1 / 5

Liberty and Pacifism

Liberty and Pacifism. Bryan Caplan Dep’t of Economics Mercatus Center George Mason University. Pacifism. I’m a libertarian and a pacifist.

arleen
Download Presentation

Liberty and Pacifism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Liberty and Pacifism Bryan Caplan Dep’t of Economics Mercatus Center George Mason University

  2. Pacifism • I’m a libertarian and a pacifist. • pacifism: The doctrine that disputes (especially between countries) should be settled without recourse to violence; the active opposition to such violence, especially the refusal to take part in military action • pacifist: An individual who disagrees with war on principle • Key point: By “pacifism” I don’t mean opposition to all violence. • I don’t deny the right of self-defense; I deny the premise that “national defense” is self-defense.

  3. “National Defense” Is Aggression • For the libertarian absolutist, the case for pacifism is easy: Your rights are not a license to violate others’ rights. • Fiscal problem: Military action is wrong unless 0% tax-funded. • Deeper problem: Military action is wrong if it deliberately targets or recklessly endangers innocent individuals – people who have not personally aggressed. • No real-world war is even close. If a cop fought crime the way that “nice” governments wage war, we’d put him in jail. • You could take this as a reductio ad absurdum of libertarian absolutism. But you can build the case for pacifism on much weaker premises.

  4. The Common-Sense Case for Pacifism • Premise #1: The immediate costs of war are clearly awful. • “A hospital alone shows what war is.” - Remarque • Premise #2: The long-run benefits of war are highly uncertain. • See World War I for starters. • Facts: “Deterrence” often provokes – and “appeasement” often placates. • Premise #3: You shouldn’t violate libertarian rights unless the long-run benefits substantially exceed the short-run costs. • The case of forced organ donation. • The case for pacifism fails in weird hypotheticals, but rarely if ever in the real world.

  5. Objections Pre-Answered • Collective guilt: “There are no ‘innocents’ on the other side.” • Kids? Dissidents? The apathetic? • It’s on them: “The bad guys are using innocents as human shields.” • Plausible in narrow cases. But living within a few miles of a bad guy doesn’t make you a human shield. • “The long-run benefits of war aren’t highly uncertain to me.” • Let’s bet - and I want odds.

More Related