1 / 9

EGEE statement

EGEE statement. applications. EU and EU member states major investment in Grid Technology Several good prototype results Next Step: Leverage current and planned national programmes w ork close ly with relevant industrial Grid developers and NRNs build on existing middeware and expertise

arden
Download Presentation

EGEE statement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EGEE statement applications • EU and EU member states major investment in Grid Technology • Several good prototype results • Next Step: • Leverage current and planned national programmes • work closely with relevant industrial Grid developers and NRNs • build on existing middeware and expertise • create a general European Grid production quality infrastructure • This can be achieved for a minimum of €100m/4 years on top of the national and regional initiatives EGEE network

  2. Projects features • Integration of existing national and regional initiatives • International cooperation (including US and AP) • Standards (through GGF) • Actors: Grid developers for academia and industry • Tackle the challenge of usability, scalability, cost/performance • Service models for fast uptake by industry • Must provide supercomputing performance at commodity cost • Support for training, usage, large scale applications etc

  3. Towards UKHEP Engagement in Framework 6 • See discussion document • 29/10/02 CB outline approval • 5/11/02 EGEE core task force • Dec 02 EU Call • Jan 03 GridPP Tier-2 tenders • Jan/Feb 03 PPARC Call for Tier-1 Centre • Mar/Apr 03 EGEE Proposal submission • ** Tier-1 and Tier-2 Centres not yet defined (work with prototypes)** • Sep 03 Tier-2 funding starts… • Dec 03 DataGrid funding ends • ~Jan 04 DataGrid’ as part of EGEE?

  4. Towards UKHEP Engagement in Framework 6 • Objectives • Obtain EU funding to develop the UK part of a pan-European infrastructure • Access to core middleware developed in Europe • Benefit from European “critical mass” on EU external matters • Leverage access to non-HEP resources (and share some UK resources) • Obtain leverage on domestic funding (this was particularly useful at the time of DataGrid) • Increase coherence with UK core e-Science through joint activity in EGEE

  5. Towards UKHEP Engagement in Framework 6 • Areas of Interest • Production quality Grid resources (24x7x52 etc.) • Grid operations; maintenance and upgrades/rollout • Middleware support • Focused M/W development activities – oriented towards production grid support – potential overlaps with other proposals (?)

  6. UK Position within EGEE? • Starting point: DataGrid Success.. • Mainly middleware (15 PPARC-funded + 5 EU-funded + 6 EPSRC/PPARC Computing Science posts) • New: focus on production grids • Need to assess UK priorities • Input/Negotiations: • Neil Geddes (UK-EU role beyond PPARC) • Robin Middleton (EU DataGrid-UK, DataGrid PMB) • Tony Doyle (GridPP Project Leader, DataGrid PMB) • Pete Clarke (Networking, DataTAG, DataGrid PTB) • Preliminary PMB discussions…

  7. PMB Preliminary Discussions.. • Post Requirements – Scenario for Discussion: • Area EGEE? Total Ref. • Tier-1/A ~4 ~16 PMB-11 • Tier-2 ~4 ~16 PMB-08 • Middleware ~4 ~20 • = PMB Prioritised List – recommendation to CB: • Considerations: • LHC computing UK leading role in 2004 • S Tier-2 ~ Tier-1 • Transition from Prototype to Production Deployment • Particle physics leading role in UK e-Science • EU-wide middleware development • Build upon UK PP strengths

  8. PMB Preliminary Discussions.. • Principal Partner: • CLRC • PPARC • GridPP consortium • = PMB Prioritised List – recommendation to CB: • Considerations: • Clear reporting mechanism (to the EU) • Fund support across UK (meeting specific reqts.) • Additional funding (non-EU, non-PPARC) • Engagement of UK PP Community (GridPP) • Meeting non-PP requirements (e-Science centres) • EU funding via Research Councils?? (OST) • Other political (CB)..

  9. CB Recommendations • UK involvement in EGEE • Does CB recommend participation? • EU-funded post priorities • Are the general priorities appropriate/approved? • Principal Partner • Timely decision required – strengthens UK’s case within EGEE. • Next Step… • Return to EGEE core with GridPP input for EGEE proposal development… 5/11/02…

More Related