1 / 16

The main tool kit for our project: Jordmod – a partial equilibrium model of Norwegian agriculture

The main tool kit for our project: Jordmod – a partial equilibrium model of Norwegian agriculture. Ivar Gaasland (SNF). Outline. General characteristics of Jordmod Adaptation at the farm level – Model Farm illustration Adaptation at the sector level – Climate policy scenario

ariel-gross
Download Presentation

The main tool kit for our project: Jordmod – a partial equilibrium model of Norwegian agriculture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The main tool kit for our project:Jordmod – a partial equilibrium model of Norwegian agriculture Ivar Gaasland (SNF)

  2. Outline • General characteristics of Jordmod • Adaptation at the farm level – Model Farm illustration • Adaptation at the sector level – Climate policy scenario • Improvement of model – on-going work • Use of model - potential

  3. General characteristics • Model class • Partial equilibrium model (small sector assumptions) • Small country assumption • Comparative static model • Long run perspective • Domestic and foreign products perfect substitutes

  4. General characteristics north Price S south-west PW D Milk production

  5. General characteristics • Optimization model Max: producers’ + importers’ + consumers’ surplus subject to: 1) available land 2) regulations 3) policy targets • Policy analysis • optimal policy subject to policy targets • exogenous policy instruments, like: • Subsidies of various kinds • Import tariffs and quotas • Emission taxes or quotas

  6. General characteristics • 32 production regions (e.g., western Norway) • 11 model farm types (e.g., combined milk and beef) • 15 products (e.g., milk and beef) • 8 intermediaries (e.g., grass fodder) • 4 land qualities • arable land, food grain • arable land, other • surface tilled land • infield pasture • 32 regions

  7. Example model farm -milk and beef production Western Norway • Separate supply module that constructs model farms for given relative prices, technology, and natural restrictions • 36 activities to choose among • Most inputs are proportional to the number of animals and land units, but endogenous: • Plant yield per land unit = f(nitrogen) • Milk production per cow = g(fodder) • Functions and coefficients for GHG emission have been attached to activities and production factors • IPCC methodology, adapted to Norwegian conditions and practices)

  8. Milk and beef production Western Norway – current policy

  9. Milk and beef production Western Norway – current policy

  10. Milk and beef production Western Norway – carbon tax

  11. Milk and beef production Western Norway – carbon tax

  12. Adaptation at the sector level –climate policy analysis GHG emission target: • 30 percent reduction in GHG emission compared to base solution Policy assumptions: • Current policy as a point of departure • Market access and export subsidy commitment as in the Doha proposal • Carbon tax: NOK 300 per ton GHG emissions • Production and land use as high as possible subject to these requirements

  13. Climate policy analysis

  14. Climate policy analysis • Abatement costs is negative in agriculture if no value is attributed to agricultural activity beyond the world market price of food

  15. Improvements of model -on-going work • Data • Regional differences in emission or sequestrationwith respect to land use (e.g., till/no-till; forest) at different land types (e.g., cultivated wetland; mineral soil) • Nationally adapted emission coefficients • Technologies • Restoration of wetland, forest, biogas, bio-char • Model aspects • Dynamic aspects handled in a comparative static model • “Permanence”

  16. Use of model –potential • Cost-benefit analysis of different ways to reduce GHG emissions from agriculture • Trade-offs between policy objectives, e.g., emission cut vs.: • production targets • land amenities values • What if carbon sequestration on agricultural land is credited?

More Related