1 / 24

Institutional Controls

Institutional Controls. Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil. Institutional Controls. Introduction Types Purposes Stakeholders Procedures. Institutional Controls (“ICs”). “Non-engineering measures to affect human activities to prevent or reduce exposure” May be legal or administrative

ardara
Download Presentation

Institutional Controls

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil

  2. Institutional Controls • Introduction • Types • Purposes • Stakeholders • Procedures

  3. Institutional Controls (“ICs”) • “Non-engineering measures to affect human activities to prevent or reduce exposure” • May be legal or administrative • Usually used in conjunction with physical controls and/or active remediation

  4. Purposes • Eliminate or restrict exposure pathways • Ensure integrity of engineering controls • Limit land uses • Prohibit use of resources • Notify public of former activities / residual impacts

  5. Benefits • May be used in place of technically infeasible or economically impracticable alternatives • May take advantage of less stringent clean-up standards • Accelerate completion of field work

  6. Sources of Guidance • ASTM Standard E 2091-00 • EPA Site Manager’s Guide to Using ICs • State environmental agencies

  7. Types of ICs • Informational devices • Governmental controls • Enforcement tools • Proprietary controls

  8. Informational Devices • Weakest • Merely put public “on notice” • No property interest conveyed

  9. Governmental Controls • Relatively easy to change • Unanticipated exceptions (e.g., day care center at office building) • Enforced by local / state government • Third parties must be “aggrieved” to enforce or appeal change

  10. Enforcement Tools • Includes orders and permits • Binding only on respondent / signatory • Not transferable • Enforced by governmental agency

  11. Proprietary Controls • Creates a property interest • Limits site use or activity • “Runs with the land” • Binding on successors • Can only be enforced by “grantee” or successors

  12. Layering of ICs • Concurrent use of different ICs • Redundant, but varying, ICs may prevent breakdown • Ideally, different ICs are managed by different entities

  13. ICs Used in Series • Different ICs may be utilized consecutively: • Initial enforcement action • Completion of remedial efforts • Implementation of engineering controls • Recordation of activity and use limitation

  14. Considerations for Selecting ICs • Costs of alternative cleanup goals • Limitations on property use • Effect on property value • Uncertainty of residual impacts • Possible impacts to value of surrounding properties

  15. Choosing the Right ICs and Making Them Work • Conduct adequate investigation of affected area • Secure cooperation from adjacent landowners • Identify appropriate grantee • Ensure integrity of engineering control • Prevent unauthorized access

  16. Considerations for Lender • Require disclosure and compliance with existing ICs • Prepare for potential future ICs • Enforcement of ICs • Marketability of collateral • Protection from lender liability

  17. Planning for ICs • Coordinate efforts with: • All appropriate levels of government • Adjacent property owners • Public • Identify entities responsible for O&M • Identify funding sources

  18. Remaining Sources of Liability • CERCLA / Other statutory causes of action • Common law causes of action • Natural resource damages • Public trust doctrine • Reopener clauses in ICs / orders

  19. Potential Sources of Protection • Contractual provisions • Environmental insurance • Layer ICs • Covenants not to sue • Comfort / “No Further Action” letters • Other site specific considerations

  20. Example: Connecticut ELUR • “Environmental Land Use Restriction” • Regulations provide boilerplate language • Allows selection of various restrictions

  21. Technical Requirements for ELUR • Complete investigation of affected area • Meet appropriate standards under remediation regulations • A-2 survey of affected area

  22. Legal Requirements for ELUR • Provide required public notice • Obtain subordination agreements • Document appropriateness of ELUR in a “decision document” • Secure approval by agency or “licensed environmental professional,” as appropriate

  23. Recording an ELUR • ELUR is recorded on local land records • Agency is grantee and enforcer of ELUR • Notice of recorded ELUR must be provided to local officials and public commenters • ELUR may be fully or partially released in the future

  24. Conclusion • Potentially significant savings of time and money • Make sure the ICs are right for the property • Secure cooperation from stakeholders • Provide for adequate maintenance of ICs • Ensure proper enforcement mechanism

More Related