • Historical in nature: no removals
  • For scientific purposes only

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

the dutch definition of recidivism
The Dutch definition of ‘recidivism’
  • Based on adjudicated crime
  • Several criteria of recidivism
  • All involve reconviction for ‘crimes’ only
  • Acquittals etc. are left out
  • Sanctions by PPS are included
  • As well as cases that are undecided yet

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

slide8
Accumulated reconviction rates for adult offenders convicted in the Netherlands in 1997; by sanction type

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

analyzing the data factors associated with reconviction
Analyzing the dataFactors associated with reconviction
  • gender males represent higher risks
  • age at conviction the younger, the higher the risk
  • age at first conviction the younger, the higher the risk
  • country of birth ethnic minorities display more recidivism
  • offence risks highest after violence and property offences
  • # previous convictions the more, the higher the risk
  • cf. Lloyd, Mair and Hough (1994): England & Wales
  • cf. Langan & Levin (2002): USA
  • cf. www.ssb.no (2005): Norway
  • cf. Command Papers 5675 (1936): England

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

the use of projections predicted and actual reconviction rates following a short prison term
The use of projectionsPredicted and actual reconviction rates following a short prison term

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

countries in europe with national recidivism data
Countries in Europe with national recidivism data

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

ernr european research group on national reconviction rates
ERNREuropean Research group on National Reconviction rates

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

making international comparisons of reconviction rates
Making international comparisons of reconviction rates

6 good reasons not to do it:

  • Differences in judicial system;
  • Differences in sentencing practices;
  • Differences in registration;
  • Differences in methods and measures being used;
  • Differences in offender groups;
  • Differences in periods of observation

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

general rates of recidivism in seven european countries
General rates of recidivism in seven European countries

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

10 steps plan towards more comparable reconviction statistics
10 steps-plantowards more comparable reconviction statistics

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

slide16
Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009
general and special recidivism among dutch drug offenders convicted in 2002 n 11 072
General and special recidivism among Dutch drug offenders convicted in 2002 (n= 11,072)

Monitoring Recidivism Strasbourg, September 11th 2009

ad